Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 4

Genetic appoproch in cases with disorders of sexual development

Cinsel farklılaşma bozukluğu olan olgularda genetik yaklaşım

Pages
223–228
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The diagnosis of disorders of sexual development is only possible through the establishment of phenotypic and genotypic association.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Disorder of sexual development is characterized with phenotypic-genotypic incompatibility and most of the cases result from the failure of steroid biosynthesis pathway.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this article genetic analysis results of 66 cases who were admitted to our department with disorders of sexual development diagnosed with clinical, laboratory and radiological findings since 2000 are presented.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The diagnosis of disorders of sexual development is only possible through the establishment of phenotypic and genotypic association.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Disorder of sexual development is characterized with phenotypic-genotypic incompatibility and most of the cases result from the failure of steroid biosynthesis pathway. In this article genetic analysis results of 66 cases who were admitted to our department with disorders of sexual development diagnosed with clinical, laboratory and radiological findings since 2000 are presented. Of all the cases, 10 (15.15%), 15 (22.72%) and 41 (62.12%) presented in the newborn, childhood and adult periods, respectively. Educational and economical status of the families of the cases presenting in the neonatal period were better than those of the cases presenting in adult period. Approximately one third of families with disorders of sexual development had consanguineous marriages. In this selected series of 66 cases, 16 cases (24.24%), 5 cases (13.20%), 2 cases (3.03%) and 43 cases (65.15%) had female pseudohermaphroditism, male pseudohermaphroditism, true hermaphroditism and gonadal dysgenesis, respectively. SRY gene region on Y chromosome was positive in all of the cases with male phenotype consistent ultrasonographically whereas it was negative in all of the cases with female phenotype consistent ultrasonographically. Disorders of sexual development are a medical and social problem, and early diagnosis depends on the education of the whole population. The diagnosis of disorders of sexual development is only possible through the establishment of phenotypic and genotypic association.

Özet

Cinsel farklılaşma bozukluğu, fenotip-genotip uyumsuzluğu ile karakterize bir tablo olup, olguların çoğunda steroid biyosentez yolağında problem vardır. Bu yazıda cinsel farklılaşma bozukluğu şikayeti ile 2000 yılından itibaren bölümümüze gönderilen, klinik, laboratuvar ve radyolojik olarak bu tanıyı destekleyen 66 olguda genetik analiz sonuçları sunulmaktadır. Olguların 10'u (%15.15) yenidoğan dönemi, 15'i (%22.72) çocukluk dönemi, 41'i (%62.12) erişkin döneminde bölümümüze başvurmuştur. Ailelerinin sosyoekonomik durumu incelendiğinde, eğitim ve gelir seviyesinin yenidoğan dönemi başvurularında, erişkin döneme göre daha iyi olduğu gözlendi. Cinsel farklılaşma bozukluğu bulunan olguların ailelerinde yaklaşık üçte bir oranında akraba evliliği saptandı. Seçilen 66 olguluk seride 16 olguda (%24.24) dişi psödohermafroditizmi, 5 olguda (%13.20) erkek psödohermafroditizmi, 2 olguda (%3.03) gerçek hermafroditizm ve 43 olguda (%65.15) gonadal disgenez tanısı konmuştur. Ultrasonografi bulguları erkek fenotipi ile uyumlu olan olguların tümünde Y kromozomu SRY gen bölgesi pozitif bulunurken, ultrasonografi bulguları dişi fenotiple uyumlu olan tüm olgularda SRY bölgesi negatif olarak saptandı. Cinsel farklılaşma bozukluğu medikal ve sosyal bir problem olup, erken tanı tüm toplumun bu konuda bilinçlendirilmesine bağlıdır. Cinsel farklılaşma bozukluğu bulunan olgularda tanı ancak genotip-fenotip ilişkisine göre mümkündür.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAHÇE, M., TUNCA, Y., GÜL, D., İMİRZALIOĞLU, N., TAŞÇILAR, M. E., BOLU, E., SAMEDLİ, S., KOZAN, S., TORUN, D., GÜRAN, Ş. (2009). Genetic appoproch in cases with disorders of sexual development. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 4, 223–228. https://ajindex.com/articles/225482

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Allen L. Disorders of sexual development. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2009; 36: 25-45
  2. Chavhan GB, Parra DA, Oudjhane K, Miller SF, Babyn PS, Pippi Salle FL. Imaging of ambiguous genitalia: classification and diagnostic approach. Radiographics 2008; 28: 1891-1904
  3. Hughes IA. Disorders of sex development: a new definition and classification. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 22: 119-134
  4. Yunis JJ. New chromosome techniques in the study of human neoplasia. Hum Pathol 1981; 12: 540-549
  5. Seabright M. Improvement of tyripsin method for banding chromosomes. Lancet 1973; 2: 1249-1250
  6. Mitelman F. Guidance for Cancer Cytogenetics, Supplement an International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. New York: Karger, 1991: 26-51
  7. Hughes I. Ambiguous genitalia (including sex reversal). In: Firth HV (ed). Oxford Desk Reference Clinical Genetics. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005: 38-41
  8. Jones KL. Smith’s Recognizable Patterns of Human Malformation. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders Publication, 2006: 777-782
  9. Hughes IA. Early management and gender assignment in disorders of sexual differentiation. Endocr Dev 2007; 11: 47-57
  10. Durmaz B, Alpman A, Pariltay E, et al. The evaluation of the referral reasons of patients at a tertiary pediatric genetic center in Izmir, Turkey. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2009; 13: 163-166
  11. Siklar Z, Berberoğlu M, Adiyaman P, et al. Disorders of gonadal development: a broad clinical, cytogenetic and histopathologic spectrum. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev 2007; 4: 210-217
  12. Göllü G, Yildiz RV, Bingol-Kologlu M, et al. Ambiguous genitalia: an overview of 17 years’ experience. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42: 840-844
  13. Tunçbilek E. Clinical outcomes of consanguineous marriages in Turkey. Turk J Pediatr 2001; 43: 277-279.