Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3

Reflection of Neuroscience on Organizational Behaviour: Orgazational Neuroscience

Nörobilimin Örgütsel Davranışa Yansıması: Örgütsel Nörobilim

Pages
353–366
Publication Date
2015-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Particularly, using neuroimaging techniques beside psycho-technique evaluations will broaden the perspectives of managerial and scientific perspectives and will open new doors

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:From the years 1990s -that management and organization field laid its foundations- to today, various of studies have been done in different units and levels of analysis which were inspired directly or indirectly by metaphorical approaches conducted at the level of individual, group, organizations and the population.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These studies take into account of the interactions in human brain and fill a hole in the literature of management and organization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Particularly, using neuroimaging techniques beside psycho-technique evaluations will broaden the perspectives of managerial and scientific perspectives and will open new doors
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Örgütsel Davranış · Nörobilim · Örgütsel Nörobilim

Abstract

From the years 1990s -that management and organization field laid its foundations- to today, various of studies have been done in different units and levels of analysis which were inspired directly or indirectly by metaphorical approaches conducted at the level of individual, group, organizations and the population. These studies take into account of the interactions in human brain and fill a hole in the literature of management and organization. Organizational neuroscience, a science which has gained importance and secured its position recently, brought a much richer perspective to the management and organization field as using neuroimaging techniques. Particularly, using neuroimaging techniques beside psycho-technique evaluations will broaden the perspectives of managerial and scientific perspectives and will open new doors

Özet

Örgüt ve yönetim biliminin temellerinin atıldığı 1900’lü yılların başından günümüze kadar birey, grup, örgüt ve popülasyon düzeyinde doğrudan ve dolaylı olarak metaforik yaklaşımlardan esinlenen sayısız analiz birimi ve analiz düzeyinde çeşitli çalışmalar yapılmıştır. Bu farklı çalışmaların, insan beynindeki etkileşimleri dikkate almaması örgüt ve yönetim alanı içerisinde bir eksiklik olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Son günlerde önemi iyice açığa çıkan ve yazında yerini sağlamlaştıran örgütsel nörobilimin, nörogörüntüleme tekniklerinden faydalanarak bu alana çok daha zengin bir bakış açısı getirdiği bir gerçektir. Özellikle psikoteknik değerlendirmelerin yanında kullanılacak olan nörogörüntüleme tekniklerinin yönetimci ve bilimci bakış açılarını genişletecek ve yeni kapılar aralayacaktır

🔖

Cite This Article

SEZGİN, O. B., UÇAR, Z. (2015). Reflection of Neuroscience on Organizational Behaviour: Orgazational Neuroscience. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3, 353–366. https://ajindex.com/articles/904746

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Adolphs, R. (2003) “Cognitive neuroscience of hu- man social behaviour” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(3): 165-178.
  2. Agor, W. (1983) “Brain Skills Development in Ma- nagement Training” Training and Development Journal, 37(4): 78-83.
  3. Akpunar, B. (2011). Biliş Ve Üstbiliş (Metabiliş) Kav- ramlarının Zihin Felsefesi Açısından Analizi. Electronic Turkish Studies, 6(4): 353-365. Aziz‐Zadeh, L., Kaplan, J. T., ve Iacoboni, M. (2009) “ “Aha ”: The Neural Correlates of Verbal Insight Soluti- ons” Human Brain Mapping, 30(3): 908-916.
  4. Bagozzi, R. P., Verbeke, W. J., Dietvorst, R. C., Bels- chak, F. D., van den Berg, W. E., ve Rietdijk, W. J. (2013) “Theory of Mind and Empathic Explanations of Machia- vellianism A Neuroscience Perspective” Journal of Mana- gement, 39(7): 1760-1798.
  5. Balthazard, P. A., Waldman, D. A., Thatcher, R. W., ve Hannah, S. T. (2012) “Differentiating Transformati- onal and Non-Transformational Leaders on the Basis of Neurological Imaging” The Leadership Quarterly, 23(2): 244-258.
  6. Bandura, A. (1977) “Social Learning Theory. General Learning Press” New York City 10016. Bandura, A. (1988) “Organisational Applications of Social Cognitive Theory” Australian Journal of Manage- ment, 13(2): 275-302.
  7. Bear, M. F., Connors, B. W., ve Paradiso, M. A. (2007). “Neuroscience” Cilt:2, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Becker, W. J., ve Cropanzano, R. (2010) “Organi- zational Neuroscience: The Promise and Prospects of an Emerging Discipline” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(7): 1055-1059.
  8. Becker, W. J., Cropanzano, R., ve Sanfey, A. G. (2011) “Organizational Neuroscience: Taking Organi- zational Theory Inside the Neural Black Box” Journal of Management, 37(4): 933-961.
  9. Becker, W. ve Menges, J. I. (2013) “Biological Impli- cit Measures in HRM and OB: A Question of How Not if” Human Resource Management Review, 23(3):219–228. Beugré, C. D. (2009) “Exploring The Neural Basis of Fairness: A Model of Neuro-Organizational Justice” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Proces- ses,110(2): 129-139. Beugré, C.D. (2010) “Brain and Human Behavior in Organizations: A Field of Neuro-Organizational Behavi- or” Edited by Angela A. Stanton, Mellani Day and Isabell M.Welpe. Edward Elgar Publishing: Massachusetts USA 289-305.
  10. Bevan, W. (1991) “Contemporary Psychology: A Tour Inside the Onion” American Psychologist, 46(5): 475-483.
  11. Blakemore, S. J., Winston, J., ve Frith, U. (2004) “So- cial Cognitive Neuroscience: Where Are We Heading?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(5):