Journals / Istanbul Business Research / 2017 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1

The Relationship between Image-Reputation, Financial and Quality Performance: An Application on Hospitals

İmaj-İtibar ile Finansal ve Kalite Performansı Arasındaki İlişkiler: Hastaneler Üzerine Bir Uygulama

Pages
19–33
Publication Date
2017-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, it is seenthat image and reputation and cost performance are not determinator factors of general performance.These results highlight that effective quality management policy and financial stability are the maindrivers of hospital performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Performance evaluation is an issue that shaped in the eyes of the beholder.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Traditionally financialperformance measurement is forefront in performance measurement but modern performancemeasurement approaches give equal importance to perceptional assessments.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, it is seenthat image and reputation and cost performance are not determinator factors of general performance.These results highlight that effective quality management policy and financial stability are the maindrivers of hospital performance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Performans Yönetimi · İmaj · İtibar

Abstract

Performance evaluation is an issue that shaped in the eyes of the beholder. Traditionally financialperformance measurement is forefront in performance measurement but modern performancemeasurement approaches give equal importance to perceptional assessments. The relationshipbetween quality, image and reputation perceptions continue to questioning in the literature which. Inthis study which is based on hospitals, confirmatory factor analysis was performed for understandingthe relationship between the quality, image-reputation, cost and financial performance indicatorsaccording to managers assessments. Findings show that quality (β=0.88, p<0.05) and financial(β=0.88, p<0.05) performance are prominent indicators of hospital performance. Moreover, it is seenthat image and reputation and cost performance are not determinator factors of general performance.These results highlight that effective quality management policy and financial stability are the maindrivers of hospital performance.

Özet

Performans değerlendirme değerlendiricinin gözünde şekillenen bir konudur. Örgütlerin performansdeğerlendirmelerinde geleneksel olarak finansal performans ölçümünün ön plana çıktığı görülmekteolup modern performans ölçüm yaklaşımları algısal değerlendirmelere de aynı derecede önemvermektedir. Literatürde finansal performans ölçütleri ile algılara dayanan kalite, imaj ve itibarperformans ölçütleri arasındaki ilişkiler sorgulanmaya devam edilmektedir. Hastaneleri esas alan buçalışmada, yönetici değerlendirmelerine göre kalite, imaj-itibar, maliyet ve finansal performansarasındaki ilişkileri incelemek amacıyla doğrulayıcı faktör analizi uygulanmıştır. Elde edilenbulgular kalite (β=0.88, p<0.05) ile finansal (β=0.88, p<0.05) performansın hastanelerde performansıaçıklamada ön plana çıkan değişkenler olduklarını göstermiş olup imaj-itibar kavramlarının vemaliyet performansının genel performansı belirleyici bir özelliğinin olmadığı görülmüştür. Busonuçlar etkili bir kalite yönetim politikası ve finansal açıdan sağlamlığın hastaneler için performansıbelirleyen temel unsurlar olduklarını vurgulamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇINAROĞLU, S. (2017). The Relationship between Image-Reputation, Financial and Quality Performance: An Application on Hospitals. Istanbul Business Research, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1, 19–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/65423

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abraham, T. (2007). Identifying the parameters of corporate reputation for the hospital industry in Singapore., A Dissertation, University of South Australia, Singapore. Adair, C. E., Simpson, L., Birdsell, J.M., Omelchuk, K., Casebeer, A.L., Gardiner, H.P., Newman, S., Beckie, A., Clelland, S., Hayden, K.A., & Beausejour, P. (2003). Performance measurement systems for health and mental health services: models, practices and effectiveness a state of the science review, Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.195.2219&rep=rep1&type=pdf. E.T.:16.06.2016.
  2. Alpar, R. (2011). Uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistiksel yöntemler, Detay Yayınları,
  3. Ankara.
  4. Bitner, M.J., & Hubbert A.R. (1994). Encounter satisfaction versus overall service satisfaction versus quality. Services Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 72– 92. Boscarino, J., & Stelber, S.R. (1982). Hospital shopping and consumer choice. Journal of Health Care Marketing, 2(2), 15-23.
  5. Çetin, A.T., Aksu M., & Özer G. (2012). Technology investments, performance and the effect of size and region in Turkish hospitals. The Service Industry Journal, 32(5), 747-771.
  6. Davies, Gary, Chun, R., & Kamins, M.A. (2009). Reputation gaps and the performance of service organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 530-546.
  7. Douglas, T.J. & Judge, W.Q. (2001). Total quality management implementation and competitive advantage: The role of structural control and exploration. Academy of Management, 44(1), 158-169.
  8. Easton, G.S., & Jarrell, S.L. (1998). The effects of total quality management on corporate performance: An empirical investigation. The Journal of Business, 71(2), 253-307.
  9. Floyd, F., & Widaman, K.F. (1995). Factor analysis in development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments, Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 286-299.
  10. Greene, J. (1996). Florida 2nd state to issue “Report Cards”. Modern Healthcare, 26(10). Gurd, B., & Gao, T. (2008). Lives in the balanced: An analysis of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) in health care organizations. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 57(1), 6-21.
  11. Hibbard, J. H., Stockard, J., & Tusler, M. (2005). Hospital performance reports: Impact on quality, market share and reputation. Health Affairs, 24(4), 1150-1160.
  12. Javalgi, R.O., Rao S.R., & Thomas, E.G. (1991). Choosing a hospital: Analysis of consumer tradeoffs, Journal of Health Care Market