SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2016 / Sayı: 48

CONTENT ANALYSIS OF “HOUSE OF CARDS” FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF PUBLIC CHOICE

KAMU TERCİHİ PERSPEKTİFİNDEN “HOUSE OF CARDS”IN İÇERİK ANALİZİ

Devrim Özkan
Buğra KALKAN
Pages
38–63
Publication Date
2016-04-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The TV show, “House of Cards” is studied by using content analysis with in the frame of “public choice theory”.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Structural construction process of the modern politics emerges with the development of the communication systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Modernism is formed by the establishment of the mechanisms that enable the communication and interaction of all the factors and subjects that generate the society.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The TV show, “House of Cards” is studied by using content analysis with in the frame of “public choice theory”.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:House of Cards · Politik Drama · Televizyon Programı

Abstract

Structural construction process of the modern politics emerges with the development of the communication systems. Modernism is formed by the establishment of the mechanisms that enable the communication and interaction of all the factors and subjects that generate the society. Therefore, new media tools are used to provide the communication between individuals and institutions. So we encounter with many representations of the modern politics on the media. Individuals form their opinions about the operations of the system by analysing and discussing some of the representations of the modern politics between each other. Especially the political TV shows revive the public debates over politics. The most salient political TV show of the recent years is “House of Cards”. One can find many data that represents the modern political system in the TV show, “House of Cards”. The TV show, “House of Cards” is studied by using content analysis with in the frame of “public choice theory”.

Özet

Modern politikanın yapısal inşa süreci, iletişim sistemlerinin gelişimiyle birlikte gerçekleşir. Modernlik, toplumu meydana getiren tüm faktör ve öznelerin karşılıklı iletişim ve etkileşimini sağlayan mekanizmaların tesisi ile oluşturulur. Bunun için, kişi ve kurumlar arasında iletişimi temin edecek yeni medya araçları kullanılır. Bu nedenle medyada modern politikanın çok sayıda temsili ile karşılaşılır. Kişiler modern politikanın medyadaki çeşitli temsillerini değerlendirip kendi aralarında tartışarak sistemin işleyişine dair kanaat edinirler. Özellikle televizyon kanallarındaki politik drama dizileri politikaya dair kamusal tartışmaların canlanmasını sağlar. Son yıllarda, bu politik dramlardan en dikkat çekeni “House of Cards”dır. “House of Cards” televizyon dizisinde modern politik sistemi temsil eden çok sayıda veri ile karşılaşılmaktadır. Çalışmamızda “House of Cards” televizyon dizisi “kamu tercihi teorisi” çerçevesinde içerik analizi kullanılarak incelenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özkan, D., KALKAN, B. (2016). CONTENT ANALYSIS OF “HOUSE OF CARDS” FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF PUBLIC CHOICE. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı: 48, 38–63. https://ajindex.com/articles/659915

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Buttler, E. (2012). Public Choice, a Primer. London: Institute for Economic Affairs. Dixit, A. K.&Nalebuff B.J. (1993).
  2. Thinking Strategically, The Competitive Edge in Business, Politics and Everyday Life, New York: Norton Paperback. Eason, L., Willimon, B. (Screenwriter) & Wright, R. (Director). (2014, February 14). Episode 10 [Television series episode]. In K. Spacey, E. Roth, J. Donen, D. Brunetti, A. Davies, M. Dobbs, J. Melfi, B. Willimon, D. Manson (Producers). House of Cards. Los Gatos, California, United States: Netflix. Fan, D. (1988). Predictions of Public Opinion from the Mass Media: Computer Content Analysis and Mathematical Modelling (Contributions to the Study of Mass Media and Communications). New York, Westport, Cennecticut, London: Greenwood Press.
  3. Forman, S. (Screenwriter), & Schumacher, J. (Director). (2013, February 1). Episode 6 [Television series episode]. In K. Spacey, E. Roth, J. Donen, D. Brunetti, A. Davies, M. Dobbs, J. Melfi, B. Willimon, D. Manson (Producers). House of Cards. Los Gatos, California, United States: Netflix. Gaus, G. (2012). The Order of Public Reason: A Theory of Freedom and Morality in a Diverse and Bounded World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Gionfriddo, G., Willimon, B. (Screenwriter), Coulter, A. (Director). (2013, February 1). Episode 12 [Television series episode]. In K. Spacey, E. Roth, J. Donen, D. Brunetti, A. Davies, M. Dobbs, J. Melfi, B. Willimon, D. Manson (Producers). House of Cards. Los Gatos, California, United States: Netflix. Hanjalic, A. (2004). Content-Based Analysis of Digital Video. New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow: Kluwer Academıc Publishers.
  5. Huff, K., Barnow, K., Willimon, B. (Screenwriter), & Franklin, C. (Director). (2013, February 1). Episode 11 [Television series episode]. In K. Spacey, E. Roth, J. Donen, D. Brunetti, A. Davies, M. Dobbs, J. Melfi, B. Willimon, D. Manson (Producers). House of Cards. Los Gatos, California, United States: Netflix. Keller, J. R. (2015). The Vice in Vice President: House of Cards and the Morality Tradition. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 43:3, 111-120.
  6. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis an Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications. Krueger, A. O. (1974 June). The Political Economy of Rent-Seeking Society. The American Economic Review, 64 (3). Lin, K. (Screenwriter), Coles, J. (Director). (2014, February 14). Episode 5 [Television series episode]. In K. Spacey, E. Roth, J. Donen,