SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 39

THE ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL CYNICISM IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT BREACH AND INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOR

PSİKOLOJİK SÖZLEŞME İHLALİ İLE YENİLİKÇİ İŞ DAVRANIŞI İLİŞKİSİNDE ÖRGÜTSEL SİNİZMİN ROLÜ

Oytun Boran SEZGİN
Zeki UÇAR
Pages
225–248
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, organizational cynicism has a mediating role in the relationship between psychological contract breach and innovative work behavior.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of organizational cynicism in the relationship between psychological contract breach and innovative work behavior.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Accordingly, data was collected from 240 employees in Bitlis through written questionnaire.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, organizational cynicism has a mediating role in the relationship between psychological contract breach and innovative work behavior.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of organizational cynicism in the relationship between psychological contract breach and innovative work behavior. Accordingly, data was collected from 240 employees in Bitlis through written questionnaire. Confrmatory factor analysis, correlation, regression and structural equation models were used. According to the results, organizational cynicism has a mediating role in the relationship between psychological contract breach and innovative work behavior. Employees can create negative attitudes towards their organizations with the thoughts that their managers / organizations have deceived them when promises to them are not fulflled. These negative attitudes can prevent employees from exhibiting innovative work behaviors that will beneft their organizations. It is thought that the study will contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of innovative work behaviors that are crucial for organizations.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı psikolojik sözleşme ihlali ile yenilikçi iş davranışı ilişkisinde örgütsel sinizmin rolünü araştırmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, Bitlis ilinde çalışan 240 kişiden yazılı soru sorma yoluyla veri toplanmıştır. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi, korelasyon, regresyon ve yapısal eşitlik modelleri ile değişkenler arası ilişkiler test edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, psikolojik sözleşme ihlali ile yenilikçi iş davranışı ilişkisinde örgütsel sinizm aracılık rolündedir. Çalışanlar kendilerine verilen sözler yerine getirilmediği zaman, yöneticilerinin/örgütlerinin kendilerini kandırdığı düşünceleri ile örgütlerine yönelik olumsuz tutumlar oluşturabilmektedirler. Söz konusu olumsuz tutumlar, çalışanların örgütlerine yarar sağlayacak yenilikçi iş davranışları sergilemelerine engel olabilmektedir. Örgütler açısından hayati öneme sahip yenilikçi iş davranışlarının anlaşılmasına yönelik olarak çalışmanın katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

SEZGİN, O. B., UÇAR, Z. (2022). THE ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL CYNICISM IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT BREACH AND INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOR. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 39, 225–248. https://ajindex.com/articles/647162

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Agarwal, U. A. (2014). “Examining the impact of social exchange relationships on innovative work behaviour”, Team Performance Management, 20(3/4), 102-120.
  2. Agarwal, U. A. (2017). “Linking psychological contract breach, innovative work behaviour and collectivism: A Moderated Mediation Model”, International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(7), 1-31.
  3. Ajzen, I. (1989). “Attitude structure and behavior”, Attitude Structure and Function, 241, 274. Andersson, L. M. (1996). “Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework”, Human Relations, 49(11), 1395-1418.
  4. Amabile, T. M. (1988). “A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations”, Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
  5. Ancona, D., & Caldwell, D. (1987). “Management issues facing new product teams in high technology companies”, Erişim Adresi: https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/48349/managementissues00anco.pdf?s. (02.06.2020)
  6. Andersson, L. M. (1996). “Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework”. Human Relations, 49(11): 1395-1418.
  7. Awang, Z. (2012). Structural equation modeling using AMOS graphic. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Teknologi MARA. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). “The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  8. Bashir, S., & Nasir, M. (2013). Breach of psychological contract, organizational cynicism and union commitment: A study of hospitality industry in Pakistan, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 34, 61-65. Beugré, C. D. (2010), “Brain and human behavior in organizations: A feld of neuro-organizational behavior”, Neuroeconomics and The Firm, 289-301,
  9. Ed. Stanton A. A., Day, M. ve Welpe M. I., Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing. Byrne, J. A. (1991). “The fap over executive pay”, Business Week, 6(5), 90-96.
  10. Bysted, R. (2013). “Innovative employee behaviour: the moderating effects of mental ınvolvement and job satisfaction on contextual variables”, European Journal of Innovation Management, 16(3), 268-284.
  11. Bommer, W. H., Rich, G. A., & Rubin, R. S. (2005). “Changing attitudes about change: Longitudinal effects of transformational leader behavior on employee cynicism about organizational change”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(7), 733-753.
  12. Chaloupka, W. (1999). Everybody Knows: Cynicism in America, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Pr