Journals / BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL / 2022 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreements of the Detection of Demodex Infestation by in Vivo Confocal Microscopy

Pages
173–180
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the hands of an experienced clinician, IVCM could be reliable for the diagnosis of ocular demodicosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The purpose of the study was to determine interobserver and intraobserver agreement, repeatability, and intrasubject variation of the detection of Demodex infestation in eyelids of blepharitis patients using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Eighty-three eyes of 42 blepharitis patients were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the hands of an experienced clinician, IVCM could be reliable for the diagnosis of ocular demodicosis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of the study was to determine interobserver and intraobserver agreement, repeatability, and intrasubject variation of the detection of Demodex infestation in eyelids of blepharitis patients using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM). Methods: Eighty-three eyes of 42 blepharitis patients were included in the study. All eyelids were evaluated from temporal to nasal with IVCM using section mode and 10 lashes with their follicles were imagined, and every image with suspicion of Demodex infestation was recorded. Two experienced and two inexperienced ophthalmologists were masked for the diagnosis and interpreted the IVCM images regarding the presence of Demodex infestation with a 3-week interval. Interobserver and intraobserver agreements were calculated with Cohen’s kappa and its variant statistics between and within experienced observers and between inexperienced observers. Results: While average sensitivity for the diagnosis of demodicosis in IVCM images was 83.35% for experienced and 51.35% for inexperienced observers, the average positive predictive value was 88.6% for experienced observers and 91.05% for inexperienced ones. Interobserver agreement between experienced observers was moderate (κ = 0.529) and intraobserver agreements within experienced observers were perfect (κ = 0.918 for observer-1; κ = 0.958 for observer- 2). Interobserver agreement between inexperienced observers was poor (κ = 0.162) and intraobserver agreements within inexperienced observers were fair (κ = 0.427 for observer-3; κ = 0.475 for observer-4). Conclusion: The sensitivity, interobserver and intraobserver agreements in IVCM image analysis for the detection of Demodex infestation were highly associated with the clinical experience on IVCM imaging. In the hands of an experienced clinician, IVCM could be reliable for the diagnosis of ocular demodicosis.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞ, A. Y., MERGEN, B., YILDIZ, E., BAYRAKTURAR, B. N., ÇELİK, E., ŞAHİN, A., ARICI, C. (2022). Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreements of the Detection of Demodex Infestation by in Vivo Confocal Microscopy. BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 173–180. https://ajindex.com/articles/649047

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Bernardes TF, Bonfioli AA. Blepharitis. Semin Ophthalmol 2010;25:79–83
  2. Lemp MA, Nichols KK. Blepharitis in the United States 2009: A survey-based perspective on prevalence and treatment. Ocul Surf 2009;7:S1–14
  3. Venturino G, Bricola G, Bagnis A, Traverso CE. Chronic blepharitis: Treatment patterns and prevalence. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:774–9
  4. Mathers WD, Shields WJ, Sachdev MS, Petroll WM, Jester JV. Meibomian gland dysfunction in chronic blepharitis. Cornea 1991;10:277–85
  5. Dougherty JM, McCulley JP. Comparative bacteriology of chronic blepharitis. Br J Ophthalmol 1984;68:524–8
  6. O’Brien TP. The role of bacteria in blepharitis. Ocul Surf 2009;7:S21–2
  7. Malerbi FK, Martins LC, Saldiva PH, Braga AL. Ambient levels of air pollution induce clinical worsening of blepharitis. Environ Res 2012;112:199–203
  8. Luo X, Li J, Chen C, Tseng S, Liang L. Ocular demodicosis as a potential cause of ocular surface ınflammation. Cornea 2017;36:S9–14
  9. Zhao YE, Wu LP, Hu L, Xu JR. Association of blepharitis with demodex: A meta-analysis. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2012;19:95– 102
  10. Desch CE. Human hair follicle mites and forensic acarology. Exp Appl Acarol 2009;49:143–6
  11. Elston CA, Elston DM. Demodex mites. Clin Dermatol 2014;32:739–43
  12. Nicholls SG, Oakley CL, Tan A, Vote BJ. Demodex species in human ocular disease: New clinicopathological aspects. Int Ophthalmol 2017;37:303–12
  13. Lee SH, Chun YS, Kim JH, Kim ES, Kim JC. The relationship between demodex and ocular discomfort. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:2906–11
  14. English FP, Nutting WB. Demodicosis of ophthalmic concern. Am J Ophthalmol 1981;91:362–72
  15. Liu J, Sheha H, Tseng SC. Pathogenic role of demodex mites in blepharitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2010;10:505–10
  16. Georgala S, Katoulis AC, Kylafis GD, Koumantaki-Mathioudaki E, Georgala C, Aroni K. Increased density of Demodex folliculorum and evidence of delayed hypersensitivity reaction in subjects with papulopustular rosacea. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2001;15:441–4
  17. Clifford CW, Fulk GW. Association of diabetes, lash loss, and Staphylococcus aureus with infestation of eyelids by Demodex folliculorum (Acari: Demodicidae). J Med Entomol 1990;27:467–70
  18. Cheng AM, Sheha H, Tseng SC. Recent advances on ocular Demodex infestation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2015;26:295–300
  19. Gao YY, Di Pascuale MA, Li W, Liu DT, Baradaran-Rafii A, Elizondo A, et al. High prevalence of Demodex in eyelashes with cylindrical dan