SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 6

Clinical and surgical results of iris-claw intraocular lens implantation

İris kıskaçlı göz içi lens implantasyonunda klinik ve cerrahi sonuçlar

Ali Hakan DURUKAN
Volkan HÜRMERİÇ
Fazıl Cüneyt ERDURMAN
Gökçen GÖKÇE
Tarkan MUMCUOĞLU
Osman Melih CEYLAN
Pages
323–327
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was a statistically significant difference between pre- and postoperative visual acuities (Wilcoxon test: p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To investigate the clinical and surgical results of iris-claw intraocular lens implantation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: Twenty-three eyes of 22 patients that underwent implantation of posterior chamber iris-claw intraocular lens (IOL) at Gülhane Military Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology between April 2008 and June 2010 were enrolled into the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was a statistically significant difference between pre- and postoperative visual acuities (Wilcoxon test: p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the clinical and surgical results of iris-claw intraocular lens implantation. Material and Method: Twenty-three eyes of 22 patients that underwent implantation of posterior chamber iris-claw intraocular lens (IOL) at Gülhane Military Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology between April 2008 and June 2010 were enrolled into the study. Fourteen patients were male and eight were female with a mean age of 68.04±17.2 (range: 15-98) years. The results of 23 eyes operated because of aphakia (n=11), IOL dislocation (n=9), penetrating injury (n=1), and microspherophakia (n=2, both eyes of one patient) were evaluated retrospectively. Results: The average follow-up time was 10.78±3 (range: 3-15) months. At the final examination, eighteen eyes (78.3%) showed improvement in the visual acuity. There was a statistically significant difference between pre- and postoperative visual acuities (Wilcoxon test: p

Özet

Amaç: İris kıskaçlı göz içi lens implantasyonunun klinik ve cerrahi sonuçlarını araştırmak. Gereç ve Yöntem: Nisan 2008-Haziran 2010 tarihleri arasında Gülhane Askeri Tıp Akademisi Göz Kliniği’nde arka kamaraya iris kıskaçlı göz içi lens implantasyonu uygulanan 22 hastanın 23 gözü çalışmaya dâhil edildi. Hastaların 14’ü erkek, 8’i kadındı. Hastaların ortalama yaşı 68,04±17,2 (15-98) idi. Afaki (n=11), göz içi lens (GİL) dislokasyonu (n=9), penetran yaralanma (n=1), mikrosferofaki (n=2; aynı hastanın her iki gözü) nedeniyle opere edilen 23 gözün sonuçları geriye dönük olarak incelendi.Sonuçlar: Hastaların ortalama takip süresi 10,78±3 (3-15) aydı. Son kontrol muayenesinde 23 gözün 18’inde (%78,3) ameliyat sonrası görme keskinliğinde artış oldu. Ameliyat öncesi ve sonrası görme keskinliği seviyesi arasındaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu (Wilcoxon testi p

🔖

Cite This Article

DURUKAN, A. H., HÜRMERİÇ, V., ERDURMAN, F. C., GÖKÇE, G., MUMCUOĞLU, T., CEYLAN, O. M. (2022). Clinical and surgical results of iris-claw intraocular lens implantation. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 6, 323–327. https://ajindex.com/articles/638457

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Erdurman C, Mutlu FM, Civelekler M, Uysal Y, Mumcuoğlu T. Tek Gözlü Hastalarda Katarakt Cerrahisi Sonuçları. Glokom-Katarakt. 2006;4;271-4
  2. Özçetin H. İkincil Göz İçi Lens Uygulaması. Editör: Özçetin H. Katarakt ve Tedavisi. 1.baskı. İstanbul. Scala Kitabevi. 2005;437
  3. Thomas J, Gregory L, Louis B. Lens and Cataract. Basic and Clinical Science Course. San Francisco USA. American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2007-2008; Section11:164
  4. Wagoner MD, Cox TA, Ariyasu RG, Jacobs DS, Karp CL; American Academy of Ophthalmology. Intraocular lens implantation in the absence of capsular support: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:840-59
  5. Adam R, Bohnke M, Korner F. Results of posterior chamber lens implantation with trans-scleral sulcus suture fixation. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1995;206:286-91
  6. Chaudhry NA, Belfort A, Flynn HW Jr, Tabandeh H, Smiddy WE, Murray TG. Combined lensectomy, vitrectomy and scleral fixation of intraocular lens implant after closed-globe injury. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1999;30:375-81
  7. Vote BJ, Tranos P, Bunce C, Charteris DG, Da Cruz L. Long-term outcome of combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral fixated sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:308-12
  8. Yeom IY, Chang JH, Jung YC. A clinical study on implantation of anterior chamber intraocular lens and posterior chamber intraocular lens by scleral fixation in eyes without capsular or zonular support. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1993;34:950-5
  9. Mohr A, Hengerer F, Eckardt C. Retropupillare Fixation der Irisklauenlinse bei Aphakie-Einjahresergebnisse einer neuen Implantationstechnik. Ophthalmologe. 2002;99:580-3
  10. Pop M, Payette Y. Initial results of endothelial cell counts after Artisan lens for phakic eyes: an evaluation of the United States Food and Drug Administration Ophtec Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:309-17
  11. Rijneveld WJ, Beekhuis WH, Hassman EF, Dellaert MM, Geerards AJ. Iris claw lens: anterior and posterior iris surface fixation in the absence of capsular support during penetrating keratoplasty. J Refract Corneal Surg. 1994;10:14-9
  12. Rüfer F, Saeger M, Nölle B, Roider J. Implantation of retropupillar iris claw lenses with and without combined penetrating keratoplasty. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;247:457-62
  13. Baykara M, Ozcetin H, Yilmaz S, Timuçin OB. Posterior iris fixation of the iris-claw intraocular lens implantation through a scleral tunnel incision.