SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Ortodonti Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of wits appraisal with ANB angle

Wits ölçümünün ANB açısıyla karşılaştırılması

Mehmet Birol ÖZEL
F. Erhan ÖZDİLER
Pages
294–308
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After subtraction of z scores of the combinations; four groups were established according to the differences between them. (-°°

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study Was to compare Wits Appraisal with ANB measurements which are used to evaluate maxillomandibular sagittal relationships. 54 measurements have been made on 203 lateral cephalograms of untreated adults and z scores of ANB and Wits measurements have been calculated in order to make them comparable.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study Was to compare Wits Appraisal with ANB measurements which are used to evaluate maxillomandibular sagittal relationships. 54 measurements have been made on 203 lateral cephalograms of untreated adults and z scores of ANB and Wits measurements have been calculated in order to make them comparable.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After subtraction of z scores of the combinations; four groups were established according to the differences between them. (-°°
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study Was to compare Wits Appraisal with ANB measurements which are used to evaluate maxillomandibular sagittal relationships. 54 measurements have been made on 203 lateral cephalograms of untreated adults and z scores of ANB and Wits measurements have been calculated in order to make them comparable. After subtraction of z scores of the combinations; four groups were established according to the differences between them. (-°°

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı maksillomandibuler ilişkinin belirlenmesinde kullanılan Wits Ölçümü ve ANB açılarının karşılaştırılmasıdır. Bu amaçla 203 erişkin bireye ait teşhis lateral sefalogramı üzerinde 54 adet ölçüm yapılmış; Wits Ölçümü ve ANB açıları için standardize değerler (Z skorları) hesaplanarak bu ölçümler karşılaştırılabilir hale getirilmiştir. Oluşturulan kombinasyonlardaki ölçümlerin z skorlarının farkları alınmış ve alınan farklar aynı formül kullanılarak tekrar standardize edilmiş ve (-°°

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZEL, M. B., ÖZDİLER, F. E. (2022). Comparison of wits appraisal with ANB angle. Türk Ortodonti Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 294–308. https://ajindex.com/articles/639539

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. Chaconas SJ, Fragiskos FD. Orthognathic diagnosis and treatment planning: a cephalometric approach. J. Oral Rehabil., 18(6):531-45, 1991
  2. Athanasiou AE. Orthodontic Cephalometry. Mosby Wolfe Company, London, 1997
  3. Uzel İ, Enacar A. Ortodontide Sefalometri. Adana: Çukurova Üniversitesi Basımevi, 2000
  4. Tweed CH. The Frankfort mandibular plane angle in ortho- dontic diagnosis, classification, treatment planning, and prog- nosis. Am. J. Orthod. Oral Surg., 32:175-230, 1946
  5. Margolis Hi. A basic facial pattern and its application in clin- ical orthodontics. II. Craniofacial skeletal analysis and den- tocraniofacial orientation. Am. J. Orthod., 39:425-43, 1953
  6. Wylie WL. The assessment of anteroposterior dysplasia. Angle Orthod., 17:97-109, 1947
  7. Downs WB. Variation in facial relationships: their signifi- cance in treatment and prognosis. Am. J. Orthod., 34:812-40, 1948
  8. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am. J. Orthod., 39:729-736, 1953
  9. Sassouni V. Roentgenographic cephalometric analysis of cephalo-facial-dental relationships. Am. J. Orthod., 41:735-64, 1955
  10. Ricketts RM. A foundation for cephalometric communica- tion. Am. J. Orthod., 46:330-57, 1960
  11. Jarabak JR, Fizzel JÂ. Technique and treatment with lightwire edgewise appliances, ed. 2, St. Louis,, The C. V. Mosby Company, 1972
  12. Riedel RA. The relation of the maxillary structures to the cranium in malocclusion and normal occlusion. Angle Orthod., 22:142-5, 1952
  13. Jacobson A. The "Wits" appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am. J. Orthod., 67: 125-138, 1975
  14. Burstone CJ, James RB, Legan HL, Murphy GA, Norton LA. Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery. J. Oral. Surg. 36:269-77, 1978
  15. Mcnamara JA. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am. J. Orthod., 86:449-69, 1984
  16. Hussels W, Nanda RS. Analysis of the factors affecting angle ANB. Am. J. Orthod., 85:411-23, 1984
  17. Hussels W, Nanda RS. Clinical application of a method to correct angle ANB for geometric effects. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 92:506-10, 1987
  18. Gazilerli Ü, Ceylan İ. ANB Açısını Etkileyen Etkenlerin İncelenmesi. Türk Ortodonti Dergisi, 8(2):182-186,1995
  19. Oktay H. A comparison of ANB, WITS, AF-BF, and APDI measurements. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 99:122-8, 1991
  20. Güray E, Orhan M, Doruk EC. Ortodontide Geometri: Björk Poligonundaki Posterior Açılar Toplamının Geometrik Olarak Değerlendirilmesi (Teorik Çalışma). Türk Ortodonti Dergisi, 7(1 ):17-21, 1994
  21. Özel MB