Journals / Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

COMPARISON OF REPUTATION MEASUREMENTS IN TURKEY AND WORLD

TÜRKİYE’DEKİ VE DÜNYA’DAKİ İTİBAR ÖLÇÜMLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Pages
289–306
Publication Date
2015-03-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The purpose of this study is to introduce about definition of corporate reputation and comparison of reputation measurements that are academic or popular in Turkey and World.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Reputation, which could defined with different concepts as respectability, prestige, recognition, image, identity, brand, credibility, attracts researchers’ attention of last years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Corporate reputation reflects the all shareholders’ perceptions about organizations’ practices.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The purpose of this study is to introduce about definition of corporate reputation and comparison of reputation measurements that are academic or popular in Turkey and World.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İtibar · İtibar Ölçümü · Saygınlık

Abstract

Reputation, which could defined with different concepts as respectability, prestige, recognition, image, identity, brand, credibility, attracts researchers’ attention of last years. Corporate reputation reflects the all shareholders’ perceptions about organizations’ practices. Reputation measurement is also criteria which reflect these perceptions. The purpose of this study is to introduce about definition of corporate reputation and comparison of reputation measurements that are academic or popular in Turkey and World.

Özet

Saygınlık, prestij, tanınmışlık, imaj, kimlik, marka, kredibilite gibi farklı kavramlarla ifade edilen itibar, son yıllarda araştırmacıların ilgisini çeken bir konu haline gelmiştir. Kurumların itibarı, en net tanımıyla, kurum içerisindeki ve kurum dışındaki paydaşların kurumun göstermiş olduğu faaliyetlere ilişkin algılamalarının bütününü yansıtan bir kavramdır. İtibar ölçümü ise, kurumlara ilişkin bu algılamaları yansıtan ölçütlerdir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, itibar kavramına ilişkin yapılacak genel bir tanım çerçevesinde Türkiye’de ve Dünya’da yapılan akademik ya da popüler nitelikte olan itibar ölçümlerine ilişkin karşılaştırmalı olarak bilgi vermektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ESEN, E. (2015). COMPARISON OF REPUTATION MEASUREMENTS IN TURKEY AND WORLD. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 289–306. https://ajindex.com/articles/6598

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. ALSOP, R., The 18 Immutable Laws of Corporate Reputation, Business Summaries, 2004.
  2. ANG, S. H. & WIGHT A.,„„Building Intangible Resources: The Stickiness of Reputation‟‟, Corporate Reputation Review, 12,1, 2009, 21-32.
  3. ARGÜDEN, Y., İtibar Yönetimi, Ankara, Arge DanıĢmanlık Yayınları. No:4. 2003. AYDEMĠR, B., „„ĠĢletmelerin Yeni Rekabet Aracı Olarak Kurumsal Ġtibar‟‟, İş, Güç, Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 10, 2, 2008. BRAMMER S. & PAVELIN, S., „„Building a Good Reputation‟‟, European Management Journal, 22, 6, 2004, 704–713.
  4. CAMPBELL, K & SHERMAN, W. R., „„Lists & More Lists: Making Sense of Corporate Reputations‟‟, Journal of Business&Economic Research, 8,7, 2010, 47-58. CAPĠTAL DERGĠSĠ, Aylık İş ve Ekonomi Dergisi, Yıl:16, Sayı:2008/12, 2008. CAPĠTAL DERGĠSĠ, Aylık İş ve Ekonomi Dergisi, Yıl:17, Sayı:2009/12, 2009. CAPĠTAL DERGĠSĠ, Aylık İş ve Ekonomi Dergisi, Yıl:17, Sayı:2010/12, 2010.
  5. CARUANA, A., „„Corporate Reputation: Concept and Measurement‟‟, Journal of Product&Brand Management, 6,2, 1997, 109-118
  6. CHEN, JUI-KUEN & CHEN, I., „„Corporate Reputation Measurement For Privately Run Banking Industry in Taiwan‟‟, Global Journal of Business Research, 3, 2, 2009, 65-75.
  7. CHUN, R.,„„Corporate Reputation: Meaning and Measurement‟‟, International Journal of Management Reviews, 7, 2, 2005, s.91-109.
  8. CRAVENS, K., OLIVER, E. G. & RAMAMOORTI, S., „„The Reputation Index: Measuring and Managing Corporate Reputation‟‟, European Management Journal, 21, 2, 2003, 201-212.
  9. CASALO, L., FLAVIÁN, C. & GUINALÍU, M., „„The Influence of Satisfaction, Perceived Reputation and Trust on a Consumer's Commitment to a Website‟‟, Journal of Marketing Communications, 13, 1, 2007, 1–17.
  10. CASTRO, G., EMILIO NAVAS LOPEZ, J. & LOPEZ SAEZ, P., „„Business and Social Reputation: Exploring the Concept and Main Dimensions of Corporate Reputation‟‟, Journal of Business Ethics, 63, 2006, 361-370. DEMĠR, F., „„Kurumsal Ġtibar Ölçümünde KiĢiselleĢtirme Metaforu‟‟, Review of Social, Economic & Business Studies, 9/10, yy, 247-262
  11. DORTOK, A., „„A Managerial Look at the Interaction Between Internal Communication and Corporate Reputation‟‟, Corporate Reputation Review, 8, 4, 2006, 322-338.
  12. ERYILMAZ, M., „„Örgüt Ġtibarı Kavramı ve Yönetimi ile Ġlgili Bazı Sorunlar‟‟, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8, 1, 2008, 155-174.
  13. FIRESTEIN, P., „„Building and Protecting Corporate Reputation‟‟, Strategy &Leadership, 34, 4, 2006, 25-31.
  14. FOMBRUN, C. & FOSS, C., The Gauge: Fom