Journals / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 5

Comparison of IOP changes after phacoemulsification in eyes with and without pseudoexfoliation

Pseudoeksfolyasyonu olan ve olmayan olguların fakoemülsifikasyon sonrası göziçi basınç değişimlerinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
389–394
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The differences were not significant in each period for each group (p>0. 05).Conclusion : Phacoemulsification and IOL implantation had not significant effect on lOPs cases with normal preop IOP with PEX and without PEX.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose : To examine the effects of phacoemulsification with clear corneal incision on intraocular pressure (IOP) in patient with and without pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEXS).Methods : IOP changes in 39 eyes with PEX and cataract and in 40 eyes with cataract without PEX prospectively evaluated after phacoemulsification.
📊
Key Findings & Data:IOPs were measured preoperatively (preop) and 1 day. 1 week. 1 month. 3 months postoperatively (postop).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The differences were not significant in each period for each group (p>0. 05).Conclusion : Phacoemulsification and IOL implantation had not significant effect on lOPs cases with normal preop IOP with PEX and without PEX.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose : To examine the effects of phacoemulsification with clear corneal incision on intraocular pressure (IOP) in patient with and without pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEXS).Methods : IOP changes in 39 eyes with PEX and cataract and in 40 eyes with cataract without PEX prospectively evaluated after phacoemulsification. IOPs were measured preoperatively (preop) and 1 day. 1 week. 1 month. 3 months postoperatively (postop). IOP changes (∆IOP) during the follow up period were calculated as IOP in former minus later examinations (+) values indicates IOP increasement.Results : The mean IOPs were 14.9±3.7 mmHg in eyes with PEX and 14.67±3.2 mmHg without PEX. That was not statistically significant. The mean IOPs were 14.3±5.5 mmHg and 16.2±5.9 mmHg in first postop day. 14.3±4.9 mmHg and 15.1 ±5.11 mmHg in first week. 13.5±3 mmHg and 15.7±5 mmHg first month and 13.5±3.4 mmHg and 14.4±3.6 mmHg 3rd month postoperatively in eyes with PEX and without PEX respectively. The mean IOP changes between preop and postop first day were 0.5 and -1.5 mmHg. between first day and first week were 2.5 and 1.05 mmHg. between first week and first month were 0.7 and -0.5 mmHg. first month and third month were 0.4 and 1.2 mmHg in eyes with and without PEX respectively. The differences were not significant in each period for each group (p>0. 05).Conclusion : Phacoemulsification and IOL implantation had not significant effect on lOPs cases with normal preop IOP with PEX and without PEX.

Özet

Amaç: Pseudoeksfolyasyonu olan ve olmayan olgularda korneal kesili fakoemülsifikasyon cerrahisinin göziçi basıncı´na etkisini incelemek. Materyal-Metod: Katarakt ve pseudoeksfolyasyonu (PEX) olan 39 gözle. PEX´i olmayan kataraktlı 40 gözün fakoemülsifikasyon sonrası GİB´ları prospektif olarak incelendi. GİB´lar ameliyat öncesi ve ameliyat sonrası l.gün. l.hafta. l.ay ve 3.ayda ölçüldü. Bir önceki GİB ölçüm değerinden bir sonraki değeri çıkartarak GİB değişimi (∆GİB). her muayene periyodu için hesaplandı. GİB düşüşü (+). GİB yükselmesi (-) değerlikle ifade edildi. Bulgular: PEX´li olgularda ort. ameliyat öncesi GİB 14.9±3.7 mmHg. PEX´siz kataraktlı olgularda 14.6±3.2 mmHg olup fark istatiksel olarak anlamsızdı (p>0.05). Ameliyat sonrası l.gün. ortalama GİB PEX´li ve PEX´siz olgularda sırasıyla 14.3±5.5 mmHg ve 16.2±5.9mmHg. 1. haftada 14.3±4.9 mmHg ve 15.1±5.1 mmHg. 1. ayda 13.5±3.O ve 15.7±5.0 mmHg. 3. ayda ise 13.5±3.4 ve 14.4±3.6 mmHg olarak saptandı. Her muayene periyodundaki ölçümlerde fark istatistiksel olarak anlamsızdı (p>0.05). Ameliyat öncesi ve ameliyat sonrası 1. gündeki GİB değişimi PEX´li ve PEX´siz olgularda sırasıyla 0.5 ve -1.5 mmHg. 1. gün ve 1. hafta arasında 2.5 ve 1.0 mmHg. 1. hafta ve 1. ay arasında 0.7 ve -0.5 mmHg. 1. ay ve 3. ay arasında 0.4 ve 1.2 mmHg olarak saptandı. Hiçbir takip döneminde. gruplar arasında fark istatiksel olarak anlamlı değildi. Sonuç: Fakoemülsifikasyonlu katarakt ameliyatının PEX´li ve PEX´siz olgularda ameliyat sonrası GİB´ında anlamlı bir değişiklik yapmadığı gözlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKDAĞ, S., ONURSEVER, N., SEVÜK, M., ALTINTAŞ, A. G. K., SOLAK, D. U., CAN, İ. (2022). Comparison of IOP changes after phacoemulsification in eyes with and without pseudoexfoliation. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 5, 389–394. https://ajindex.com/articles/638720

