SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

Which Polishing Method is Effective for Coffee Stains? – An in Vitro Study of Surface Roughness and Color Change

Cansu Atalay
Alperen Oz
Mirna Abou Ibrahim
Moath Shaqar
Marah Tayyem
Huthaifa Abdul Qader
Guliz Nigar Guncu
Ali Tugrul Gur
Pages
575–581
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In Group II, post-polishing Ra values were significantly increased in all groups (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To assess the effects of three different polishing protocols on the surface roughness and color change of the enamel and compare the results with the enamel specimens exposed to coffee.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: At baseline measurements, no significant differences were found among groups in terms of roughness and color values (p>0.05).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In Group II, post-polishing Ra values were significantly increased in all groups (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effects of three different polishing protocols on the surface roughness and color change of the enamel and compare the results with the enamel specimens exposed to coffee. Methods: Seventy-two bovine enamel specimens were randomly divided into two groups-Group I: only polishing, Group II: immersion in coffee solution and polishing–which were then subdivided into three groups according to polishing procedures as follows: polishing with rubber cup and Pumice Flour (PF), polishing with rubber cup and Prophy Paste (PP), polishing with Air Abrasion (AA). Surface roughness (Ra) and tooth color were assessed using a surface profilometer and a digital spectrophotometer. The color change was determined by the CIE L*a*b* system. One specimen from each group was also examined by SEM. Statistical analyses were performed by GraphPad software. Kruskal-Wallis and Friedman tests were used for multiple comparisons between-groups and in-groups, respectively. Results: At baseline measurements, no significant differences were found among groups in terms of roughness and color values (p>0.05). In Group I, surface roughness values and color change were similar after polishing (p=0.393, p=0.093, respectively). In Group II, post-polishing Ra values were significantly increased in all groups (p

🔖

Cite This Article

Atalay, C., Oz, A., Ibrahim, M. A., Shaqar, M., Tayyem, M., Qader, H. A., Guncu, G. N., Gur, A. T. (2022). Which Polishing Method is Effective for Coffee Stains? – An in Vitro Study of Surface Roughness and Color Change. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 575–581. https://ajindex.com/articles/649336

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Barnes CM. The science of polishing. Dimen Dent Hyg 2009;7:1822
  2. Patil SS, Rakhewar PS, Limaye PS, Chaudhari NP. A comparative evaluation of plaque-removing efficacy of air polishing and rubber-cup, bristle brush with paste polishing on oral hygiene status: A clinical study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2015;5(6):457-462
  3. Kimyai S, Mohammadi N, Alizadeh Oskoee P, PournaghiAzar F, Ebrahimi Chararrom ME, Amini M. Effect of different prophylaxis methods on microleakage of microfilled composite restorations. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2012;6(2):65-69
  4. Kimyai S, Savadi-Oskoee S, Ajami AA, Sadr A, Asdagh S. Effect of three prophylaxis methods on surface roughness of giomer. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16(1):e110-4
  5. Petersilka GJ, Bell M, Haberlein I, Mehl A, Hickel R, Flemmig TF. In vitro evaluation of novel low abrasive air polishing powders. J Clin Periodontol 2003;30(1):9-13
  6. Roulet JF, Roulet-Mehrens TK. The surface roughness of restorative materials and dental tissues after polishing with prophylaxis and polishing pastes. J Periodontol 1982;53(4):257-266
  7. Badersten A, Nilveus R, Egelberg J. Effect of nonsurgical periodontal therapy. II. Severely advanced periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 1984;11(1):63-76
  8. Salami D, Luz MA. Effect of prophylactic treatments on the superficial roughness of dental tissues and of two esthetic restorative materials. Pesqui Odontol Bras 2003;17(1):63-68
  9. Castanho GM, Arana-Chavez VE, Fava M. Roughness of human enamel surface submitted to different prophylaxis methods. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008;32(4):299-303
  10. Guler AU, Yilmaz F, Kulunk T, Guler E, Kurt S. Effects of different drinks on stainability of resin composite provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94(2):118-124
  11. Azer SS, Hague AL, Johnston WM. Effect of pH on tooth discoloration from food colorant in vitro. J Dent 2010;38 Suppl 2:e106-109
  12. Klein OD, Duverger O, Shaw W, et al. Meeting report: a hard look at the state of enamel research. Int J Oral Sci 2017;9(11):e3
  13. Karda B, Jindal R, Mahajan S, Sandhu S, Sharma S, Kaur R. To Analyse the Erosive Potential of Commercially Available Drinks on Dental Enamel and Various Tooth Coloured Restorative Materials – An In-vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10(5):ZC117-21
  14. Bazzi JZ, Bindo MJ, Rached RN, Mazur RF, Vieira S, de Souza EM. The effect of at-home bleaching and toothbrushing on removal of coffee and cigarette smoke stains and color st