The comparison of our LASIK and LASEK results in low myopia

Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose : To compare the visual and refractive results. contrast sensitivity and tear stability after LASIK and LASEK in low myopia.Methods : In Beyoglu Eye Education and Research Hospital. patients diagnosed with low myopia and with a maximum difference of 1 diopter between the refraction values of the two eyes received LASEK treatment on one of their eyes and LASIK on the other eye. randomly.

📊

Key Findings & Data:Total of 70 eyes from 35 patients were included in the study.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:Wilcoxon test has been used in statistical comparisons and a value of p

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample

⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose : To compare the visual and refractive results. contrast sensitivity and tear stability after LASIK and LASEK in low myopia.Methods : In Beyoglu Eye Education and Research Hospital. patients diagnosed with low myopia and with a maximum difference of 1 diopter between the refraction values of the two eyes received LASEK treatment on one of their eyes and LASIK on the other eye. randomly. Total of 70 eyes from 35 patients were included in the study. The follow-up period was 9-15 months and the mean age was 25.71±6.02 (19-36). Uncorrected (UCVA) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Schirmer test results. tear break-up time (BUT). corneal asphericity (Q). corneal uniformity index (CU). predicted corneal acuity (PCA) and contrast sensitivity values were compared with those of the preoperative period. Wilcoxon test has been used in statistical comparisons and a value of p

Özet

Amaç : Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) ve laser epitelyal keratomileusis (LASEK) yöntemlerini düşük miyopi grubunda görsel sonuçlar. kontrast duyarlılık ve göz yaşı stabilitesi açısından karşılaştırmak.Yöntem : Beyoğlu Göz Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Göz Kliniği Refraksiyon Birimi´nde düşük miyopi tanısı konmuş 16 kadın. 19 erkek 35 hastanın 70 gözü çalışma kapsamına alındı. Çalışmaya dahil edilen hastaların her iki gözdeki refraksiyon değerleri arasında en fazla 1 dioptri fark mevcuttu ve rastgele bir gözüne LASEK. diğer gözüne LASIK tedavisi uygulandı. Hastaların yaş ortalamaları 25.71±6.02 (19-36) ve takip süresi 9-15 ay (12 ay) idi. Cerrahi sonrası düzeltilmemiş. düzeltilmiş en iyi görme keskinliği. Schirmer testi sonuçları. gözyaşı kırılma zamanı. kornea asferisitesi. kornea düzenlilik indeksi. öngörülen kornea görme keskinliği değerleri ve kontrast duyarlılık değerleri preoperatif değerler ile karşılaştırıldı. İstatistiksel karşılaştırmalarda wilcoxon testi kullanıldı ve p

🔖

Cite This Article

İNAL, A., SİVRİKAYA, H., ALKIN, Z. T., PINARCI, E. Y., KAYA, V., YILMAZ, Ö. F. (2022). The comparison of our LASIK and LASEK results in low myopia. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 6, 463–469. https://ajindex.com/articles/638776

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

Trokel SL, Srinivasan R, Braren B: Excimer laser surgery of the cornea. Am J Ophthalmol 1983;96:710-715 2. Alio JL, Artola A, Claramonte PJ, Ayala MJ, Sanchez SP: Complications of photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: two year follow-up of 3000 cases. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998;24:619-626 3. Wang Z, Chen J, Yang B: Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy to correct myopia from -1.25 to -6.00 diopters. J Refract Surg 1997;13:528-534 4. Jacobs JM, Taravella MJ: Incidence of intraoperative flap complications in laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(l):23-8 5. Walker MB,Wilson SE: Incidence and prevention of epithelial growth within the interface after laser in situ keratomileusis. Cornea 2000;19:170-173 6. Melki SA,Talamo JH, Demetriades AM, Jabbur NS, Essepian JP, O'Brien TP, Azar DT: Late traumatic dislocation of laser in situ keratomileusis corneal flaps. Ophthalmology 2000;107:2136-2139 7. Smith RJ, Maloney RK: Diffuse lameller keratitis;a new syndrome in lameller refractive surgery. Ophthalmology 1998;105:1721-1726 8. Wang Z, Chen J, Yang B: Posterior corneal surface topographic changes after laser in situ keratomileusis are related to residual corneal bed thickness. Ophthalmolgy 1999;106:406-409 9. Arevalo JF, Ramirez E, Suarez E, Antzoulatos G, Morales-Stopello J, Ramirez G, Torres F, Gonzales-Vivas R: Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in myopic eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001:27:674-680 10. Camellin M: LASEK may offer the advantages of both LASIK and PRK. Ocular Surgery News. Internatinal Edi¬tion, March 1999 11. Braunstein RE, Jain S, McCally RL, Stark WJ, Connoly PJ, Azar DT: Objective measurement of corneal light scattering after excimer laser keratectomy. Ophthalmology 1996;103:439-43. 12. Claringbold TV 2nd. Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the correction of myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:18-22 13. Lee JB, Seong GJ, Lee JH, Seo KY, Lee YG, Kim EK: Comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for low to moderate myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Apr;27(4):565-70) 14. El Danasoury MA, El Maghraby A, Klyce SD, Mehrez K: Comparison of photorefractive keratectomy with eximer laser in situ keratomileusis in correcting low myopia (from-2.00 to -5.50 diopters); a randomized study. Ophthalmolgy. 1999;106:411-420; 15. Sugar A, Rapuano CJ, Culbertson WW, Huang D, Varley GA, Agapitos PJ, de Luise V