Journals / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1

Phacoemulsification surgery after or combining with pars plana vitrectomy

Pars plana vitrektomi sonrası ve pars plana vitrektomi ile kombine yapılan fakoemülsifikasyon cerrahisi

Pages
32–36
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: Although there are some problems such as anterior chamber and capsule fluctuations in phacoemulsification surgery after PPV and more frequent postoperative transient complications in combined phacoemulsification and PPV surgery, the results of both groups were reasonably satisfactory.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE: To investigate the results and complications of phacoemulsification surgery after or combining with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) METHODS: Forty-one eyes undergoing phacoemulsification after PPV (group 1) and 26 eyes combined phacoemulsification and PPV (group 2) were included to our study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:RESULTS: Intraoperative findings were acute anterior chamber and pupil alteration in 26 cases (63.41%), increased posterior capsule mobility and flaccidity in 13 cases (31.70%) and zonular dialysis in 3 cases (7.31%) in the first group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: Although there are some problems such as anterior chamber and capsule fluctuations in phacoemulsification surgery after PPV and more frequent postoperative transient complications in combined phacoemulsification and PPV surgery, the results of both groups were reasonably satisfactory.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the results and complications of phacoemulsification surgery after or combining with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) METHODS: Forty-one eyes undergoing phacoemulsification after PPV (group 1) and 26 eyes combined phacoemulsification and PPV (group 2) were included to our study. Indications of vitrectomy, preoperative and postoperative best corrected visual acuities (BCVA) and intraoperative and postoperative problems were evaluated. RESULTS: Intraoperative findings were acute anterior chamber and pupil alteration in 26 cases (63.41%), increased posterior capsule mobility and flaccidity in 13 cases (31.70%) and zonular dialysis in 3 cases (7.31%) in the first group. Acute fluctuations in the anterior chamber depth occured only in one case (3.84%) which had myopia and retinal detachment in the second group. Postoperatively, except intensive pigment reaction in 5 cases (12.19%), no problem was observed in group 1, whereas anterior chamber reaction in 20 eyes (76.92%), transient hyphema in one eye and intensive fibrinous exudation in 2 eyes were found in group 2. Best corrected visual acuities improved in 25 (60.97%), no change was observed in 12 and decreased in 4 cases of group 1; improved in 19 (73.04%), was the same in 4 and decreased in 3 cases of group 2. CONCLUSION: Although there are some problems such as anterior chamber and capsule fluctuations in phacoemulsification surgery after PPV and more frequent postoperative transient complications in combined phacoemulsification and PPV surgery, the results of both groups were reasonably satisfactory.

Özet

AMAÇ: Pars plana vitrektomi (PPV) sonrasında veya kombine yapılan fakoemülsifikasyon cerrahisi sonuçlarını ve komplikasyonlarını irdelemek YÖNTEM: Daha önce PPV geçirmiş ve sonra fakoemülsifikasyon cerrahisi uygulanan 41 göz (1. grup) ile kombine PPV ve fakoemülsifikasyon uygulanan 26 göz (2. grup) çalışma kapsamına alındı. Vitrektomi endikasyonu, ameliyat öncesi ve sonrası en iyi düzeltilmiş görme keskinlikleri (EİDGK), ameliyat esnasındaki ve sonrasındaki sorunlar değerlendirildi. BULGULAR: İlk grupta cerrahi sırasında 26 olguda (%63.41) ani ön kamara ve pupilla değişikliği 13’ünde (%31.70) arka kapsül hareketliliği ve esneklik artışı, üç olguda (%7.31) ise zonüler diyaliz görüldü. 2. grupta ise ani ön kamara derinlik değişikliği, retina dekolmanı ve miyopisi olan sadece tek bir olguda (% 3.84) izlendi. Ameliyat sonrası dönemde, 1. grupta 5 olgudaki (%12.19) yoğun pigment reaksiyonu dışında bir sorun gözlenmezken, 2. grupta 20 gözde (%76.92) ön kamarada reaksiyon, bir gözde geçici hifema ve iki gözde ise yoğun fibrinöz eksudasyon saptandı. EİDGK 1. gruptaki olguların 25’inde (%60.97) arttı, 12’sinde aynı kaldı, 4’ünde ise azaldı. 2. grupta ise 19 olguda (%73.04) artış sağlanırken, 4’ünde aynı kaldı, 3’ünde de azaldı. TARTIŞMA: Vitrektomi geçirmiş gözlerin katarakt ameliyatında ön kamara ve kapsül hareketliliği artmasına bağlı değişiklikler, kombine cerrahide ise ameliyat sonrası geçici problemlerin daha sık gelişmesi gibi sorunlar olmakla beraber her iki olgu grubunda da sonuçlar oldukça tatminkardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, Ö. K., ARSAN, A. K., GÜVELİ, A. K., ORAL, Y. O., OĞUZ, E. T. (2022). Phacoemulsification surgery after or combining with pars plana vitrectomy. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1, 32–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/638496

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Grusha YO, Masket S, Miller KM: Phacoemulsification and lens implantation after pars plana vitrectomy. Ophthalmology. 1998
  2. Novak MA, Rice TA, Michels RG, Aver C: The crystalline lens after vitrectomy for diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 1984
  3. De Bustros S, Thompson ST, Michels RG. ve ark: Nuclear sclerosis after vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membranes. Am J Ophthalmol 1988
  4. Lucke KH, Foerster MH, Laqua H: Long term results of vitrectomy and silicone oil in 500 cases of complicated retinal detachments. Am J Ophthalmol. 1987
  5. Suarez-Tata M, Villasenor-Diez J, Suarez-Tata LM ve ark: Phacoemulsification cataract surgery in vitrectomi-zed eye. Arch Soc Esp Ophthalmol. 2004
  6. Diaz Lacelle VD, Orbegoza Garate FJO, Martinez Alday NM, Garrido JAL, Agesta JA: Phacoemulsification cataract surgery in vitrectomized eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998
  7. Pardo MA, Muriel HA, Abraira V, Muroz NFJ, Murube J: Phacoemulsification in previously vitrectomized patients: an analysis of the surgical results in 100 eyes as well as the factors contributing to the cataract formation. Eur. J Ophthalmol. 2006
  8. Yılmaz N, Bardak Y: Vitrektomize Gözlerde Fakoemülsi-fikasyon Sonuçlarımız. T. Oft. Gaz. 2007
  9. Kim SH, Chung JW, Chung H, Yu HG: Phacoemulsification and foldable intraocular lens implantation combined with vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade for severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004
  10. Lahey JM, Francis RR, Kearney JJ: Combining phacoemulsification with pars plana vitrectomy in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a series of 223 cases. Ophthalmology. 2003
  11. Kim NJ, Yu HG: A phacovitrectomy with a clear corneal incision for a full-thickness macular hole. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2006
  12. Androudi S, Ahmed M, Fione T, Brazitikos P, Foster CS: Combined pars plana vitrectomy and phacoemulsification to restore visual acuity in patients with chronic uveitis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005
  13. Blankenship GW, Machemer R: Long-term diabetic vitrectomy results. Report of 10 year follow-up. Ophthal-molgy. 1985
  14. Blankenship GW: Stability of pars plana vitrectomy results for diabetic retinopathy complications
  15. a comparison of five-year and six-month postvitrectomy findings. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981
  16. Arsan AK, Giray H, Duman S: Diyabetik olgularda eks-trakapsüler katarakt e