Journals / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 5

Diabetik makula ödeminde MP-1 Mikroperimetri ile fiksasyon stabilitesi ve makuler duyarlılığın değerlendirilmesi

Assessment of macular sensitivity and fixation stability by MP-1 Microperimetry in diabetic macular edema

Pages
310–315
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was significantly lower in the CSME group than the control group (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To evaluate macular light sensitivity and fixation stability in subjects with clinically significant macular edema (CSME) related to diabetes mellitus.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ma te ri al and Method: Thirty eyes of 22 patients with CSME, as defined by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study, and 32 eyes of 32 healthy subjects were enrolled in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was significantly lower in the CSME group than the control group (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate macular light sensitivity and fixation stability in subjects with clinically significant macular edema (CSME) related to diabetes mellitus. Ma te ri al and Method: Thirty eyes of 22 patients with CSME, as defined by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study, and 32 eyes of 32 healthy subjects were enrolled in this study. Microperimetry was performed with the Micro Perimeter MP-1 in both groups. The mean retinal sensitivities at central 4°, at central 12° and at central 20° were measured. The mean extent of preferred retinal locus (PRL), fixation stability and fixation location were calculated using fixation test in MP-1 microperimeter. Statistical analysis was performed using student t-test and chi- square test. Results: The mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was significantly lower in the CSME group than the control group (p

Özet

Amaç: Diabetes mellitusa bağlı klinik olarak anlamlı makula ödemi (KAMÖ) olgularında fiksasyon stabilitesi ve makula ışık duyarlılığını değerlendirmek. Gereç ve Yöntem: Diabetik Retinopati Erken Tedavi Çalışması tanı kriterlerine göre klinik olarak anlamlı makula ödemli 22 olgunun 30 gözü ve sağlıklı 32 olgunun 32 gözü çalışmaya dahil edildi. Tüm olgulara Micro Perimeter MP-1 ile mikroperimetri uygulandı. Santral 4, 12 ve 20 derecelik alanlarda ortalama retinal duyarlılık ölçüldü. MP-1 mikroperimetrede fiksasyon testi kullanılarak tercih edilen retinal alan (TERA) genişliği, fiksasyon stabilitesi ve alanı hesaplandı. Student t testi ve ki kare testi kullanılarak istatistiksel analiz yapıldı. Sonuçlar: KAMÖ grubunda ortalama en iyi düzeltilmiş görme keskinliği (EDGK) kontrol grubuna göre anlamlı olarak düşüktü (p

🔖

Cite This Article

YAVAŞ, G., İNAN, Ü. İ., KÜSBECİ, T. (2022). Diabetik makula ödeminde MP-1 Mikroperimetri ile fiksasyon stabilitesi ve makuler duyarlılığın değerlendirilmesi. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 5, 310–315. https://ajindex.com/articles/638293

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ferris FL 3rd, Patz A. Macular edema. A complication of diabetic retinopathy. Surv Ophthalmol. 1984; 28:452-61.
  2. Klein R, Moss SE, Klein BE, Davis MD, DeMets DL. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. XI. The incidence of macular edema. Ophthalmology. 1989;96:1501-10.
  3. Arend O, Remky A, Evans D, Stüber R, Harris A. Contrast sensitivity loss is coupled with capillary dropout in patients with diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:1819-24.
  4. Nussenblatt RB, Kaufmann SC, Paletsine AG, Davis MD, Ferris FL 3rd. Macular thickening and visual acuity: measurement in patients with cystoid macular edema. Ophthalmology. 1987;94:1134-9.
  5. Rohrschneder K, Bultmann S, Gluck R, Kruse FE, Fendrich T, Völcker HE. Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope Fundus Perimetry Before and After Laser Photocoagulation for Clinically Significant Diabetic Macular Edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:27-32.
  6. Sawa M, Gomi F, Toyoda A, Ikuno Y, Fujikado T, Tano Y. A Microperimeter That Provides Fixation Pattern and Retinal Sensitivity Measurement. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2006;50:111-5.
  7. Mori F, Ishiko S, Kitaya N, et al. Use of scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry in clinically significant macular edema in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2002;46:650-5.
  8. Okada K, Yamamoto S, Mizunoya S, Hoshino A, Arai M, Takatsuna Y. Correlation of retinal sensitivity measured with fundus-related microperimetry to visual acuity and retinal thickness in eyes with diabetic macular edema. Eye (Lond). 2006;20:805-9.
  9. Kube T, Schmidt S, Toonen F, Kirchhof B, Wolf S. Fixation stability and macular light sensitivity in patients with diabetic maculopathy: a microperimetric study with a scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmologica. 2005;219:16-20.
  10. Rohrschneider K, Springer C, Bultmann S, Volcker HE. Microperimetry - comparison between the micro perimeter 1 and scanning laser ophthalmoscope-fundus perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:125-34.
  11. OzdemirH, Karacorlu SA, Senturk F, Karacorlu M, Uysal O. Assessment of macular function by microperimetry in unilateral resolved central serous chorioretinopathy. Eye (Lond). 2008;22:204-8.
  12. Crossland MD, Culham LE, Kabanarou SA, Rubin GS. Preferred retinal locus development in patients with macular disease. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1579-85. 13. Midena E, Radin PP, Pilotto E, Ghirlando A, Convento E, Varano M. Fixation pattern and macular sensitivity in eyes with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. A microperim