SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2

In one sited inguinal herni operations comparison of intrathecal % 0.5 hyperbaric bupivacaine, % 0.5 hyperbaric levobupivacaine ve % 0.5 isobaric levobupivacaine procedures in terms of hemodynamic stability, sensorial block, motor block and postoperative anagesia

Tek taraflı inguinal herni operasyonlarında intratekal % 0.5 hiperbarik bupivakain % 0.5 hiperbarik levobupivakain ve % 0.5 izobarik levobupivakain uygulamalarının hemodinamik stabilite, duyusal blok, motor blok ve postoperatif analjezi açısından karşılaştırılması

Neşe AYDIN
Osman EKİNCİ
Asuman Tekin YILMAZ
Pages
310–317
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was observed meaningful differences between groups in terms of motor block duration and beginning times of motor block (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In one sided inguinal herni operations between ages 16-76 , ASA l-lll, it is performed in spinal lacuna to 60 patients with central line approach technique in L3-4 interval.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is given in Group I 2,5 ml % 0.5 isobaric le-vobupivacai ne, in Group II 2,5 ml % 0.5 hyperbaric bupivacaine and in Group III 2,5 ml % 0.5 hyperbaric levobupivacaine.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was observed meaningful differences between groups in terms of motor block duration and beginning times of motor block (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In one sided inguinal herni operations between ages 16-76 , ASA l-lll, it is performed in spinal lacuna to 60 patients with central line approach technique in L3-4 interval. It is given in Group I 2,5 ml % 0.5 isobaric le-vobupivacai ne, in Group II 2,5 ml % 0.5 hyperbaric bupivacaine and in Group III 2,5 ml % 0.5 hyperbaric levobupivacaine. Sensorial block levels of patients were evaluated with pinprick test and motor block levels were evaluated with BromagesScala. SAP, DAP, MAP, HP, and sPO2 values monitoring with Petaş NOKMA 265 and were recorded during the operation. In all three groups it was not found statisticaly meaningful differences in terms of peroperatif and postoperative analjezik need , sensorial block, hemodyna-mics, side effects and patient surgical comfort (p>0.05). It was observed meaningful differences between groups in terms of motor block duration and beginning times of motor block (p

Özet

Günümüzde giderek daha geniş uygulama alanlarında tercih edilen spinal anestezide,bupivakain ile yeni geliştirilen lokal anestezik ajan levobupivakaini motor blok, sensoriyal blok, hemodinamik etkiler ve postoperatif analjezi açısından karşılaştırmayı amaçladık. Tek taraflı inguinal herni operasyonu planlanan 16-76 yaş arası, ASA l-lll ,60 hastada L3-4 aralığından orta hattan yaklaşım tekniği ile spinal aralığa girildi. Grup l'de 2,5 mi % 0.5 izobarik levobupivakain, Grup ll'de 2,5 mi % 0.5 hiperbarik bupivakain ve Grup lll'te 2,5 mi % 0.5 hiperbarik levobupivakain verildi. Hastaların sensoriyal blok düzeyi piprick testi ile motor blok derecesi ise Bromage Skalası ile değerlendirildi.Petaş NOKMA 265 ile monitorize edilerek operasyon boyunca SAB, DAB, OAB, KAH ve sPO2 değerleri kaydedildi. Her üç grup hastada peroperatif ve postoperatif analjezik ihtiyacı, sensoriyal blok, hemodinami, yan etkiler ile hasta ve cerrahi konfor açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunamadı (p>0.05). Motor blok süreleri ve motor blok başlama zamanları açısından gruplar arasında anlamlı farklılık olduğu görüldü (p

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, N., EKİNCİ, O., YILMAZ, A. T. (2022). In one sited inguinal herni operations comparison of intrathecal % 0.5 hyperbaric bupivacaine, % 0.5 hyperbaric levobupivacaine ve % 0.5 isobaric levobupivacaine procedures in terms of hemodynamic stability, sensorial block, motor block and postoperative anagesia. Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2, 310–317. https://ajindex.com/articles/651390

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Valentin N, Lomholt B, Jensen JS, Hejgaard N, Kreiner S: Spinal or general anaesthesia for surgery of the fractured hip? A prospective study of mortality in 578 patients. Br. J. Anaesth 58, 284-291, 1986. 2.Atkinson RS, Beynon DG, Browne CH, Lee JA, Rushman GB, Thome TC, Watt MJ. College of Anaesthetists? Br Med J. 1(6163): 624-5,1979. 3.Erdine S: Sinir Blokları 1. Baskı.
  2. Emre Matbaacılık, İstanbul. 49-80, 155-210, 221-230, 1993. 4.Kayhan Z: Klinik Anestzi 2.Baskı.Logos Yayıncılık, İstanbul. 435-453, 477-503, 1997. 5.Collins VJ: Principles of Anaesthesiology 3rd. Edition Volüm l-ll Lea and Febiger Philadelphia, 12-63, 708-709, 1259-1262, 1445, 1571, 1993. 6.Christian Glaser, Peter Marhofer, Gabriela Zimpfer, M. Marie T. Heinz, Christian Sitzwohl, Stephan Kapral and Ingrid Schindler. Levobupivacaine Versus Racemik Bupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia. Anesth. Analg. 94: 194-8, 2002. 7.Cox CR, Checketts MR, Mackenzie N, Scott NB, Bannister J. Comparison of S (-)- bupivacaine with racemik (RS)- bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Br. J. Ana-esth. 80 (5): 594-8, 1998 May. 8.Liao RZ, Peng JH, Chen YX, Ou JY, Liang YP, Zhou S, Shi YW. Comparison of the block characteristics of levobupivacaine vs bupivacaine for unilateral spinal block. Di Yİ Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao. 25( 12): 1563-4, 1567, 2005 Dec. 9.Kopaez DJ, Allen HW, Thompson GE. A comparison of epidural levobupivacaine % 0.75 with racemik bupivacaine for lower abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. 90(3): 642-8, 2000 Mar. 10.Andrea Casati,,MD+, Elena Moizo, MD*, Chiara Marchetti, MD*, and Federico Vinciguerra, MD* Anesth. Analg. 99:1387-92, 2004. 11.P.Gautier, M. De Kock, L. Huberty, T. Demir, M. Izydorc- zic and B. Vanderick. Br. J. Anaesth., 91: 684-689, 2003. 12.M. Bay-Nielsen, B. Klarskov, K. Bech, J. Andersen and H. Kehlet. Br. J. Anaesth., 82:280-282, 1999. 13.Camorcia M, Capogna G, Columb MO. Minimum lokal analgesic doses of ropivacaine, levobupivacaine and bupivacaine for intrathecal labor analgesia. Anesthesiology. 102(3): 646-50, 2005 Mar. 14.Gristwood RW, Greaves JL. Levobupivacaine: a new safer long acting local anaesthetic agent. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 8(6): 861-76, 1999 Jun. 15.Burke D, Kennedy S, Bannister J. Spinal anesthesia with % 0.5 S(-)- bupivacaine for elective lower limb surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 24(6): 519-23, 1999 Nov-Dec. 16.Casti A, Fanelli G, Marco B. Cardiac performance during unilateral lumbar spinal block after crystalloid preload. Can. J. Anaesth 1997 Jun;