SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 16 Issue: 82

Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Stressful Life Events Scale and Its Relative Importance in Predicting Trauma Symptoms

Fatmanur Çimen(ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6068-430X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall models explained 10.6% of the variance in PTSD symptoms and 12.1% of the variance in CPTSD symptoms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of a measure assessing stressful life events among school students in the Turkish cultural context and to investigate the relative importance of different domains of stressful life experiences in explaining symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex posttraumatic stress disorder (CPTSD).
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 400 school students attending various schools participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall models explained 10.6% of the variance in PTSD symptoms and 12.1% of the variance in CPTSD symptoms.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Stressful life events · posttraumatic stress symptoms · complex posttraumatic stress disorder

Abstract

The present study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of a measure assessing stressful life events among school students in the Turkish cultural context and to investigate the relative importance of different domains of stressful life experiences in explaining symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex posttraumatic stress disorder (CPTSD). A total of 400 school students attending various schools participated in the study. Construct validity was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis, while reliability was assessed through Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega coefficients. The relative contributions of the psychosocial stress domains to PTSD and CPTSD symptoms were examined using relative importance analysis. The findings demonstrated that the scale is a valid and reliable instrument for use in the Turkish cultural context. In addition, significant associations were found between psychosocial stress and both PTSD and CPTSD symptoms. The overall models explained 10.6% of the variance in PTSD symptoms and 12.1% of the variance in CPTSD symptoms. The Lindeman, Merenda, and Gold (LMG) decomposition indicated that Life Adaptation and Academic Adaptation made the two largest contributions to the explained variance in both outcomes. Although Life Adaptation had the largest numerical LMG contribution, its contribution did not differ significantly from that of Academic Adaptation. These findings suggest that stressful experiences involving life and academic adaptation may be particularly relevant to trauma-related symptoms among school students. Because the findings are based on cross-sectional associations and the partitioning of explained variance among correlated predictors, they should not be interpreted as evidence of causal effects or of the unique superiority of one stress domain. The results highlight the potential value of preventive and intervention-based child mental health efforts that consider difficulties across multiple adaptation domains.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çimen, F., *, F. Ç. (2026). Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Stressful Life Events Scale and Its Relative Importance in Predicting Trauma Symptoms. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, Volume: 16 Issue: 82. https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1974168

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (39)

