Journals / Yeditepe Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Telif hakkı istisnası için uygulanan üç aşama testi: telif hakkı sahiplerinin menfaatlerini daha fazla gözetmektedir

"Three step test" for exceptions to copyrights places too much emphasis on the interests of the copyright owner

Pages
115–132
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The test asks whether there is 1) a presence of a certain special case 2) which does not conflict with the normal exploitation of the work and 3) which does not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the au- thor.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Three Step Test is a determination mechanism which aims to protect a copyright owner’s interests in the scope of intellectual property law for free or restricted use of a work.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Test tries to create an objec- tive standard in the event of conflicts between copyright owners and users.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The test asks whether there is 1) a presence of a certain special case 2) which does not conflict with the normal exploitation of the work and 3) which does not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the au- thor.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Three Step Test is a determination mechanism which aims to protect a copyright owner’s interests in the scope of intellectual property law for free or restricted use of a work. The Test tries to create an objec- tive standard in the event of conflicts between copyright owners and users. The three step analysis as an exception to the interests of copyright own- ers. The test asks whether there is 1) a presence of a certain special case 2) which does not conflict with the normal exploitation of the work and 3) which does not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the au- thor.

Özet

Üç aşama testi, telif hakkı sahiplerinin menfaatlerinin korunması ve bununla birlikte kamu menfaatinin de göz ardı edilmeyerek, fikri mülkiye- te konu olan eserin ücretsiz kullanılabilmesi amacına yönelik olan bir tes- pit mekanizmasıdır. Bir başka deyişle üç aşamalı bir inceleme ile telif hak- kı sahiplerinin menfaatlerine bir istisna olarak, telif hakkı ve kullanıcıların serbest kullanımının çekişmeli olduğu hallerde çözüme yönelik mümkün olduğunca nesnel bir çözüm ortaya koymaya çalışır. Üç aşamadan oluşan bu incelemede; mutlak ve özel bir halin varlığı, eserin olağan kullanımı ile çatışmayacak bir durumun söz konusu olması ve son olarak yazarın meşru menfaatlerine makul olmayan bir biçimde halel getirmemesi aranır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKIR, A. C. (2022). Telif hakkı istisnası için uygulanan üç aşama testi: telif hakkı sahiplerinin menfaatlerini daha fazla gözetmektedir. Yeditepe Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 115–132. https://ajindex.com/articles/646759

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Brennan, D.J., The Three Step Test Frenzy – Why the TRIPs Panel Decision might be considered Per Incuriam, The University of Melbourne Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper, 22, 2002, p. 8. Gervais, D.J., Towards a New Core International Copyright Norm: The Reverse Three-Step Test, Bepress Legal Series, 214, 2004, p. 12. Ginsburg, J., Toward Supranational Copyright Law? The WTO Panel Decision and The Three Step Test for Copyright Exceptions, RIDA 187(2), 2001, p. 14 Griffiths, J., The Three Step Test in European Copyright Law- Prob- lems and Solutions, Queen Mary University of London, School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper, 31, 2009, p. 4. Johnson, P., One Small Step or One Giant Leap?, E.I.P.R., 26(6), 2004, pp. 265-272.
  2. Koelman, K.J., Fixing the Three Step Test, E.I.P.R., 8, 2006, p. 408. Laurent, P., Copiepresse SCRL v. Google Inc. Case Note Article, Computer Law and Security Report, 23, 2007, pp. 290-293.
  3. Lucas, A., For a Reasonable Interpretation of the Three Step Test, E.I.P.R., 32(6), 2010 pp. 277-282.
  4. Ricketson, S., The Three Step Test, Deemed Quantities, Libraries and Closed Exceptions, Centre for Copyright Studies, Strawberry Hills NSW, 2002, p. 24. Senftleben, M., Copyright, Limitations and The Three Step Test: an Analysis of The Three Step Test in International and EC Copyright Law, Kluwer Law International, 2004, p. 137. Senftleben, M., Fair use in the Netherlands – A Renaissance?, AMI, 33(1), p. 7. Senftleben, M., The International Three Step Test: A Model Provi- sion for EC Fair Use Legislation, 1 JIPITEC, 2010, p. 68. Von Lewinsky, S. and Reinbothe, J., The WIPO Treaties 1996:
  5. Ready to Come in Force, E.I.P.R., 24, 2002, p. 204. Wright, R., The Three Step Test and the Wider Public Interest: To- wards a More Inclusive Interpretation, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 12(6), 2009, p. 601. List of Web Sites http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:320 01L0029:EN:HTML (Accessed: 11.03.2012). http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html (Accessed: 11.03.2012). http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds160_e.htm (Accessed: 13.03.2012).