Journals / European Oral Research / 2023 / Cilt: 57 Sayı: 3

Efficiency of ProTaper Universal Retreatment, Reciproc Blue and XP-endo Shaper in the removal of a bioceramic-based root canal filling

Pages
159–164
Publication Date
2023-09-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

XPS was associated with less extrusion while regaining more rapid access to the periapical area than PTUR and RB.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: This in vitro study aimed to assess the performance of ProTaper Universal Retreatment (PTUR), Reciproc Blue (RB), and XP-endo Shaper (XPS) system in the removal of bioceramic root canal filling.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Forty-five human single-rooted mandibular premolars were prepared up to 30/.04 and filled with Endosequence BC sealer and BC points before being assigned into three groups (n=15).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:XPS was associated with less extrusion while regaining more rapid access to the periapical area than PTUR and RB.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Debris extrusion · endodontic retreatment · Endosequence BC sealer

Abstract

Purpose: This in vitro study aimed to assess the performance of ProTaper Universal Retreatment (PTUR), Reciproc Blue (RB), and XP-endo Shaper (XPS) system in the removal of bioceramic root canal filling. Materials and Methods: Forty-five human single-rooted mandibular premolars were prepared up to 30/.04 and filled with Endosequence BC sealer and BC points before being assigned into three groups (n=15). The root canal fillings were removed until reaching predetermined working length (WL) with PTUR in group 1, RB in group 2, and XPS in group 3. During the removal of the filling material, apically extruded debris was collected in preweighed Eppendorf tubes, and operation time was recorded with a digital chronometer. Reaching the WL and maintaining apical patency were evaluated separately. The data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests. Results: The mean amount of extruded debris was highest in the PTUR group, although all instruments caused apical extrusion of debris. The mean time for reaching WL was longest for RB and shortest for XPS, with significant differences among the groups (p<0.05). Although the difference was not significant (p=0.799), in the PTUR group the WL was reached in 93.3% of the samples, which was higher than other groups (86.7%). Conclusion: All tested systems caused a certain amount of debris extrusion. XPS was associated with less extrusion while regaining more rapid access to the periapical area than PTUR and RB.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİFTÇİOĞLU, E., GÜZEL, R. S., DİNÇER, G. A., KARAKAYA, G., KÜÇÜKAY, E. S. (2023). Efficiency of ProTaper Universal Retreatment, Reciproc Blue and XP-endo Shaper in the removal of a bioceramic-based root canal filling. European Oral Research, Cilt: 57 Sayı: 3, 159–164. https://ajindex.com/articles/1016027

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Torabinejad M, White SN. Endodontic treatment opti canal treatment: alternatives to single-tooth implants. J Am Dent Assoc 2016
  2. google scholar Stabholz A, Friedman S. Endodontic retreatment—case selection and technique. Part 2: treatment planning for retreatment. J Endod 1988
  3. google scholar Huang X, Ling J, Wei X, Gu L. Quantitative evaluation of debris extruded apically by using ProTaper Universal Tulsa rotary system in endodontic retreatment. J Endod 2007
  4. google scholar Siqueira Jr JF, Röças IN, Favieri A, Machado AG, Gahyva SM, Oliveira JC, et al. Incidence of postoperative pain after intracanal procedures based on an antimicrobial strategy. J Endod 2002
  5. google scholar Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors. J Endod 2004
  6. google scholar Hülsmann M, Bluhm V. Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different rotary NiTi instruments in root canal retreatment. Int Endod J 2004
  7. google scholar Schirrmeister JF, Wrbas K-T, Meyer KM, Altenburger MJ, Hellwig E. Efficacy of different rotary instruments for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment. J Endod 2006
  8. google scholar Gu LS, Ling JQ, Wei X, Huang XY. Efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal from root canals. Int Endod J 2008
  9. google scholar AlOmari T, Al-Fodeh R, Mustafa R, El-Farraj H, Khaled W, Jamleh A. Debris Extrusion Using Reciproc Blue and XP Endo Shaper Systems in Root Canal Retreatment. Int J Dent 2021:6697587. google scholar Doğanay Yıldız E, Arslan H. The effect of blue thermal treatment on endodontic instruments and apical debris extrusion during retreatment procedures. Int Endod J 2019
  10. google scholar Silva EJNL, Sa L, Belladonna FG, Neves AA, Accorsi-Mendonça T, Vieira VT, et al. Reciprocating versus rotary systems for root filling removal: assessment of the apically extruded material. J Endod 2014
  11. google scholar Lu Y, Wang R, Zhang L, Li H, Zheng Q, Zhou X, et al. Apically extruded debris and irrigant with two N i-T i systems and hand files when removing root fillings: a laboratory study. Int Endod J 2013
  12. google scholar Bürklein S, Schafer E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod 2012
  13. google scholar Ersev H, Yılmaz B, Dinçol M, Dağlaroğlu R. The efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment instrumentati