  1. Behrendt, M., Vervliet, M., Rota, M., Adeyinka, S., Uzureau, O., Rasmussen, A., Glaesmer, H., Lietaert, I., & Derluyn, I. (2023). A conceptual study on the relationship between daily stressors, stressful life events, and mental health in refugees using network analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1134667. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1134667
  2. Boeke, E. A., Moscarello, J. M., LeDoux, J. E., Phelps, E. A., & Hartley, C. A. (2017). Active avoidance: Neural mechanisms and attenuation of Pavlovian conditioned responding. The Journal of Neuroscience, 37(18), 4808–4818. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3261-16.2017
  3. Buechel, C., Nehring, I., Seifert, C., Eber, S., Behrends, U., Mall, V., & Friedmann, A. (2022). A cross-sectional investigation of psychosocial stress factors in German families with children aged 0–3 years during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial results of the CoronabaBY study. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 16(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-022-00464-z
  4. Çimen, F., & Seçer, İ. (2025). The psychometric properties of the International Trauma Questionnaire–Child and Adolescent version in Turkish culture. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 16(1), 2590402. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2590402
  5. Cloitre, M., (2021). Complex PTSD: Assessment and treatment, European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 12, 1866423. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1866423
  6. Cloitre, M., Shevlin, M., Brewin, C. R., Bisson, J. I., Roberts, N. P., Maercker, A., Karatzias, T., & Hyland, P. (2018). The International Trauma Questionnaire: Development of a self-report measure of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 138(6), 536–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12956
  7. Cohodes, E. M., Sisk, L. M., Keding, T. J., Mandell, J. D., Notti, M. E., & Gee, D. G. (2023). Characterizing experiential elements of early-life stress to inform resilience: Buffering effects of controllability and predictability and the importance of their timing. Development and Psychopathology, 35(5), 2288-2301. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579423000822
  8. Collier, J. E. (2020). Applied structural equation modeling using AMOS: Basic to advanced techniques. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003018414
  9. Compas, B. E., Connor-Smith, J. K., Saltzman, H., Thomsen, A. H., & Wadsworth, M. E. (2001). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: Problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 87–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.87
  10. Cortese, S., Arango, C., Aymerich, C., Catalan, A., Chetouani, M., Cohen, D.,. & Fusar‐Poli, P. (2026). Child and adolescent psychiatry: Challenges, solutions, opportunities, and future directions. World Psychiatry, 25(2), 190-224. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.70044
  11. Dancey, C. P., & Reidy, J. (2011). Statistics without maths for psychology (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.
  12. Davis, S.L., & Soistmann, H.C. (2022) Child’s perceived stress: A concept analysis. J Pediatr Nurs., 67, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2022.07.013
  13. De Schryver, M., Vindevogel, S., Rasmussen, A. E., & Cramer, A. O. (2015). Unpacking constructs: A network approach for studying war exposure, daily stressors and post-traumatic stress disorder. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1896. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01896
  14. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  15. González-Acosta, C. A., Rojas-Cerón, C. A., & Buriticá, E. (2021). Functional alterations and cerebral variations in humans exposed to early life stress. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 536188. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.536188
  16. Hanke, M., Looser, V. N., Bruggisser, F., Leuenberger, R., Gerber, M., & Ludyga, S. (2023). Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and reactivity to acute psychosocial stress in preadolescent children. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 26(9), 487-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2023.07.010
  17. Hou, W. K., Hall, B. J., & Hobfoll, S. E. (2018). Drive to thrive: A theory of resilience following loss. In N. Morina & A. Nickerson (Eds.), Mental health of refugee and conflict-affected populations (pp. 111–133). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97046-2_6
  18. Hyland, P., Shevlin, M., & Brewin, C. R. (2023). The memory and identity theory of ICD-11 complex posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological Review, 130(4), 1044-1065. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000418
  19. Janšáková, K., Belica, I., Rajčániová, E., Rajčáni, J., Kyselicová, K., Celušáková, H.,. & Ostatníková, D. (2021). The acute effect of psychosocial stress on the level of oxidative stress in children. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 161, 86-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.01.007
  20. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
  21. LeMoult, J., Humphreys, K. L., Tracy, A., Hoffmeister, J. A., Ip, E., & Gotlib, I. H. (2020). Meta-analysis: exposure to early life stress and risk for depression in childhood and adolescence. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 59(7), 842-855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2019.10.011
  22. Liang, L., Bonanno, G. A., Hougen, C., Hobfoll, S. E., & Hou, W. K. (2023). Everyday life experiences for evaluating post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 14(2), 2238584. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2023.2238584
  23. Ligneul, R., Mainen, Z. F., Ly, V., & Cools, R. (2022). Stress-sensitive inference of task controllability. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(6), 812–822. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01306-w
  24. Liu, S., Zhou, Y., Wu, D., Tian, Y., Luo, J., Zhang, J.,. & Liu, Q. (2025). Psychosocial Stress trajectories are associated with puberty timing: Findings from a 7-year cohort in chongqing, China. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 110(4), e945-e952. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae378
  25. Lupien, S. J., McEwen, B. S., Gunnar, M. R., & Heim, C. (2009). Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(6), 434-445. https://www.nature.com/articles/nrn2639
  26. McLaughlin, K. A., DeCross, S. N., Jovanovic, T., & Tottenham, N. (2019). Mechanisms linking childhood adversity with psychopathology: Learning as an intervention target. Behaviour research and therapy, 118, 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2019.04.008
  27. Miller, K., E., & Rasmussen, A. (2017). The mental health of civilians displaced by armed conflict: an ecological model of refugee distress. Epidemiol. Psychiatr. Sci.26, 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796016000172
  28. Mousikou, M., Kyriakou, A., & Skordis, N. (2023). Stress and growth in children and adolescents. Hormone research in paediatrics, 96(1), 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1159/000521074
  29. Oar, E. L., Johnco, C., & Ollendick, T. H. (2017). Cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents. Psychiatric Clinics, 40(4), 661-674. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd013162.pub2
  30. Ponnamperuma, T., & Nicolson, N. A. (2018). The relative impact of traumatic experiences and daily stressors on mental health outcomes in Sri Lankan adolescents. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 31(4), 487-498. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22311
  31. Ramirez, F., Moscarello, J. M., LeDoux, J. E., & Sears, R. M. (2015). Active avoidance requires a serial basal amygdala to nucleus accumbens shell circuit. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(8), 3470–3477. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1331-14.2015
  32. Reichert, M., Brüßler, S., Reinhard, I., Braun, U., Giurgiu, M., Hoell, A.,. & Ebner-Priemer, U. W. (2022). The association of stress and physical activity: Mind the ecological fallacy. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, 52(2), 282-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-022-00823-0
  33. Schroeder, A., Notaras, M., Du, X., & Hill, R. A. (2018). On the developmental timing of stress: Delineating sex-specific effects of stress across development on adult behavior. Brain sciences, 8(7), 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8070121
  34. Sheridan, M. A., & Zeanah, C. H. (2019). Dimensions of adversity exposure and psychopathology: Deprivation and threat. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 58(10), S339-S340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2019.07.807
  35. Smith, K. E., & Pollak, S. D. (2022). Early life stress and neural development: Implications for understanding the developmental effects of COVID-19. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 22(4), 643-654. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-021-00901-0
  36. Solmi, M., Radua, J., Olivola, M., Croce, E., Soardo, L., Salazar de Pablo, G.,. & Fusar-Poli, P. (2022). Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: large-scale meta-analysis of 192 epidemiological studies. Molecular psychiatry, 27(1), 281-295. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01161-7
  37. Tao, T. J., Yung, Y. Y. Y., Lau, A. Y. T., Liu, H., Liang, L., Bryant, F. B., & Hou, W. K. (2023). Savoring mediates the mental health benefits of positive coping processes: A prospective population-based analysis. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 16(1), 158-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12476
  38. Zhang, J., Feng, X., Wang, W., Luo, J., Huang, T., Chen, Z.,. & Liu, Q. (2026). The association between psychosocial stress trajectories and emotional and behavioral problems in children and adolescents. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 35(1), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-025-02812-8
  39. Zisopoulou, T., & Varvogli, L. (2023). Stress management methods in children and adolescents: Past, present, and future. Hormone Research in Paediatrics, 96(1), 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1159/000526946