SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry / 2009 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 1

Determination of homogenization performance of grinder used for aflatoxin analyses of Turkish hazelnuts

Meryem KARA
Cemalettin BALTACI
Rezzan ALİYAZICIOĞLU
Mustafa KARAMAN
Sevgi KOLAYLI
Oktay YILDIZ
Pages
33–39
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Variations among samples in both hazelnut groups were smaller than critical value of the statistical procedure of the Cochran test.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research was conducted to determine the homogeneity performance of laboratory grinder used for aflatoxin (Aflatoxin B1: AFB1; Aflatoxin B2: AFB2; Aflatoxin G1: AFG1; Aflatoxin G2: AFG2) analysis of hazelnut, one of the strategic products from the Black Sea Region.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Hazelnut samples in which aflatoxin (AFs) couldn't be detected by the analytical procedure were treated with standard solutions of 10 pg mL-1 AFB1, 5 pg mL"1 AFB2, 10 pg mL"1 AFG1, 5 pg mL"1 AFG2 at the levels of 2 mL, 0.6 mL, 4 mL and 1 mL, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Variations among samples in both hazelnut groups were smaller than critical value of the statistical procedure of the Cochran test.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This research was conducted to determine the homogeneity performance of laboratory grinder used for aflatoxin (Aflatoxin B1: AFB1; Aflatoxin B2: AFB2; Aflatoxin G1: AFG1; Aflatoxin G2: AFG2) analysis of hazelnut, one of the strategic products from the Black Sea Region. For the research, naturally aflatoxins-contaminated hazelnut samples in their unshelled state (A) and non-contaminated unshelled hazelnut samples (B) were used. Hazelnut samples in which aflatoxin (AFs) couldn't be detected by the analytical procedure were treated with standard solutions of 10 pg mL-1 AFB1, 5 pg mL"1 AFB2, 10 pg mL"1 AFG1, 5 pg mL"1 AFG2 at the levels of 2 mL, 0.6 mL, 4 mL and 1 mL, respectively. Then, hazelnut samples treated with AFs were grounded in laboratory grinders after 30 min of resting. The Cochran test procedure was applied to duplicate results to determine sufficient homogeneity of grinder. Variations among samples in both hazelnut groups were smaller than critical value of the statistical procedure of the Cochran test.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARA, M., BALTACI, C., ALİYAZICIOĞLU, R., KARAMAN, M., KOLAYLI, S., YILDIZ, O. (2022). Determination of homogenization performance of grinder used for aflatoxin analyses of Turkish hazelnuts. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 1, 33–39. https://ajindex.com/articles/651230

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. und, E., Massart, D.L. and Smeyers-Verbeke, J.S., Inter-Laboratory studies in analytical chemistry, J. Anal. Chim. Acta, 423, 145, 2000. 2.Thompson, M., Ellison Stephen, L.R. and Wood, R., The international harmonized protocol for the proficiency testing of analytical chemistry laboratories, IUPAC Technical Report. Pure and Appl. Chem. 78, 145, 2006. 3.Bushby, W.F. and Wogan, G.N. In: Chemical carcinogens, editor, F. Edwards, New York, NY: Mapple Pres. 1984. 4.Banwart, G.J., In: Basic Food Microbiology, editor, G.J. Banwart, New York, NY: AVI. 1989. 5.Fung, F. and Clark, R.F., Health effects of mycotoxins: a toxicological overview. J. Toxicol.-Clin. Toxicol. 42, 217, 2004. 6.Kotsonis, F.N., Burdock, G.A. and Flamm, W.G., In: Cassarett and Doull's Toxicology: The Basic Science öf Poisons, editor, C.D. Klaassen, New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Co. 1996. 7.Kotsonis, F.N., Burdock, G.A. and Flamm, W.G., İn: 16. Cassarett and Doull's Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons, editor, C.D. Klaassen, New York, NY: Pergamon Pres. 2001. 8.Creppy, E.E., Uptake of survey, regulation and toxic effect of mycotoxins in Europe, Toxicol. Lett. 127, 19, 2002. 9.Richard, J.L., Payne, G.A., Desjardin, A.E., Maragos, C., Norred, W.P., Pestka, J.J., Phillips, T.D., Van Egmond, H.P., Vardon, P.J., Whitaker, T.B. and Wood, G„ CAST Task Force Report 139. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. Ames, Iowa, USA, 2003. 10.Nelson, T.S., Jhonson, Z.B., Kirby, L.K. and Beasley, J.N., Digestion of dry matter, amino acids and energy utilization by chicks fed molded corn containing mycotoxins, J. Poultry Sci. 35, 584, 1982. 11.Ayhan, K. and Gürgün, V., Gıdalar ve Mikrobiyolojik Riskler II, Gıda Dergisi 21, 159, 1996. 12.Anderson, D., FAPAS Proficiency Test 0497, Aflatoxin Analysis in Maize. November 2006-January 2007 Report, 2007. 13.Reif, K. and Wolfgang, W., Determination of aflatoxins in medicinal herbs and plant extracts, J. Chrom.A, 692,131, 1995. 14.Tabata, S., Kamimura, H., Ibe, A., Hashimoto, H., lida, M., Tamura, Y. and Nishima, T., Aflatoxin contamination in foods and foodstuffs in Tokyo: 1986-1990, Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (JAOAC), 76, 32, 1993. 15.World Health Organization. Aflatoxins. Safety evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants. WHO Food Additive Series No. 40. Report of the 49th Meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives ( JECFA). Geneva: WHO. 1998. 16.Wang, J.S. and Tang, L., J. Toxicol.-To