SavedAdd your journal

Journals / European Oral Research / 2022 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2

Shear bond strengths of five porcelain repair systems to zirconia infrastructures

Sirageddin AL-HMADI
Funda EROL
Melahat GÜVEN ÇELİK
Pages
55–60
Publication Date
2022-05-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The three repair systems, Ivoclar, Clearfil, and Bisco, were more effective than the Single Bond and Ultradent repair systems in repairing zirconia, and their bond failure modes were both mixed and adhesive.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the effect of five porcelain repair systems on shear bond strength in composite and zirconia infrastructures and to identify the bond failure mode after thermocycling.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Disk-shaped zirconia samples (N = 50) were divided into five groups (n = 10) according to repairing system type.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The three repair systems, Ivoclar, Clearfil, and Bisco, were more effective than the Single Bond and Ultradent repair systems in repairing zirconia, and their bond failure modes were both mixed and adhesive.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Repair system · zirconia · shear bond

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the effect of five porcelain repair systems on shear bond strength in composite and zirconia infrastructures and to identify the bond failure mode after thermocycling. Materials and Methods: Disk-shaped zirconia samples (N = 50) were divided into five groups (n = 10) according to repairing system type. Each repair system was applied to the zirconium samples and a hybrid composite was used for repairing. Shear bond testing of all groups was carried out using a universal testing machine after thermocycling. Results: Repair systems demonstrated no significant difference in repairing zirconia except Single Bond. Single Bond was the weakest in repairing the infrastructures. The highest and lowest mean bond strength values for the zirconia groups were 18,91 MPa and 3,63 MPa, respectively. Conclusion: The three repair systems, Ivoclar, Clearfil, and Bisco, were more effective than the Single Bond and Ultradent repair systems in repairing zirconia, and their bond failure modes were both mixed and adhesive.

🔖

Cite This Article

AL-HMADI, S., EROL, F., ÇELİK, M. G. (2022). Shear bond strengths of five porcelain repair systems to zirconia infrastructures. European Oral Research, Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2, 55–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/665229

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Kelsey WP 3rd, Latta MA, Stanislav CM, Shaddy RS Comparison of composite resin-to-porcelain bond strength with three adhesives. Gen Dent 2000
  2. PMID: 11199616 google scholar 2. Tulunoglu IF, Beydemir B. Resin shear strength to porcelain and a base metal alloy using two polymerization schemes. J Prosthet Dent 2000
  3. google scholar 3. Sced IR, McLean JW. The strength of metal/ceramic bonds with base metals containing chromium. A preliminary report. Br Dent J 1972
  4. google scholar 4. Prado RA, Panzeri H, Fernandes Neto AJ, Neves FD, Silva MR, Mendonca G Shear bond strength of dental porcelains to nickel-chromium alloys. Braz Dent J 2005
  5. google scholar 5. Ikemura K, Tanaka H, Fujii T et al. Development of a new single-bottle multi-purpose primer for bonding to dental porcelain, alumina, zirconia, and dental gold alloy. Dent Mater J 2011
  6. google scholar 6. Yavuz T, Dilber E, Kara HB et al. Effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength in two different ceramic systems. Lasers Med Sci 2013
  7. google scholar 7. Lee SJ, Cheong CW, Wright RF, et al. Bond strength of the porcelain repair system to all-ceramic copings and porcelain. J Prosthodont 2014
  8. google scholar 8. Della Bona A, Mecholsky JJ, Jr, Barrett AA, et al. Characterization of glass-infiltrated alumina-based ceramics. Dent Mater 2008
  9. google scholar 9. Kirmali O, Kapdan A, Harorli OT, Barutcugil C, Ozarslan MM. Efficacy of ceramic repair material on the bond strength of composite resin to zirconia ceramic. Acta Odontol Scand 2015
  10. google scholar 10. Gordon SR, Lloyd PM Fixed prosthodontics in the elderly population. Life expectancy of fixed restorations, failures, and retreatment methods. Dent Clin North Am 1992
  11. google scholar 11. Walton JN, Gardner FM, Agar JR. A survey of crown and fixed partial denture failures: length of service and reasons for replacement. J Prosthet Dent 1986
  12. google scholar 12. Leibrock A, Degenhart M, Behr M, Rosentritt M, Handel G. In vitro study of the effect of thermo- and loadcycling on the bond strength of porcelain repair systems. J Oral Rehabil 1999
  13. google scholar 13. Ozcan M. >Fracture reasons in ceramic-fused-to-metal restorations. J Oral Rehabil 2003
  14. google scholar 14. Casucci A, Monticelli F, Goracci C, et al. Effect of surface pre-treatments on the zirconia ceramic-resin cement microtensile bond strength. Dent Mater 2011 Oct