SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 56

A Qualitative Study on the Investigation of Violence and Men who Inflict Violence from the Perspective of Men

Yunus AKAN
Binnaz KIRAN
Pages
37–79
Publication Date
2020-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The characteristics of men who implement violence are perceived by 68% as being “unable to control oneself, quick to anger, impatient.” The social reasons for violence are seen mostly as “financial problems” (79%), as “psychological reasons” (68%), as “women’s hurtful words, provocative behavior”, and as “cultural reasons” (49%): “It’s necessary to beat someone up out of a sense of decency.” The findings obtained from this research are discussed in the context of literature and some suggestions, such as raising awareness about the types and effects of violence.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this research is to reveal men’s attitudes towards violence and thoughts about men who use violence.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of the study consists of 19 men selected using purposeful sampling according to the maximum diversity method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The characteristics of men who implement violence are perceived by 68% as being “unable to control oneself, quick to anger, impatient.” The social reasons for violence are seen mostly as “financial problems” (79%), as “psychological reasons” (68%), as “women’s hurtful words, provocative behavior”, and as “cultural reasons” (49%): “It’s necessary to beat someone up out of a sense of decency.” The findings obtained from this research are discussed in the context of literature and some suggestions, such as raising awareness about the types and effects of violence.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Man Violence · Aggression · Violence Perception

Özet

The purpose of this research is to reveal men’s attitudes towards violence and thoughts about men who use violence. The sample of the study consists of 19 men selected using purposeful sampling according to the maximum diversity method. The data used in this research was obtained through an interview and a semi-structured interview form. Coding based content analysis was used to analyze the data. Some of the findings obtained from the research are: violence is perceived by 79% as more physical. The characteristics of men who implement violence are perceived by 68% as being “unable to control oneself, quick to anger, impatient.” The social reasons for violence are seen mostly as “financial problems” (79%), as “psychological reasons” (68%), as “women’s hurtful words, provocative behavior”, and as “cultural reasons” (49%): “It’s necessary to beat someone up out of a sense of decency.” The findings obtained from this research are discussed in the context of literature and some suggestions, such as raising awareness about the types and effects of violence.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKAN, Y., KIRAN, B. (2020). A Qualitative Study on the Investigation of Violence and Men who Inflict Violence from the Perspective of Men. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 56, 37–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/64364

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Akan, Y., & Kıran, B. (2019). “Şiddeti Azaltma Psikoeitim Programı”nın (ŞAPP) eşine şiddet uygulayan erkeklerin saldırganlık, duygu yönetimi ve ilişki özyeterlik düzeylerine etkisinin incelenmesi. Kadem Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 31-65.
  2. Akkuş, S., & Yıldırım, Ş., (2018). Erkeklerin kadına yönelik fiziksel şiddet uygulamasına etki eden faktörlerin incelenmesi. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 17(4), 1368- 1388 Altheide, D. L., & Johnson, J. M. (2011). Reflections on interpretive adequacy in qualitative research. In. N. K. Denzin ve Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (Forth Edition). (s. 581-594).
  3. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Altınay, A. G. & Arat, Y. (2007). Türkiye'de kadına yönelik şiddet. Ankara:
  4. Tübitak Yayınları.
  5. Altun, M. (2006). Denizli ili kırsalında bir sağlık ocağı bölgesinde 15-49 yaş evli kadınların, fiziksel şiddet görme durumları ve kadınların şiddete ilişkin tutumları. Doktora Tezi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi,
  6. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Denizli. Arendt, H. (2012). Şiddet üzerine (6b.) (Çev. B. Peker İstanbul:
  7. İletişim Yayınevi.
  8. Ayan, S. (2007). Aile içinde şiddete uğrayan çocukların saldırganlık eğilimleri. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 8(3), 206-214.
  9. Balcıoğlu, İ. (2001). Şiddet ve toplum. Ankara:
  10. Bilge Yayınları.
  11. Bandura A. (1997). Social learning theory. New Jersey: Practice Hall Barutçu, A. (2013). Türkiye'de erkeklik inşasının bedensel ve toplumsal aşamaları. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi,
  12. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  13. Baykal, T. (2008). Ailede kadına yönelik fiziksel şiddet, bu şiddete ilişkin tutumlar ve kişinin şiddet yaşantısı. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi,
  14. İzmir.
  15. Chapple, C. L., & Johnson, K. A. (2007). Gender differences ın ımpulsivity. Youth Violence And Juvenile Justice, 5(3), 221-234.
  16. Çelik, G. (2013). Eşine şiddet uygulayan erkeklere yönelik grup çalışması: Bilişsel-davranışçı yaklaşımla yapılandırılan grup sürecine bakış. Aile ve Kadın Sempozyumu, 51. Çivi, S., Kutlu, R., & Marakoğlu, K. (2008). The Frequency of violence against women and the factors affecting this: A study on women who applied to two primary health care centers. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, 50, 110-116.
  17. Delice, M. (2013) Polis kayıtlarına yansımış kadına şiddet olaylarının incelenmesi: Erzurum Örneği, Polis Akademisi Yayınları, 13-40
  18. Deutsch, M. (2000). A framework for thinking about research on conflict resolution training. the handbook of conflict resolution: theory and practice.