SavedAdd your journal

Journals / BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL / 2022 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of Sudden Visual Loss and Central 10-Degree Visual Field Change Following Glaucoma Surgery in Severe and End-Stage Eyes

Alev ÖZÇELİK KÖSE
Mehmet Serhat MANGAN
Sevcan YILDIZ BALCI
Nursal Melda YENEREL
Serhat İMAMOĞLU
Hatice TEKCAN
Pages
181–187
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In SFG, the mean intraocular pressure (IOP) decreased from 30.1±9.5 mmHg to 12.3±0.62 mmHg (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the sudden visual loss and central 10-degree visual field (VF) change following glaucoma surgery in eyes with severe and end-stage glaucoma.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients who had 10-2 Humphrey VF automated (HVFA) at follow-up were included and classified into two following groups: With split fixation on 10-2 HVFA before surgery split fixation group (SFG) and those without split fixation (WSFG).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In SFG, the mean intraocular pressure (IOP) decreased from 30.1±9.5 mmHg to 12.3±0.62 mmHg (p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the sudden visual loss and central 10-degree visual field (VF) change following glaucoma surgery in eyes with severe and end-stage glaucoma. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study. The charts of patients with severe and end-stage glaucoma who had undergone trabeculectomy and Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation surgery were reviewed. Patients who had 10-2 Humphrey VF automated (HVFA) at follow-up were included and classified into two following groups: With split fixation on 10-2 HVFA before surgery split fixation group (SFG) and those without split fixation (WSFG). Results: The data of 37 patients in SFG and 28 patients in WSFG were reviewed. The mean follow-up duration was 2.06±0.24 years in SFG and 2±0.3 years in WSFG. 10-2 HVFA revealed that SFG had a mean MD –25.8±5.2 dB preoperatively and –25.2±1.1 dB (p=0.18) at last visit, WSFG had a mean MD −9.8±4.8 dB preoperatively and −10.8±1.5 dB at last visit (p=0.10). In SFG, the mean intraocular pressure (IOP) decreased from 30.1±9.5 mmHg to 12.3±0.62 mmHg (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖSE, A. Ö., MANGAN, M. S., BALCI, S. Y., YENEREL, N. M., İMAMOĞLU, S., TEKCAN, H. (2022). Evaluation of Sudden Visual Loss and Central 10-Degree Visual Field Change Following Glaucoma Surgery in Severe and End-Stage Eyes. BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 181–187. https://ajindex.com/articles/649074

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Caprioli J, Coleman AL. Intraocular pressure fluctuation a risk factor for visual field progression at low intraocular pressures in the advanced glaucoma intervention study. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1123–9.e3
  2. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Hoffman D, Coleman AL, Liu G, Li G, Gaasterland D, et al. Predictive factors for glaucomatous visual field progression in the advanced glaucoma intervention study. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1627–35
  3. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Hussein M. Early manifest glaucoma trial group. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: Results from the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:1268–79
  4. Kolker AE. Visual prognosis in advanced glaucoma: A comparison of medical and surgical therapy for retention of vision in 101 eyes with advanced glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1977;75:539–55
  5. Aggarwal SP, Hendeles S. Risk of sudden visual loss following trabeculectomy in advanced primary open-angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1986;70:97–9
  6. Otto J. Loss of point of fixation after glaucoma surgery. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1957;131:178–95
  7. Costa VP, Smith M, Spaeth GL, Gandham S, Markovitz B. Loss of visual acuity after trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology 1993;100:599–612
  8. Fujishiro T, Mayama C, Aihara M, Tomidokoro A, Araie M. Central 10-degree visual field change following trabeculectomy in advanced open-angle glaucoma. Eye (Lond) 2011;25:866–71
  9. Topouzis F, Tranos P, Koskosas A, Pappas T, Anastasopoulos E, Dimitrakos S, et al. Risk of sudden visual loss following filtration surgery in end-stage glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;140:661–6
  10. Lichter PR, Ravin JG. Risks of sudden visual loss after glaucoma surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 1974;78:1009–13
  11. Martinez JA, Brown RH, Lynch MG, Caplan MB. Risk of postoperative visual loss in advanced glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1993;115:332–37
  12. Balekudaru S, George R, Panday M, Singh M, Neog A, Lingam V. Prospective evaluation of early visual loss following glaucoma filtering surgery in eyes with split fixation. J Glaucoma 2014;23:211–8
  13. Moster MR, Moster ML. Wipe out: A complication of glaucoma surgery or just a blast from the past? Am J Ophthalmol 2005;140:705–6
  14. Popovic V, Sjöstrand J. Long-term outcome following trabeculectomy: II. Acta Ophthalmol 1991;69:305–9
  15. Rao HL, Begum VU, Khadka D, Mandal AK, Senthil S, Garudadri CS. Comparing glaucoma progression on 24-2 and 10-2 visual field examinations. PLoS One 2015;10:e0127233. 1