Journals / Erciyes Tıp Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2

Zayıf over yanıtlı olgularda GnRH-agonist mikrodoz flare protokol ile multidoz GnRH- antagonist protokollerinin ICSI sonuçlarına etkileri

Comparison of GnRH-agonist microdose flare-up protocol and flexible multiple dose antagonistic protocol in poor responder patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle

Pages
52–55
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In view of its lower cost and yielding higher total and mature oocytes, GnRH antagonist could be preferred to the microdose flare protocol.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare the efficacy of the microdose flare-up and multiple-dose antagonist protocols for poor responder patients in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Of 1927 patients who had undergone ICSI cycles in the Erciyes University Department of Assisted Reproduction between 2005- 2012, 216 poor responder patients were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In view of its lower cost and yielding higher total and mature oocytes, GnRH antagonist could be preferred to the microdose flare protocol.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005- 2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of the microdose flare-up and multiple-dose antagonist protocols for poor responder patients in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Materials and Methods: Of 1927 patients who had undergone ICSI cycles in the Erciyes University Department of Assisted Reproduction between 2005- 2012, 216 poor responder patients were included in the study. There were 69 patients in the microdose flare-up group, and 147 patients- in the antagonist group. The groups were compared in terms of cycle parameters, and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR). Results: The groups were identical with regard to demographic parameters, with the exception of duration of infertility, which was significantly longer in the microdose group (12.10±5.87 years 9.32±5.57 years). No significant difference was found between groups in terms of gonadotropin- doses, E2 levels, endometrial thickness and pattern. Total and mature oocyte numbers were higher in the antagonist group (3.97±3.66 vs 5.41±4.65, and, 2.88±3.15 vs 4.27±3.78, respectively). CPRs were comparable between groups (%10.1 vs %19). Conclusion: Microdose GnRH-a flare-up and multiple dose GnRH antagonist protocols have similar CPR in poor responder patients undergoing ICSI cycles. In view of its lower cost and yielding higher total and mature oocytes, GnRH antagonist could be preferred to the microdose flare protocol.

Özet

Amaç: İntrasitoplazmik sperm injeksiyonu (ICSI) yapılan zayıf over yanıtlı olguların kontrollü ovaryan stimulasyon sikluslarında mikrodoz flare-up ile multidoz GnRH-antagonist protokollerinin karşılaştırılması. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Erciyes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Tüp Bebek Ünitesi’nde 2005-2012 yılları arasında ICSI yapılan 1927 olgudan zayıf over yanıtı olan 216 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastalar mikrodoz GnRH-agonist flare-up (Grup 1, n:69), GnRH- antagonist (Grup 2, n:147) olarak gruplandı. Gruplar kullanılan siklus parametreleri ve klinik gebelik oranları açısından karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Demografik ve klinik verilerin karşılaştırılmasında, gruplar arasında infertilite süresi (12,10±5,87 yıl vs 9,32±5,57 yıl) dışında anlamlı fark izlenmedi. İki grup arasında, gonadotropin dozu, E2 düzeyi, endometrial kalınlık/patern parametreleri açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark izlenmezken, total ve matür oosit sayısı antagonist grubunda anlamlı derecede yüksek bulundu (3,97±3,66 vs 5,41±4,65, ve 2,88±3,15 vs 4,27±3,78, p

🔖

Cite This Article

DOLANBAY, M., KÜTÜK, M. S., AYGEN, E., ULUDAĞ, S., ALTUN, Ö., TUNCAY, M., ŞAHİN, Y. (2022). Zayıf over yanıtlı olgularda GnRH-agonist mikrodoz flare protokol ile multidoz GnRH- antagonist protokollerinin ICSI sonuçlarına etkileri. Erciyes Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2, 52–55. https://ajindex.com/articles/650116

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Garcia JE, Jones GS, Acosta AA, Wright G Jr. Human menopausal gonadotropin/human chorionic gonadotropin follicular maturation for oocyte aspiration: phase II, 1981. Fertil Steril 1983; 39(2): 174-9
  2. Loutradis D, Drakakis P Milingos S, Stefanidis K, Michalas S. Alternative approaches in the management of poor response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). Ann N Y Acad Sci 2003; 997: 112-9. [CrossRef] 3. Ferraretti AP La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L, et al. ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response’ to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod 2011; 26(7): 1616-24. [CrossRef] 4. Surrey ES. Management of the poor responder: the role of GnRH agonists and antagonists. J Assist Reprod Genet 2007; 24(12): 613-9. [CrossRef] 5. Tarlatzis BC, Zepiridis L, Grimbizis G, Bontis J. Clinical management of low ovarian response to stimulation for IVF: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2003; 9(1): 61-76. [CrossRef] 6. Surrey ES, Schoolcraft WB. Evaluating strategies for improving ovarian response of the poor responder undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Fertil Steril 2000; 73(4): 667-76. [CrossRef] 7. Mahutte NG, Arici A. Poor responders: does the protocol make a difference? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002; 14(3): 275-81. [CrossRef] 8. Shanbhag S, Aucott L, Bhattacharya S, Hamilton MA, McTavish AR. Interventions for ‘’poor responders’’ to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in in-vitro fertilisation (IVF). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 24(1): CD004379
  3. Scott RT, Navot D. Enhancement of ovarian responsiveness with microdoses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist during ovulation induction for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1994; 61(5): 880-5
  4. Schoolcraft W, Schlenker T, Gee M, Stevens J, Wagley L. Improved controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in poor responder in vitro fertilization patients with a microdose follicle-stimulating hormone flare, growth hormone protocol. Fertil Steril 1997; 67(1): 93-7. [CrossRef] 11. Surrey ES, Bower J, Hill DM, Ramsey J, Surrey MW. Clinical and Endocrine Effects of a Microdose GnRH Agonist Flare Regimen Administered to Poor Responders Who Are Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization. Fertil Steril 1998; 69(3): 419-24. [CrossRef] 12. Demirol A, Gurgan T. Comparison of microdose flare-up and antagonist multiple-dose protocols for poor-responder patients: a randomized study. Fertil Steril 2009; 92(2): 481-5. [CrossRef] 13. Akm