SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 23

Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk düzeyinin işletmelerinfinansal performansına etkisinin incelenmesi: Bıst kurumsal yönetim endeksi üzerine bir uygulama

Analyzing the effects of corporate socialresponsibility level on the financial performance of companies: An application on bist corporate governance index included companies

Esen KARA
Duygu ERDUR ACAR
Pages
227–242
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, there is no meaningful relation between corporate socialresponsibility and companies total sales and return on sales ratio.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to analyze the relationship between corporate social responsibilitylevel and fnancial performance in a developing country, Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, fnancialdata derived from annual reports of the 33 companies included in BIST Corporate GovernanceIndex between years 2006-2012 has been analyzed with panel data analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, there is no meaningful relation between corporate socialresponsibility and companies total sales and return on sales ratio.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006-2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the relationship between corporate social responsibilitylevel and fnancial performance in a developing country, Turkey. For this purpose, fnancialdata derived from annual reports of the 33 companies included in BIST Corporate GovernanceIndex between years 2006-2012 has been analyzed with panel data analysis. According to theanalysis, there is a meaningful and positive relationship between corporate social responsibilityand market value/book value ratio, return on equity ratio, return on assets ratio, leverage ratioand net proft. On the other hand, there is no meaningful relation between corporate socialresponsibility and companies total sales and return on sales ratio.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı; gelişmekte olan bir ülke olarak Türkiyede işletmelerin kurumsalsosyal sorumluluk düzeyleri ile fnansal performansları arasındaki ilişkiyi analiz etmektir. Buamaçla BIST Kurumsal Yönetim endeksinde yer alan 33 işletmenin yıllık faaliyet raporlarındanelde edilen fnansal veriler panel veri analizi ile analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre,işletmelerin kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk düzeyleri ile piyasa değeri/defter değeri oranı,özsermaye karlılığı oranı, aktif karlılığı oranı, kaldıraç oranı ve net kârı arasında pozitif veanlamlı ilişki olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Diğer taraftan, işletmelerin kurumsal sosyal sorumlulukdüzeyleri ile toplam satışlar ve satış kârlılığı oranı arasında anlamlı bir ilişki tespit edilememiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARA, E., ACAR, D. E. (2022). Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk düzeyinin işletmelerinfinansal performansına etkisinin incelenmesi: Bıst kurumsal yönetim endeksi üzerine bir uygulama. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 23, 227–242. https://ajindex.com/articles/645454

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Alexander, G. J., & Rogene A. B. (1978). Corporate social performance and stock market performance. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 479–486. Arsoy Poroy, A., Arabacı Ö., & Çiftçioğlu, A. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and fnancial performance relationship: The case of Turkey. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 53, 159-176.
  2. Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfeld, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and proftability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446-463.
  3. Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder infuence capacity and the variability of fnancial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–81. Becchetti, L., Di Giacomo, S., & Pinnacchio, D. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and corporate performance: evidence from a panel of U.S. listed companies, Working paper, (CEIS). Bowman, E. H., & Haire, M. (1975). A strategic posture toward corporate social responsibility. California Manage. Review, 18(2), 49-58.
  4. Bradgon, J. H., & Marlin, J. (1972). Is pollution proftable? Risk Management, 19(4), 9-18.
  5. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-505.
  6. Clarkson, Max B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporatesocial performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92–117. Cochran, P. L., & Wood, R. A. (1984). Corporate social responsibility and fnancial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 42-56.
  7. Crowther, D., & Rayman-Bacchus, L. (eds.). (2004). Perspectives in corporate social responsibility. Ashgate,Burlington,USA. Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review, 2, 70-76.
  8. Davis, K., & Blomstrom, R. L. (1966). Business and its environment. New York: McGraw- Hill. Davis, K. (1967). Understanding the social responsibility puzzle: What does the businessman owe to society? Business Horizons, 10, 45-50.
  9. Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy ofManagement Journal, 16, 312-322.
  10. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfeld, MA: Pitman. Flammer, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 758–781. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its