Journals / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1

Prognostic factors in blunt eye trauma

Künt göz travmalarında prognostik faktörler

Pages
32–38
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the one-way analysis of variance, the effect of initial visual acuity (p = 0.039), incision size (p = 0.029), relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To determine the factors affecting the outcome of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in blunt ocular trauma cases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: 142 eyes of 142 patients, who were admitted to the 2nd Eye Clinic Emergency Service of M.H.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the one-way analysis of variance, the effect of initial visual acuity (p = 0.039), incision size (p = 0.029), relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the factors affecting the outcome of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in blunt ocular trauma cases. Material and Method: 142 eyes of 142 patients, who were admitted to the 2nd Eye Clinic Emergency Service of M.H. Ankara Training and Research Hospital between June 2007 and August 2008, with blunt ocular trauma were prospectively included in the study in terms of the last-measured BCVA, the factors affecting it, and the ensuing complications. Results: Patient age ranged from 3 to 76 years (mean age: 31.9 ± 17.6 years). One hundred and seven cases (75.4%) were male and 35 (24.6%) were female. The last-measured BCVA in 120 cases (84.5%) was found to be log MAR ≤ 1.00 and in 22 cases (15.5%) was log MAR > 1.00. According to the one-way analysis of variance, the effect of initial visual acuity (p = 0.039), incision size (p = 0.029), relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) (p

Özet

Amaç: Künt göz travmalarında sonuç en iyi düzeltilmiş görme keskinliği (EDGK) üzerine etkisi olan faktörleri belirlemek. Ge reç ve Yöntem: S.B. Ankara Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi 2. Göz Kliniği Acil Bölümüne Haziran 2007- Ağustos 2008 tarihleri arasında künt göz travması ile başvuran 142 hastanın 142 gözü son ölçülen EDGK ile buna etki eden faktörler ve ortaya çıkan komplikasyonlar açısından prospektif olarak çalışmaya dahil edildi. Sonuçlar: Hastaların yaşları 3 ile 76 arasında değişmekte olup ortalama yaş 31,9±17,6 yıl idi. Olguların 107si (%75,4) erkek, 35'i (%24,6) kadındı. Son ölçülen EDGK 120 olguda log MAR ≤1,00 (%84,5), 22 olguda log MAR >1,00 de (%15,5) olduğu görüldü. Tek yönlü varyans analizine göre, son ölçülen EDGKnin kötü seyretmesi üzerinde, ilk görme keskinliği (p=0,039), kesi büyüklüğü (p=0,029), rölatif afferent pupil defekti (RAPD) (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KIZILOĞLU, M., GÜNGÖR, T. K., YALNIZ, Z. A., ÖRNEK, F., BURCU, A. (2022). Prognostic factors in blunt eye trauma. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1, 32–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/638220

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Ligget PE, Pinje KJ, Barlow W, Ragen M, Ryan SJ. Ocular trauma in an urban population. Ophthalmology. 1990;97:581-4.
  2. Klopfer J, Tielsch JM, Vitale S, See LC, Canner JK. Ocular trauma in the United States, eye injuries resulting in hospitalization 1984 through 1987. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:838-42.
  3. Delori F, Pomerontzeff D, Cox Ms. Deformation of the globe under high speed impact. It is relation to contüsion injuries. Invest ophthalmol. 1969;8:290-301.
  4. Sastry SM, Paul BK, Bain L. et al: Ocular trauma among major trauma victims in a regional center. The Journal of Trauma. 1993;34:223-26.
  5. Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD, Heimann K, Jeffers JB, Treister G. A standardized classification of ocular trauma. Ophthalmology. 1996;103: 240-43.
  6. Pieramici DJ, Sternberg P, Aaberg TM. et al: A system for classifying mechanical injuries of the eye globe. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 1997;123:820-31.
  7. Duman M, Akkan F, Umurhan J, Eltutar K. Künt göz travmalarının klinik değerlendirilmesi. İstanbul Tıp Dergisi. 2004;1:22-26.
  8. Özdemir M, Yaşar T, Şimşek Ş, Durmuş A. Göz travması olgularımızın epidemiyolojik değerlendirmesi. Van Tıp Dergisi. 2002;1:6-11.
  9. Çakırer D, Güzey M, Dikici K, Tolun H. Göz travması olgularımızın epidemiyolojik incelenmesi. T Klin Oftalmoloji. 1995;4:13-16.
  10. Sternberg PJ, De Juan EJ, Michels RG, Auer C. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in penetrating ocular injuries. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984;98:467-72.
  11. Pieramici DJ, MacCumber MW, Hümayun MU, Marsh MJ, De Juan Jr E. Open globe injuries. Update on types of injuries and visual results. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:1798-1803. Barr CC. Prognostic factors in corneoscleral lacerations. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983:101:919-24.
  12. De Juan E, Stemberg, P, Michels R. Blunt ocular injuries: types of injuries and visual results. Ophthalmology. 1983;90:1318-22.
  13. Hutton WL, Fuller DG. Factors influencing final visual results in severely injured eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984;97:715-22.
  14. Esmali B, Elner SG, Schork A, Elner VM. Visual outcome and ocular survival after blunt eye trauma. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:393-400.
  15. Williams DF, Mieler WF, Abrams GW, Lewis H. Results and prognostic factors in penetrating ocular injuries with retained intraocular foreign bodies. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:911-16.
  16. Moncreiff WF, Scheribel KJ. Penetrating injuries of the eye: a statistical survey. Am J Ophthalmol. 1945;28:1212-20.
  17. Groessl S, Nanda SK, Mieler WF. Assault-related penetrating ocular injury. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;116:26-33.
  18. Brinton GS, A