Journals / Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

The Effects of Spillover of Negative Emotion In Family-Job Roles And Examination of The Moderator Role of The Importance of Job: A Research on Academicians

Aile - İş Rollerinde Negatif Duygu Yayılmasının Etkileri Ve İşin Öneminin Düzenleyici Rolünün İncelenmesi: Akademisyenler Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Pages
175–193
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This finding shows that negative spillover, which is assumed in the depletion approach and spillover theory, will not always be valid, and that this negative spillover may change depending on the importance given to roles.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The sample of the study, which aims to examine the relationships between family negative emotions, work attention, and the importance of work, consists of 388 academic staff.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Regression analyzes were applied to test the hypotheses developed within the conceptual framework of the research.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This finding shows that negative spillover, which is assumed in the depletion approach and spillover theory, will not always be valid, and that this negative spillover may change depending on the importance given to roles.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:iş aile rolleri · negatif duygular · işin önemi

Abstract

The sample of the study, which aims to examine the relationships between family negative emotions, work attention, and the importance of work, consists of 388 academic staff. Regression analyzes were applied to test the hypotheses developed within the conceptual framework of the research. It has been found that negative emotions from the family have a negative effect on attention to work and the importance of work has a moderating role in this relationship. This finding shows that negative spillover, which is assumed in the depletion approach and spillover theory, will not always be valid, and that this negative spillover may change depending on the importance given to roles.

Özet

Çalışanların aileden gelen negatif duyguları, iş dikkati ve işin önemi arasındaki ilişkileri incelemeyi amaçlayan bu çalışmanın örneklemi, 388 akademik personelden oluşmaktadır. Araştırmanın kavramsal çerçevesi kapsamında geliştirilen hipotezlerin test edilmesi için uygulanan analiz sonuçlarına göre aileden gelen negatif duyguların işe dikkat üzerinde negatif yönlü bir etkiye sahip olduğu ve bu ilişkide işin öneminin düzenleyici (moderator) rolü olduğu ortaya konulmuştur. Bu bulgu tükenme yaklaşımında ve yayılma teorisinde varsayılan negatif yayılmanın her zaman geçerli olmayacağını ve rollere verilen önem düzeyine göre bu negatif yayılmanın değişebileceğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

WOLFF, R. A., DEMİR, G. (2022). The Effects of Spillover of Negative Emotion In Family-Job Roles And Examination of The Moderator Role of The Importance of Job: A Research on Academicians. Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 175–193. https://ajindex.com/articles/644707

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. AİKEN, L. S. ve WEST, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. ALBAYRAK, A. S. (2005) “Çoklu Doğrusal Bağlantı Halinde Enküçük Kareler Tekniğinin Alternatifi Yanlı Tahmin Teknikleri ve Bir Uygulama”, ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1 (1), 105-126.
  2. ALMAGOR, M., ve BEN-PORATH, Y. S. (1989). The Two-Factor Model Of Self-Reported Mood: A Cross-Cultural Replication. Journal Of Personality Assessment, 53(1), 10-21.
  3. BARON, R. M., KENNY, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1173 – 1182. BAŞ, T. (2008). Anket: Anket Nasıl Hazırlanır, Uygulanır, Değerlendirilir?, 5. Baskı, Ankara:
  4. Seçkin Yayınevi.
  5. BEEK, I., V., HU, Q., Schaufeli, W., B., Taris, Schreurs B. H. J. (2012).
  6. For Fun, Love, or Money: What Drives Workaholic, Engaged, and Burned-Out Employees at Work?. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 61 (1), 30–55.
  7. BRİEF, A. P., ve WEİSS, H. M. (2002). Organizational Behavior: Affect İn The Workplace. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 279-307.
  8. BOWLİNG, N., A., ESCHLEMAN, K. J., WANG Q., KIRKENDALL, C. ve Alarcon G. (2010). A Meta-Analysis Of The Predictors And Consequences Of Organization-Based Self-Esteem. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 601–626.
  9. BYRNE, B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modelling With Amos; Basic Concepts, Applications And Programming, New York: Taylor And Francis. CARLSON, D. S., KACMAR, K. M., WAYNE, J. H., ve GRZYWACZ, J. G. (2006). Measuring The Positive Side Of The Work–Family İnterface: Development And Validation Of A Work–Family Enrichment Scale. Journal Of Vocational Behavior, 68(1), 131-164.
  10. DE JONGE, J. ve DORMANN, C. (2003). The DISC Model: Demand-İnduced Strain Compensation Mechanisms İn Job Stress. Occupational Stress in the Service Professions, 91, 43-74.
  11. EDWARDS, J. R., ve ROTHBARD, N. P. (2000). Mechanisms Linking Work And Family: Clarifying The Relationship Between Work And Family Constructs. Academy Of Management Review, 25(1), 178-199.
  12. FRONE, M. R. (2003). Work-Family Balance. Handbook of Occupatonal Health Psychology, Washington, American Psychological Association, 143-162.
  13. GREENHAUS, J. H. ve POWELL, G. N. (2006). When Work And Family Are Allies: A Theory Of Work–Family Enrichment. The Academy of Management Review, 31 (1), 72–92.
  14. GRZYWACZ, J. G. ve MARKS, N. F. (2000)