Journals / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1

Ultrasonic power delivery modalities during phacoemulsification surgery

Fakoemulsifikasyon cerrahisinde ultrason gücünün kullanım modaliteleri

Pages
68–74
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, we tried to discuss the latest innovations in phaco machines and backgrounds of the various ultrasound delivery systems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:After introduction of the ultrasonic power for the removal of cataractous crystalline lens into the ophthalmic surgery by Kelman during 70's, phacoemulsification gained wide acceptance and has been the standart technic of today.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The diversity of phaco machines increased with technical improvements and various methods of ultrasound delivery modalities were introduced.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, we tried to discuss the latest innovations in phaco machines and backgrounds of the various ultrasound delivery systems.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

After introduction of the ultrasonic power for the removal of cataractous crystalline lens into the ophthalmic surgery by Kelman during 70's, phacoemulsification gained wide acceptance and has been the standart technic of today. The diversity of phaco machines increased with technical improvements and various methods of ultrasound delivery modalities were introduced. In this review, we tried to discuss the latest innovations in phaco machines and backgrounds of the various ultrasound delivery systems.

Özet

Katarakt cerrahisinde, ultrason gücünün nukleus fragmantasyonu için kullanılabileceği Kelman tarafından 70'li yıllarda oftalmoloji dünyasına tanıtıldıktan sonra fakoemülsifikasyon yöntemi giderek daha yaygın kullanım alanı bulmuş ve bugün standart teknik halini almıştır. Teknolojik gelişmeler eşliğinde, cihaz çeşitliliği artmış ve ultrason gücünün oküler dokulara aktarımı için farklı modaliteler gündeme gelmiştir. Bu yazıda, son yıllarda fakoemülsifikasyon cihazlarında gelişen teknolojileri ve değişik ultrason modalitelerini irdelemeye çalıştık.

🔖

Cite This Article

CİNHÜSEYİNOĞLU, N., YAMAN, A., ÇELİK, L., ARIKAN, G., KAYNAK, S., KOÇAK, N. (2022). Ultrasonic power delivery modalities during phacoemulsification surgery. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1, 68–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/638709

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Fishkind WJ, Neuhann TF, Steinert RF: The Phaco Machine: The Physical Principles Guiding Its Operation. In: Steinert RF, editor. Cataract Surgery. 2nd Ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004. Chapter 7; pp. 61-77
  2. Fishkind WJ: The Phaco machine: How It Acts And Reacts. In Agarwal S, Agarwal A, Agarwal A, editors. Phacoemulsification. 3rd Edition. New Delhi: Jaypee; 2004. Chapter 8; pp. 87-98
  3. Buratto L: The Physical Principles of Phacoemulsification. In Buratto L, editor. Phacoemulsification: Principles and Technics. Thorofare: Slack; 1998. Chapter 2; pp.21- 32
  4. Beesley RD, Olson RJ, Brady SE: The effect of prolonged phacoemulsification time on the corneal endothelium. Ann Ophthalmol 1986; 18:216-9, 222
  5. Cunha-Vaz JG, Travassos A: Breakdown of the blood retinal barriers and cystoid macular edema. Surv Ophthalmol 1984;28:485-92
  6. Tsuneoka H: MICS with Ultrasounds. Fundamentals and Basic Experimental Studies. In Alio JL, Prats JLR, Galal A, editors. MICS- Microincisional Cataract Surgery. Panama: Highlights of Ophthalmology; 2004. Chapter 2; pp.5-11
  7. El-Maghraby A, Anwar M, el Sayyad F et al: Effect of incision size on early postoperative visual rehabilitiation after cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1993; 19:494-8
  8. Koch DD, Lindstrom RL: Controlling astigmatism in cataract surgery. Semin Ophthalmol 1992;7:224-33
  9. Köhnen T, Dick B, Jakobi KW: Comparison of the induced astigmatism after temporal clear corneal tunnel incisions of different sizes. J Cataract Refract Surg 1995;21:417-24
  10. Levy JH, Pisaccano AM, Chadwick K: Astigmatic changes after cataract surgery with 5.1 and 3.5 mm sutureless incisions. J Cataract Refract Surg 1994;20:630-3
  11. Martin RG, SandersDR, Miller JD, et al: Effect of cataract wound incision size on acute changes in corneal topography. J Cataract Refract Surg 1993; 19(Suppl): 170-7
  12. Neumann AC, McCarty GR, SandersDR, Raanan MG: Small incisions to control astigmatism during cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 1989; 15:78-84
  13. Steinert RF, Brint SF, White SM, Fine IH: Astigmatism after small incision cataract surgery: a prospective, randomized, multicenter comparison of 4- and 6.5 mm incisions. Ophthalmology 1991;98:417-24. [published erratum in Ophthalmology 1997; 104:1370] 14. Ernest PH: Cataract incision architecture. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1994;34:31-57
  14. Fine IH: Architecture and construction of a self-sealing incision for cataract surgery. J Cataract Re