Journals / BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL / 2022 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy

Pages
134–139
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Physicians and professional organizations should be aware of and embrace this evolving technology to raise awareness about FECD.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the quality and reliability of videos on Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) on YouTube.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The first 100 videos were recorded.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Physicians and professional organizations should be aware of and embrace this evolving technology to raise awareness about FECD.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the quality and reliability of videos on Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) on YouTube. Methods: A search of YouTube was performed for the term “FECD” without any changes to the website’s standard search preferences. The first 100 videos were recorded. A total of 71 videos were evaluated regarding the DISCERN score (min–max: 16–75), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score (min–max: 0–4), and Global Quality Scale (GQS) score (min–max: 0–5). Results: The mean DISCERN score was 40.1±15.6 (moderate), the mean JAMA score was 2.01±0.7 (poor), the mean GQS score was 2.5±1.3 (moderate), and the mean video power index score was 106.8±135.7. Twenty-three of the videos (32.4%) were uploaded by physicians, 25 (35.2%) by universities/private hospitals, and 21 (29.6%) by health channels. Thirty- six videos (50.7%) contained information about the disease, 24 (33.8%) discussed surgical techniques, and 11 (15.5%) were about patient experience. Conclusion: YouTube provides only moderate-quality health information on FECD. Physicians and professional organizations should be aware of and embrace this evolving technology to raise awareness about FECD.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOLAÇ, R., ÖZTÜRK, Y., YILDIZ, E. (2022). Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy. BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 134–139. https://ajindex.com/articles/649071

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Wasserman M, Baxter NN, Rosen B, Burnstein M, Halverson AL. Systematic review of internet patient information on colorectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2014;57:64–9
  2. Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the accuracy and quality of the information in kyphosis videos shared on YouTube. Spine 2018;43:1334–9
  3. Mangan MS, Cakir A, Yurttaser Ocak S, Tekcan H, Balci S, Ozcelik Kose A. Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube. Strabismus 2020;28:175–80
  4. Matthaei M, Hribek A, Clahsen T, Bachmann B, Cursiefen C, Jun AS. Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: Clinical, genetic, pathophysiologic, and therapeutic aspects. Annu Rev Vis Sci 2019;5:151–75
  5. Sarnicola C, Farooq AV, Colby K. Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: Update on pathogenesis and future directions. Eye Contact Lens 2019;45:1–10
  6. Gain P, Jullienne R, He Z, Aldossary M, Acquart S, Cognasse F, et al. Global survey of corneal transplantation and eye banking. JAMA Ophthalmol 2016;134:167–73
  7. Blitzer AL, Colby KA. Update on the surgical management of fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. Ophthalmol Ther 2020;9:757–65
  8. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis--a wakeup call? J Rheumatol 2012;39:899–903
  9. Schallhorn SC, Hannan SJ, Teenan D, Pelouskova M, Schallhorn JM. Informed consent in refractive surgery: In-person vs telemedicine approach. Clin Ophthalmol 2018;12:2459
  10. Pager C. Randomised controlled trial of preoperative information to improve satisfaction with cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:10–3
  11. Shukla AN, Daly MK, Legutko P. Informed consent for cataract surgery: Patient understanding of verbal, written, and videotaped information. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012;38:80–4
  12. Kuçuk B, Sirakaya E. An analysis of YouTube videos as educational resources for patients about refractive surgery. Cornea 2020;39:491–4
  13. Şahin A, Şahin M, Türkcü FM. YouTube as a source of information in retinopathy of prematurity. Ir J Med Sci 2019;188:613–7
  14. Guthrie G, Davies R, Fleming C, Browning AC. YouTube as a source of information about retinitis pigmentosa. Eye 2014;28:499
  15. Hickman SJ. An evaluation of educational neurological eye movement disorder videos posted on internet video sharing sites. J Neuroophthalmol 2016;36:33–6
  16. Azer SA. Are DISCERN and JAMA suitable instruments for assessing YouTube videos on thyroid cancer? Methodological concerns. J Cancer Educ 2020;35:1267–77. 17.