Journals / Türk Ortodonti Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of fit between tooth and band surfaces when different orthodontic cements are used

Farklı ortodontik simanlar kullanıldığında diş ve bant yüzeyleri arasındaki uyumun değerlendirilmesi

Pages
188–197
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Statistically analyses Were perfor-medby using analysis of variance and paired-samples HeSt When buccal and lingual gap formations were compared Transbond Plus® and Ketac Certi® groups Were found to have larger gaps in the lingual şife than buccal at p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this in vitro study was to compare three orthodontic band cements for gaps remained between tooth and band surfaces, at the cervical margin, which possibly caused after banding procedure.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Sixty freshly extracted human mandibular third molars were randomly divided into 3 equal groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Statistically analyses Were perfor-medby using analysis of variance and paired-samples HeSt When buccal and lingual gap formations were compared Transbond Plus® and Ketac Certi® groups Were found to have larger gaps in the lingual şife than buccal at p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro study was to compare three orthodontic band cements for gaps remained between tooth and band surfaces, at the cervical margin, which possibly caused after banding procedure. Sixty freshly extracted human mandibular third molars were randomly divided into 3 equal groups. Micro-etched molar bands were cemented to the teeth using each of the orthodontic band cements (Ketac Cem®;, 3M Mutti~Cure® and transbond Plus®). The teeth were placed in preformed boxes (2.5X2.5X2.5 cm): crowns were on the bottom and perpendicular to the ground. Samples were capped with black colored plaster on a vibration machine. After hardening of the piasters, samples were removed from the boxes and were trimmed in thehucco-lingual dimension for evaluation i The mean, of four parallel sections examined under a stere-omicroscope was noted as the score of that sample>, for buccal and lingual sides, separately. Statistically analyses Were perfor-medby using analysis of variance and paired-samples HeSt When buccal and lingual gap formations were compared Transbond Plus® and Ketac Certi® groups Were found to have larger gaps in the lingual şife than buccal at p

Özet

Bu iri vitro çalışmanın amacı, dişlerin ha ntl an masından sonra, diş ve bant yüzeyleri arasında servikâl martinde kalan boşlukların, farklı bant simanlan için değerlendirilmesidir. Altmış alt üçüncü molar diş rastgele üç gruba, ayrı İd f. İçleri pürüzlehdiriIMş molar bantları farklı ortodontik bant simanlan kullanılarak dişlere simante edildi (Ketac Cem®, 3 M Multi-Cure® ve Transbond Plus®). Dişi er, kronları yere dik olacak şekilde önceden hazırlanmış kutulara (2:5 X 2,5 X 2,5 cm) yerleştirirdi. Örnekler bir vibrasyon makinesi üzerinde siyah alçı ile kaplandı. Alçı sertleştikten sonra örnekler kutulardan çıkarıldı. Skoıiama için bukkolingual yönde trimlendi. Stereom i kroskop altında incelenen dört paralel kesitin ortalaması o örneğin skoru olarak bukkal ve lingual yüzeyler için ayrı ayn kaydedildi. Veriler, varyans ve eşleştirilmiş Westi vie istatistiksel olarak değerlendirildi. Bukkal ve lingualdeki boşluklar karşılaştırıldığında, Ketac Cem® (p

🔖

Cite This Article

EKİZER, A., UYSAL, T., ERTAŞ, H., RAMOĞLU, S. İ. (2022). Evaluation of fit between tooth and band surfaces when different orthodontic cements are used. Türk Ortodonti Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 188–197. https://ajindex.com/articles/639479

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Zachrisson S, Zachrisson BU. Gingival condition associated with orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 1972;42:26-34
  2. Van der Linden RF? Dermaut LR. White spot formation under orthodontic bands cemented with glass ionomer with or without Fluor Protector. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:219-224
  3. Mizrahi E. Enamel demineralization following orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:62-67
  4. Mizrahi E. Surface distribution of. enamel opacities following orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1983;84:323-331
  5. Türkkahraman H, Sayin MO, Bozkurt FY, Yetkin Z, Kaya S, Onal S. Archwire ligation techniques, microbial colonization, and periodontal status in orthodontically treated patients. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:231-236
  6. Ogaard B, Rolla G, Arends J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;94:68-73
  7. Ogaard B, Rolla G, Arends J, ten Cate JM. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 2. Prevention and treatment of lesions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;94:123-128
  8. Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod. 1982;81:93-98
  9. Ogaard B. Prevalence of white spot lesions in 19-year-olds: a study on untreated and orthodontically treated persons 5 years after treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;96:423-427
  10. Mizrahi E. Success and failure of banding and bonding. A clinical study. Angle Orthod. 1982;52:113-117
  11. Fricker JP A 12-month clinical comparison of resin-modified light-activated adhesives for the cementation of orthodontic molar bands. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:239-243
  12. Donly KJ, Istre S, Istre T. In vitro enamel remineralization at orthodontic band margins cemented with glass ionomer cement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;107:461-464
  13. James JW, Miller BH, English JD, Tadlock LF? Buschang PH. Effects of high speed curing devices on shear bond strength and microleakage of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:555-561
  14. Adriaens ML, Dermaut LR, Verbeeck RM. The use of 'Fluor Protector', a fluoride varnish, as a caries prevention method under orthodontic molar bands. Eur J Orthod. 1990;12:316-319
  15. Wisth J. The ability of zinc phosphate and hydro phosphate cements to seal band spaces. Angle Orthod. 1972;42:395-398: 16. Paschos E, Limbach M, Teichmann M, Huth KC, Folwaczny M, Hickel R, Rudzki-Janson I. Orthodontic attachments