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Shingleton BS, Gomell LS, Donoghve MW, Boylus SL, King R. Long-term_Changes in intraocular pressure after clear corneal phacoemulsification: Normal patients gloucoma suspect and glaucuma patients. J. Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:885-890
  2. Tonako T, Inove H, Kuda S, Ogawa T. Relationship between postoperative intraocular pressure elevation and residual sodium hyaluronate following phacoemulsification and aspiration. J. Cataract Refract Surg 1997; 23: 284-288
  3. Meyer MA, Savitt ML, Kopitas E: The effect of phacoemulsification on aqueous outflow facility. Ophthalmology 1997; 104:1221-1227
  4. Umurhan JC, Eltutör K, Akkan F, Akçetin T, Özveren F: Pseudoeksfoliasyon sendromlu gözlerde katarakt cerrahisi komplikasyonları ve ön kamara derinliği. T Oft Gaz 2002; 32 (311): 431-435
  5. Georgopolos GT, Chalkiodakis J, Livir-Rullatos G, Theodossiadis P, Theodossiadis GP: Combined clear corneal phacoemulsification and trabecular aspiration in the treatment of pseudoexfoiiative glaucoma associated with cataract. Caraeges Arch Clih Exp Ophthalmol 2000; 238: 816-821
  6. Ocakoğlu Ö, Köylüoğlu N, Tamçelik N, Özkan Ş: Pseudoeksfolyasyonhı gözlerde oküler kan akımı. T Oft Gaz 2002; 32:168-172
  7. Koçak Altıntaş, Dabıl H, Koçak Midillioğlu İ, Duman S: Katarakt cerrahisinin pseudoeksfolyasyonlu gözlerde erken ve geç dönem göz içi basıncına etkisi. T.Klin.Oftalmoloji 1999; 8: 122-127
  8. Merker A, Damji KF, Mintsioulis G, Hodge WG. Intraocular pressure decrease after phacoemulsification in patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27: 528-532
  9. Mitchell P, Wang J J, Hourihan F: The relationship betvveçn glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation. Arch Ophthalmol 1999; 117:1319-1324
  10. Jacobi PC, Dietlein TS, Krieglstein GK: Comparative study of trabecular aspiration vs Trabeculectomy in Glaucoma Triple Procedure to Treat Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1999; 117: 1311-1318
  11. Jacobi PC, Dietlein TS, Krieglstein GK: Effect of Trabecular Aspiration on intraocular Pressure in Pigment Dispersion Syndrome and Pigmentary Glaucoma, Ophthalmol 2000; 107:417-421
  12. Suzuki R, Tonaka K, Sogora T, Fujiwara N: Reduction of intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification and aspiration with intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmologica 1994; 208: 254-258
  13. Suzuki R, Kuroki S, Fujiwara N: Ten-year follow-up of intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification and aspiration with intraocular lens implantation performed by the some surgeon Ophthalmo