Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of complications due to regional anesthesia for cesarean section

Sezaryen olgularında uygulanan rejyonel anestezi tekniklerinin yan etkilerinin sonuçları

Pages
145–151
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Spinal anesthesia, epidural anesthesia and combined spino-epidural anesthesia applied patients are included to the study group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Choosing the obstetric anesthesia technique should be carefully made because it would have an effect on both mother and fetus.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We intended to identify the complication rate and management of these complications in regional anesthesia applied pregnant women, retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Spinal anesthesia, epidural anesthesia and combined spino-epidural anesthesia applied patients are included to the study group.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Choosing the obstetric anesthesia technique should be carefully made because it would have an effect on both mother and fetus. Procedure related complications and management of them are as important as the anesthesia method. Regional anesthesia technique related complications are seen in rising numbers due to increasing numbers of regional applications. We intended to identify the complication rate and management of these complications in regional anesthesia applied pregnant women, retrospectively. Spinal anesthesia, epidural anesthesia and combined spino-epidural anesthesia applied patients are included to the study group.

Özet

Obstetrik anestezi seçimi, anne ile fetusun birlikte etkileneceği gözönüne alınarak daha dikkatli davranmayı gerektirir. Anestezist için seçilen anestezi tekniği ne kadar önemli ise, yapılan işleme ait komplikasyonlar ve bunların üstesinden nasıl gelineceğinin bilinmesi de o kadar önemlidir. Birçok hastanede obstetrik alanda rejyonel girişimlerin artmasıyla birlikte bu tekniklerin getirdiği komplikasyonlarda da artış görülmektedir. Çalışmamızda rejyonel anestezi uygulanan gebelerdeki komplikasyon oranlarını ve komplikasyonların nasıl giderildiğini retrospektif olarak değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Bu nedenle spinal anestezi, epidural anestezi ve kombine spinoepidural anestezi uygulanan hastalar çalışma grubuna dahil edildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

OBA, Ş., UYSALEL, A., ÖZAYAR, E., GÖKTUĞ, A. (2022). Comparison of complications due to regional anesthesia for cesarean section. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2, 145–151. https://ajindex.com/articles/654688

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Barret-Due A, Hagen I, Dahl V. Obstetric analgesia in Norvegian hospitals. Tidsskr Nor Laegefaren. 2005; 125:2504-2506
  2. Cuningham FG, Mac Donald PC, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap LC. Cesarean section and cesarean hysterctomy In: Williams Obstetrics Prentice-Hall International Inc 19th Edition pp:591-614
  3. Morgan GE, Mikhail MS. Obstetrics anesthesia. In: Clinical Anesthesiology. Appleton&Lange 1996; pp:705-725
  4. Cuningham FG, Mac Donald PC, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap LC. Analgesia and Anesthesia. In: Williams Obstetrics Prentice-Hall International Inc 19th Edition pp:425-443
  5. Carrie LE. Extradural, spinal or combined block for obstetric surgical anaesthesia. Br J Anaesthesia 1990; 65:225-233
  6. Brown DL. Spinal, epidural and caudal anesthesia. In: Anesthesia, Miller RD Volume 2: Churchill Livingstone, 1994; pp:1503-1533
  7. Cousins MJ, Bromage PR. Epidural neural blockade. In: Neural blockade. Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh P.O. TB Lippincott Company 1988
  8. Rout CC, Akoojee SS, Rocke DA, Gouws E. Rapid administration of crystalloid preload does not decrease the incidence of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for Caesarean section. Br J of Anesth 1992; 68:394-397
  9. Rout CC, Rocke DA, Levin J, Gouws E, Reddy D. A re-evaluation of the role of crystalloid preload in the prevention of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Anesthesiology 1993; 79:262-269
  10. Reiz S, Haggmark S, Johansson G, et al. Cardiotoxicity of ropivacaine-a new amide local anesthetic agent. Acta Anesthesiol Scand 1989; 33:93-98
  11. Moller R, Covino BG. Cardiac electrophysiologic properties of bupivacaine and lidocaine compared with those of ropivacaine, a new amide local anesthetic. Anesthesiology 1992; 77:735-741
  12. Santos A, Karpel B, Noble G. The placental transfer and fetal effects of levobupivacaine, racemic bupivacaine, and ropivacaine. Anesthesiology 1999; 90:1698-1703
  13. Whitehead E, Arrigoni B, Bannister J. An open study of ropivacaine in extradural anesthesia. Br J of Anesth 1990; 64:67-71
  14. Crosby E, Sandler A, Finucane B, Writer D, Reid D, McKenna J, Friedlander M, Miller A, Muir H, Shukla R. Comparison of epidural anesthesia with ropivacaine 0.5 % and bupivacaine 0.5 %, for caesarean section Can J Anaesth 1998; 45:1066-1071
  15. Bjornestad E, Smedvig JP, Bjerkreim T, Narverud G, Kolleros D, Bergheim R. Epidural ropivacaine 7.5 mg/ml for elective caeserean section: A double-blind comparison of efficacy and tolerability