Journals / Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2022 / Sayı: 31

A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES ON CRYPTOCURRENCIES IN THE TIME OF COVID-19

Pages
241–261
Publication Date
2022-10-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained, it is seen that the selected studies are mostly scanned in the SCOPUS and SSCI indexes of the journals published.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:During the COVID-19 pandemic, the uncertainty in the markets was also reflected in the demand for cryptocurrencies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to visually present the bibliometric analyzes of empirical studies on cryptocurrencies during the COVID-19 pandemic period (between 2020-2022).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results obtained, it is seen that the selected studies are mostly scanned in the SCOPUS and SSCI indexes of the journals published.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2020-2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Time of COVID-19 · Cryptocurrencies · Empirical Studies

Özet

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the uncertainty in the markets was also reflected in the demand for cryptocurrencies. This study aims to visually present the bibliometric analyzes of empirical studies on cryptocurrencies during the COVID-19 pandemic period (between 2020-2022). For this purpose, VOSviewer software was used to perform a bibliometric analysis of 30 selected studies. According to the results obtained, it is seen that the selected studies are mostly scanned in the SCOPUS and SSCI indexes of the journals published. Most studies were conducted in Malaysia, followed by Pakistan and Spain. 7 studies were conducted in Malaysia and 3 studies each in Pakistan and Spain. In the studies, it was seen that the technology acceptance model, planned behavior theory, and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology were used the most, respectively. Structural equation modeling was used in 23 studies. When the variables used were examined, it was understood that the most used variables were the intention, risk, trust, and attitude. Considering the uncertainties in the pandemic period and the characteristics of cryptocurrencies, it is thought that the variables used to make significant contributions to the literature and relevant persons.

🔖

Cite This Article

YİĞENOĞLU, K., CESUR, A., ÇELİK, Z., AYDIN, İ. (2022). A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES ON CRYPTOCURRENCIES IN THE TIME OF COVID-19. Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı: 31, 241–261. https://ajindex.com/articles/656174

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abbasi, G. A., Tiew, L. Y., Tang, J., Goh, Y. N., & Thurasamy, R. (2021). The adoption of cryptocurrency as a disruptive force: Deep learning-based dual stage structural equation modelling and artificial neural network analysis. Plos one, 16(3), e0247582, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247582
  2. Albayati, H., Kim, S. K., & Rho, J. J. (2020). Accepting financial transactions using blockchain technology and cryptocurrency: A customer perspective approach. Technology in Society, 62, 101320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101320
  3. Alsmadi, A.A., Alrawashdeh, N., Al-Dweik, A.F., & Al-Assaf, M.I. (2022). Cryptocurrencies: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 6(3), 619-628. http://dx.doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.4.011
  4. Anser, M. K., Zaigham, G. H. K., Imran Rasheed, M., Pitafi, A. H., Iqbal, J., & Luqman, A. (2020). Social media usage and individuals' intentions toward adopting Bitcoin: The role of the theory of planned behavior and perceived risk. International Journal of Communication Systems, 33(17), e4590, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.4590
  5. Arias-Oliva, M., de Andrés-Sánchez, J., & Pelegrín-Borondo, J. (2021). Fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of factors influencing the use of cryptocurrencies in Spanish households. Mathematics, 9(4), 324, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/MATH9040324
  6. Arli, D., van Esch, P., Bakpayev, M., & Laurence, A. (2020). Do consumers really trust cryptocurrencies?. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 39(1), 74-90. https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-01-2020-0036
  7. Arouxet, M. B., Bariviera, A. F., Pastor, V. E., & Vampa, V. (2022). Covid-19 impact on cryptocurrencies: evidence from a wavelet-based Hurst exponent. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 596, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.127170
  8. Aslanidis, N., Bariviera, A.F., & Lopez, O.G. (2022). The link between cryptocurrencies and Google Trends attention. Finance Research Letters. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102654
  9. Assaf, A., Bhandari, A., Charif, H., & Demir, E. (2022). Multivariate long memory structure in the cryptocurrency markets: The impact of COVID-19. International Review of Financial Analysis, 82, 102132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102132
  10. Ayedh, A., Echchabi, A., Battour, M., & Omar, M. (2020). Malaysian Muslim investors’ behaviour towards the blockchain-based Bitcoin cryptocurrency market. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 12(4), 690-704. https://doi.org/10.1108/jima-04-2019-0081