SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Üstün Zeka ve Eğitim Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

The Effectiveness of Self-Regulated Learning on Teaching SCAMPER Technique of Creativity

SCAMPER Yaratıcılık Tekniğinin Öğretiminde Öz Düzenleyici Öğrenmenin Etkililiği

Melodi ÖZYAPRAK
Marilena Z. LEANA TAŞÇILAR
Pages
16–31
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings of the study revealed that self-regulated learningwas effective to teach SCAMPER

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Researchers of current study hypothesized that selfregulated learning is a convenient tool to enhance creativity since both serve to autonomous learning andself-actualization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 14 participants were assigned to receive the experimental training.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings of the study revealed that self-regulated learningwas effective to teach SCAMPER
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Researchers of current study hypothesized that selfregulated learning is a convenient tool to enhance creativity since both serve to autonomous learning andself-actualization. In this respect, the aim of the studywas to investigate the effect of self-regulated learningon enhancing creative thinking skills. An experimental design with a control group was used in thisstudy. A total of 14 participants were assigned to receive the experimental training. The same number ofparticipants was assigned to the control group. Aunique program developed by the researchers combined SCAMPER and self-regulated learning technique was used in the experimental group. OnlySCAMPER was used in the control group. The findings of the study revealed that self-regulated learningwas effective to teach SCAMPER

Özet

Mevcut araştırmada öz düzenleyici öğrenmenin, otonom bir düşünür olup kendini gerçekleştirmeye hizmet etmesinden dolayı, yaratıcılığın arttırılması için uygun bir araç olduğu varsayılmaktadır. Bu bağlamda çalışmanın amacı, öz düzenleyici öğrenmenin yaratıcı düşünme becerilerini geliştirmedeki etkisini araştırmaktır ve temel araştırma sorusu şu şekildedir: Öz düzenleyici öğrenme, üniversite 2. Sınıf öğrencilerinin SCAMPER etkinliğindeki puanlarının arttırılmasında etkili midir? Bu çalışmada kontrol gruplu deneysel model kullanılmıştır. Deney ve kontrol grupları on dört öğrenciden oluşmuştur. Mevcut çalışma kapsamında araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen ve SCAMPER ve öz düzenleyici öğrenme teknikleri birleştiren bir program deney grubuna uygulanmıştır. Kontrol grubunda sadece SCAMPER tekniği çalışılmıştır. Çalışmanın bulguları, öz düzenleyici öğrenmenin, SCAMPER tekniğinin öğretilmesi için etkili olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZYAPRAK, M., TAŞÇILAR, M. Z. L. (2022). The Effectiveness of Self-Regulated Learning on Teaching SCAMPER Technique of Creativity. Türk Üstün Zeka ve Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 16–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/643336

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
  2. Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and divergent thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Clifss, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Barak, M., & Mesika, P. (2007). Teaching methods for inventive problem-solving in junior high school. Thinking skills and creativity, 2(1), 19-29.
  3. Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2001). The tool of the mind: A case study of implementing the Vygotskian approach in American early childhood and primary classrooms. Geneva, Switzerland: UNESCO International Bureau of Education. Craft, A. (2000). Creativity across the primary curriculum: framing and developing practice. London: Routledge. Dacey, J. S. (1989). Fundamentals of creative thinking. Toronto: Lexington Books. Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Press.
  4. Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D. (2011). Education of the gifted and talented (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Press.
  5. De Bono, E. (1992). Serious creativity. New York: Harper Collins. De Bono, E. (2000). New thinking for the new millennium. Beverly Hills, California: New Millennium Press.
  6. DeHaan, R. L. (2005). The impending revolution in undergraduate science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, 253–270.
  7. Diamond, A., Barnett, W. S., Thomas, J., & Munro, S. (2007). Preschool program improves cognitive control. Science, 318, 1387– 1388. Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4-58.
  8. Felder, R. (1988). Creativity in engineering education. Chemical Engineering Education, 22(3), 120- 125. Feldman, D. H., & Benjamin, A. C. (2006). Creativity and education: An american retrospective. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36, 319–336.
  9. Feldhusen, J. F. ve Eng Goh, B. (1995). Assessing and accessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research, and development. Creativity Research Journal, 8(3), 231–244.
  10. Feldhusen, J. F., & Treffinger, D. J. (1977). The role of instructional material in teaching creative thinking. Gifted Child Quarterly, 21(4), 450-459.
  11. Freiman, V. (2009). Mathematic