SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yeditepe Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 2-1 *dublicate*-18580

Roma hukukunda define

Treasure trove ın Roman law (Thesaurus)

H. Gökçe TÜRKOĞLU
Pages
455–464
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally it is seen that the legal arrangements brought by Romans in the field of treasure trove affect the modernlaw systems broadly and most part of them has been supersede by the Roman rules.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Acquiring ownership of the treasure is accepted as an original natural mode ofacquiring ownership.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Through the historical development of Roman law, treasuretrove was regulated in different ways and it was even discussed whether treasure trove was an ownerless thing (res nullius) or not and relating with this, the problems arising from treasure trove were solved with different methods.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally it is seen that the legal arrangements brought by Romans in the field of treasure trove affect the modernlaw systems broadly and most part of them has been supersede by the Roman rules.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Acquiring ownership of the treasure is accepted as an original natural mode ofacquiring ownership. Through the historical development of Roman law, treasuretrove was regulated in different ways and it was even discussed whether treasure trove was an ownerless thing (res nullius) or not and relating with this, the problems arising from treasure trove were solved with different methods. In this article, it is explained how the treasure trove was regulated in Roman law, which objects were considered as treasure and by which way their ownerships were acquired. Finally it is seen that the legal arrangements brought by Romans in the field of treasure trove affect the modernlaw systems broadly and most part of them has been supersede by the Roman rules.

Özet

Define, Roma hukukunda, mülkiyetin aslen iktisap yollarından biri olarak kabuledilmiştir. Roma hukukunun tarihsel gelişim dönemlerinde, define farklı biçimlerde düzenlenmiş, hatta sahipsiz mal (res nullius) sayılıp sayılmaması hususunda tartışmalar yaşanmış ve konuya ilişkin sorunlar farklı şekillerde çözülmüştür. Bu çalışmada, Roma hukukunda define kavramının nasıl düzenlendiği, nelerin define kapsamına girdiği ve hangi yollarla mülkiyetin kazanıldığı açıklanmaktadır. Roma hukukunda define hakkında getirilmiş olan yasal düzenlemelerin günümüz hukuk sistemlerini büyük ölçüde etkilediği ve bunların temelini oluşturduğu saptanmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKOĞLU, H. G. (2022). Roma hukukunda define. Yeditepe Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 2-1 *dublicate*-18580, 455–464. https://ajindex.com/articles/646884

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Berger A. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law, Philadelphia 1953.
  2. Bland R. “The Treasure Act and Portable Antiquities Scheme: A Progress Re port”, Art, Antiquity and Law, V. 4,1999, pp.191-203. Borkowski A.&Du Plessis P. Textbook on Roman Law, 3. Ed., Oxford 2005. Burdick W. The Principles of Roman Law and Their Relation to Modern Law, 3. Ed., New Jersey 2004. Buckland W. W. Elemantary Principles of the Roman Private Law, Cambridge 1912. (1) Buckland W. W. A Text-Book of Roman Law from Augustus to Justinian, 3. Ed. Cambridge 1932. (2) Carey Miller D. L. “Treasure Trove in Scots Law” in R. Van den Bergh ed., Summa Eloquentia: Essays in Honour of Margaret Hewet, Pretoria: Univ. of South Africa Press pp. 75-89. Carman J. Valuing Ancient Things: Archaeology and Law, New York 1996.
  3. Hill, G F. Treasure Trove in Law and Practice from Earliest Time to the Present Day, Oxford, 1939. Kaser M. Roman Private Law, 2. Ed. Transl. by R. Dannenbring, London 1968.
  4. Krys R. “Treasure Trove under Anglo-American Law”, Anglo-American Law Review, V. 11, 1982, pp. 214-240. Leage R. W. Leage’s Roman Private Law Founded on the Institutes of Gaius and Justinian, 3. Ed. by A. M. Prichard, London 1961. Lee R. W. The Elements of Roman Law, with a Translation of the Institutes of Justinian 4. Ed., London 1956. Mackeldey F. Handbook of the Roman Law, V.1, Philadelphia 1883. Nicholas B. An Intoduction to Roman Law, with a Foreword, Revised bibliog raphy, and Glossary of Latin terms by E. Metzger, Oxford 2008.
  5. Ruddy F. S. “Res Nullius and Occupation in Roman and International Law”, VUnv. Of Missouri Law Review, V.36, 1968, pp.247-287.
  6. Saville A. “The Law and Practice Regarding Coin Finds- The Treasure Trove System in Scotland- An Update”, Compte Rendu, V. 55, 2008, pp.13-17. (1) Saville A. “Treasure Trove and Metal Detecting in Scotland”, in Metal Detect ing and Archaeology. Heritage Matters, Suffolk 2009, pp. 87-98.(2) Spiller P. A Manual of Roman Law, Durban 1986.
  7. Schulz F. Classical Roman Law, Oxford 1951.
  8. Thomas J. A. C. Texbook of Roman Law, Amsterdam 1976. Van Warmelo P. An Introduction to the Principles of Roman Civil Law, Cape Town 1976.