Journals / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 6

Surgical outcome of autogenic hard palate grafts in lower eyelid reconstruction

Alt kapak rekonstrüksiyonunda otojen sert damak mukoza grefti uygulama sonuçları

Pages
442–445
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Comprehension of the anatomy, proper surgical technique, and postoperative care can decrease the rate of these complications. (Turk J Ophthalmol 2013; 43: 442-5)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Pur­po­se: To evaluate the surgical outcome of autogenic hard palate mucosal grafts (HPMGs) in full-thickness lower eyelid reconstruction following tumor excision.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ma­te­ri­al and Met­hod: The medical records of patients who had full-thickness lower eyelid tumor excision between 2005 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Comprehension of the anatomy, proper surgical technique, and postoperative care can decrease the rate of these complications. (Turk J Ophthalmol 2013; 43: 442-5)
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Pur­po­se: To evaluate the surgical outcome of autogenic hard palate mucosal grafts (HPMGs) in full-thickness lower eyelid reconstruction following tumor excision. Ma­te­ri­al and Met­hod: The medical records of patients who had full-thickness lower eyelid tumor excision between 2005 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Seven patients who had HPMG for posterior lamellar reconstruction were included in the study. Graft complications like necrosis, contraction, excessive mucous discharge, and potential problems in the graft harvesting site and technique were evaluated. Re­sults: Seven eyelid reconstructions with HPMG were performed on 4 female and 3 male patients with an age range of 48 to 71 years at surgery. The patients were followed for 6 to 56 months. Two patients had inferior eyelid retraction - one of them was severe and the other one was mild. None of the patients had HPMG necrosis. Donor site haemorrhage occurred in two patients which was controlled with direct pressure and cauterization in the early postoperative period. Dis­cus­si­on: HPMGs have been the golden standard for the reconstruction of posterior lamellar eyelid defects. The main problem about these grafts is that the oral cavity is an unusual region for ophthalmologists with potential complications arising from the hard palate. Comprehension of the anatomy, proper surgical technique, and postoperative care can decrease the rate of these complications. (Turk J Ophthalmol 2013; 43: 442-5)

Özet

Amaç: Tümör eksizyonu sonrası tam kat alt kapak defektlerinin rekonstrüksiyonunda sert damak mukoza grefti (SDMG) kullanımının değerlendirilmesi. Ge­reç ve Yön­tem: 2005-2009 yılları arasında, alt kapakta tümör nedeniyle tam kat eksizyon uygulanan hastaların kayıtları retrospektiolarak değerlendirildi. Arka lamel rekonstrüksiyonunda SDMG kullanılan 7 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. SDMGinde kontraksiyon, nekrozgreft kaynaklı sekresyon artışı, sert damaktan greft alınma metodu ve alınma yeri ile ilgili yaşanabilecek sorunlar değerlendirildi. Sonuçlar: Ameliyat sırasındaki yaşları 48-71 arasındaki 7 hastaya (4 kadın, 3 erkek) tümör eksizyonu sonrasında SDMG ile arka lamerekonstrüksiyonu uygulandı. Ameliyat sonrası takipleri 6-56 ay arasında olan hastaların birinde ciddi, bir diğerinde ise hafif derecede alt kapak retraksiyonu gelişti. Sert damak mukoza greftinde nekroz problemi yaşanmadı. İki hastada ameliyat sonrası sert damak bölgesinde kanama oldubaskılı pansuman ve hafif koterizasyon ile kanama kontrol altına alındı. Tar­t fl­ma: SDMG alt kapakta arka lamel rekonstrüksiyonlarında altın standart olarak kullanılmaktadır. Bu greftlerle ilgili ana problem ağız içinin göz doktorlarının alışık olmadıkları bir bölge olması, ve sert damak bölgesine ait komplikasyonların olabilmesidir. Anatomiye daha hakim olunması, uygun cerrahi teknik ve operasyon sonrası bakımla bu komplikasyonlar azaltılabilir. (Turk J Ophthalmol 2013; 43442-5)

🔖

Cite This Article

YABAŞ, Ö. K., BAHÇECİ, İ. Ş., ZİYLAN, Ş. (2022). Surgical outcome of autogenic hard palate grafts in lower eyelid reconstruction. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 6, 442–445. https://ajindex.com/articles/638208

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Nunery WR. Reconstruction of the upper eyelid. Ophthalmology monographs. AAO. 1994;20:225-35. Holds J, ed. Orbit, Eyelids and Lacrimal System. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2004:188-93.
  2. Wesley RE, Klippenstein KA, Gallo SA, Biesman BS. Full-thickness eyelid reconstruction. In: Chen P editors. Oculoplastic Surgery (The Essentials). New York: Thieme; 2001:243-62.
  3. Dion P, Willem AB. Orbicularis muscle advancement flap combined with free posterior and anterior lamellar grafts. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:189-94. Ünal M. Kapak cerrahisinde yenilikler. MN Oftalmoloji. 1997;4:79-85.
  4. Cohen MS, Shorr N. Eyelid reconstruction with hard palate mucosa grafts. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;8:183-95.
  5. Wearne MJ, Sandy C, Rose GE, Pitts J, Collin JR. Autogenous hard palate mucosa: the ideal lower eyelid spacer? Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:1183-7. Siegel RJ. Palatal grafts for eyelid reconstruction. Plast reconstruct surg. 1985;76:411-6.
  6. Bartley GB, Kay PP. Posterior lamellar eyelid reconstruction with a hard palate mucosal graft. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107:609-12.
  7. Pang N, Bartley G, Bite U. Hard Palate Mucosal Grafts in Oculoplastic Surgery: Donor Site Lessons. Am J Oph. 2003;137:1021-5.
  8. Scot A. Sullivan, Roger A. Dailey Graft Contraction, A Comparison of acellular dermis versus hard palate mucosa in lower eyelid surgery ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive. Surgery. 2003;19:14-24.
  9. Leibovitch I, Malhotra R, Selva D. Hard palate and free tarsal grafts as posterior lamella substitutes in upper lid surgery. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:489-96.
  10. Kim JW, Kikkawa DO, Lemke BN. Donor site complications of hard palate mucosal grafting. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;13:36-9.
  11. Reiser GM, Bruno JF, Mahan PE, Larkin LH. The subepithelial connective tissue graft palatal donor site: anatomic considerations for surgeons. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1996 Apr;16:130-7.
  12. Mauriello JA Jr, Wasserman B, Allee S, Robinson L. Moulded acrylic mouthguard to control bleeding at the hard palate graft site after eyelid reconstruction. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;113:342-4.
  13. Pelletier CR, Jordan DR, Brownstein S, Li S. An unusual complication associated with hard palate mucosal grafts: presumed minor salivary gland secretion. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;14:256-60.
  14. Hatoko M, Tanaka A, Kuwahara M, Yurugi S, Niitsuma K, Iioka H. Influence of periosteum on donor healing after harvesting hard palate mucosa. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50:25-30.