Journals / Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: - Sayı: 48

Framing Theory in the Age of Social Media

Sosyal Medya Çağında Çerçeveleme Teorisi

Pages
446–457
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, frame analysis presents an even broader potential for the research of dynamic communication processes in the fast lives of virtual communities and the vast effects of online interaction of social, political, commercial institutions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Internet age has converged various traditional mainstream media institutions as well alternative media platforms together into a hybrid media system with the New Media system that includes alternative media like social media, in particular Twitter and Facebook.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Framing Theory and frame analysis has been found functional and suitable for researching complex social media communications and also the interplay of the social media with mainstream traditional media.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, frame analysis presents an even broader potential for the research of dynamic communication processes in the fast lives of virtual communities and the vast effects of online interaction of social, political, commercial institutions.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çerçeve Analizi · Sosyal Medya · Kitle İletişim

Abstract

The Internet age has converged various traditional mainstream media institutions as well alternative media platforms together into a hybrid media system with the New Media system that includes alternative media like social media, in particular Twitter and Facebook. Framing Theory and frame analysis has been found functional and suitable for researching complex social media communications and also the interplay of the social media with mainstream traditional media. We reviewed the literature of framing analysis in relation to social media, virtual communities and social movements to present a brief overview of the practical and theoretical potentials of frame analysis and also the particularities and problems that arose in regard to the dynamic nature of social media. As a result, frame analysis presents an even broader potential for the research of dynamic communication processes in the fast lives of virtual communities and the vast effects of online interaction of social, political, commercial institutions.

Özet

Geleneksel medyanın büyük ölçüde internet ortamına taşınmasıyla birlikte, sosyal medyanın farklı platformlarının (özellikle Twitter ve Facebook olmak üzere) farklı özellikleriyle birlikte hibrit/melez bir medya sistemi oluşturmuştur. Çerçeveleme Teorisi ve çerçeve analizi, kitle iletişim araştırmalarındaki işlevselliğini ve yaygınlığını yeni medya çağında geliştirmeye devam etmektedir. Özellikle Twitter ve Facebook’un yeni medya sisteminin bütünleştirici iletişim ekseni olarak kullanılması çerçeveleme mekanizmalarının aktif olarak kullanılmasını yaygınlaştırmıştır. Çerçeveleme ve sosyal medya literatüründeki güncel tartışmaları inceleyen çalışmamız, hem sosyal medyanın sahip olduğu farklı çerçeveleme dinamiklerine dikkat çekmekte, hem de kitlesel iletişimin, kişiler arası iletişimden kazandığı bazı özellikleri de kullanarak sanal toplulukların hızlı oluşum ve etkileşim (tartışma) süreçlerinde nasıl kullanıldığına dikkat çekmektedir. Bu nedenle, gerek toplumsal hareketlerin, gerekse siyasal ve toplumsal iletişim süreçlerinin incelenmesinde çerçeve analizi eskisinden daha büyük bir potansiyel sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRAN, M. S., ÖZARSLAN, H. (2022). Framing Theory in the Age of Social Media. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: - Sayı: 48, 446–457. https://ajindex.com/articles/653851

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ahmed, S.- Jaeho, C. – Kokil, J. (2019). Framing social conflicts in news coverage and social media: A multicountry comparative study. International Communication Gazette 81: 346–71.
  2. Aichner, T.; Jacob, F. (March 2015). "Measuring the Degree of Corporate Social Media Use" (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283073224). International Journal of Market Research. Araújo, B., & Prior, H. (2021). Framing political populism: The role of media in framing the election of Jair Bolsonaro. Journalism Practice, 15(2), 226-242.
  3. Aruguete, N., & Calvo, E. (2018). Time to# protest: Selective exposure, cascading activation, and framing in social media. Journal of communication, 68(3), 480-502.
  4. Bail, C. A. (2016). Cultural carrying capacity: Organ donation advocacy, discursive framing, and social media engagement. Social Science & Medicine, 165, 280-288.
  5. Bartlett, F. C.(1932)
  6. Remembering, A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge at the University Press. Great Britain. Downloaded: 2022. https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_2273030/component/file_2309291/content
  7. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Jason Aronson Inc, Notvale, New Jersey Blasco-Duatis, M.- Coenders, G.- Saez, M.- Garcia, N.F.- Cunha. I.F.(2019). Mapping the agenda-setting theory, priming and the spiral of silence in Twitter accounts of political parties. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 15(1): 4-24.
  8. Borah, P. (2011) Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade’s literature. Journal of Communication, 61: 246–263.
  9. Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G. J. (2016). Figurative framing: Shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole, and irony. Communication theory, 26(4), 410-430.
  10. Carty, V., & Onyett, J. (2006). Protest, cyberactivism and new social movements: The reemergence of the peace movement post 9/11. Social Movement Studies, 5(3), 229-249.
  11. Castells, M (2007).
  12. Communication, Power and Counter-power in the Network Society, International Journal of Communication 1, 238-266
  13. Domingo, D.- Heinonen, A. (2008). Weblogs and journalism: A typology to explore the blurring boundaries. Nordicom Review, 29(1) D’angelo, P. (2018). Doing news framing analysis II. Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives. Entman, R.M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58.
  14. Entman, R.M.- Usher, N. (2018). Framing in a fractured democracy: Impacts of digital technology on ideology, power and cascading