SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of corneal topographical and biomechanical properties in cases with atopic dermatitis and healthy subjects

Atopik dermatitli olgularda ve sağlıklı bireylerde korneanın topografik ve biyomekaniksel özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması

Necip KARA
Burhan ENGİN
Ali DEMİRCAN
Server SERDAROĞLU
Zekai KUTLUBAY
İlker ÇANKAYA
Tolga YILMAZ
Yusuf YILDIRIM
Pages
140–144
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CCT measured with ultrasonic pachymeter was significantly lower in patients with AD compared to health controls.(P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To compare the topographic, biomechanical, and thickness properties of corneas in eyes of patients with Atopic Dermatitis (AD) and eyes of healthy individuals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: In this prospective, cross-sectional, and comparative study, 28 healthy individuals (control group) and 28 patients with AD (study group) were enrolled.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CCT measured with ultrasonic pachymeter was significantly lower in patients with AD compared to health controls.(P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the topographic, biomechanical, and thickness properties of corneas in eyes of patients with Atopic Dermatitis (AD) and eyes of healthy individuals. Methods: In this prospective, cross-sectional, and comparative study, 28 healthy individuals (control group) and 28 patients with AD (study group) were enrolled. Corneal topographical measurements using Scheimpflug camera with a Placido disc topographer (Sirius), corneal biomechanical properties using Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA), and central corneal thickness using ultrasonic pachymeter were obtained for each participitan. Results: Topographic parameters were not significantly different between both groups (p>0.05).Corneal hysteresis (CH) and Corneal resistance factor (CRF) were found same in both groups. CCT measured with ultrasonic pachymeter was significantly lower in patients with AD compared to health controls.(P

Özet

Amaç: Atopik dermatitli (AD) olgularda ve sağlıklı bireylerde korneanın topografik, biyomekaniksel ve kalınlık özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması Materyal-Metod: Bu ileriye dönük, kesitsel, ve karşılaştırılmalı çalışmaya 28 sağlıklı bireyin 28 gözü (kontrol grubu) ve 28 atopik dermatit tanılı hastanın 28 gözü (çalışma grubu) dahil edildi. Her bir katılımcının Scheimplug kamera ve Plasido disk topografi sistemi (Sirius) ile korneal topografik ölçümleri, Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) ile kornea biyomekaniksel özellikleri ultrasonik pakimetri ile santral kornea kalınlıkları elde edildi. Bulgular: Her iki grubun topografik ölçümleri arasında anlamlı fark tespit edilmedi (p>0.05). Kornea histeresis (KH) ve kornea direnç faktörü (KRF) her iki grupta benzerdi (p>0.05). Ultrasonik pakimetri ile ölçülmüş santral kornea kalınlık (SKK) ölçümleri AD hastalarda kontrol gruba göre anlamlı derecede düşük saptandı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KARA, N., ENGİN, B., DEMİRCAN, A., SERDAROĞLU, S., KUTLUBAY, Z., ÇANKAYA, İ., YILMAZ, T., YILDIRIM, Y. (2022). Comparison of corneal topographical and biomechanical properties in cases with atopic dermatitis and healthy subjects. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 3, 140–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/638193

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Sehgal VN, Jain S. Atopic dermatitis: Ocular changes. Int J Dermatol. 1994;33:11-5.
  2. Garrity JA, Liesegang TJ. Ocular complications of atopic dermatitis. Can J Ophthalmol. 1984;19: 21-4.
  3. Rao M, Victoria MS, Jabbar H, Steiner P Atopic dermatitis, asthma and eye Changes in children. J Asthma. 1981;18:47-8.
  4. Garrity JA, Liesegang TJ. Ocular complications of atopic dermatitis. Can J Ophthalmol. 1984;19:21-4.
  5. Amemiya T, Matsuda H, Uehara M. Ocular findings in atopic dermatitis with special reference to the clinical features of atopic cataract. Ophthalmologica. 1980;180:129-32.
  6. Zug DA, Palay DA, Rock B. Dermatologic diagnosis and treatment of itchy red eyelids. Surv Ophthalmol. 1996;40:293-306.
  7. Casey R, Abelson MB. Atopic keratoconjunctivitis. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1997; 37:111-7.
  8. Dogru M, Okada N, Asano-Kato N, et al. Alterations of the ocular surface epithelial mucins 1, 2, 4 and the tear functions in patients with atopic keratoconjunctivitis.Clin Exp Allergy. 2006;36:1556-65.
  9. Foster CS, Calonge M. Atopic keratoconjunctivitis. Ophthalmology. 1990;97:992-1000.
  10. Tuft SJ, Kemeny DM, Dart JK, Buckley RJ. Clinical features of atopic keratoconjunctivitis. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:150-8.
  11. Harrison RJ, Klouda PT, Easty DL, et al. Association between keratoconus and atopy. Br J Ophthalmol. 1989;73:816-22.
  12. Dundar H, Kara N, Kaya V Bozkurt E, Yazici AT, Hekimhan PK. Unilateral superior pellucid marginal degeneration in a case with ichthyosis. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2011;34:45-8.
  13. Jain V Nair AG, Jain-Mhatre K, Shome D. Pellucidmarginalcornealdisease in a case of atopickeratoconjunctivitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2010;18:187-9. Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;42:297-319.
  14. Tuft SJ, Kemeny DM, Dart JK, Buckley RJ. Clinical features of atopic keratoconjunctivitis. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:150-8.
  15. Assiri AA, Yousuf BI, Quantock AJ, Murphy PJ. Incidence and severity of keratoconus in Asir province, Saudi Arabia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1403-6. 17. Bawazeer AM, Hodge WG, Lorimer B. Atopy and keratoconus: a multivariate analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:834-6. 18. Harrison RJ, Klouda PT, Easty DL, et al. Association between keratoconus and atopy. Br J Ophthalmol. 1989;73:816-22. 19. Ehlers N, Hansen FK, Aasved H. Biometric correlations of corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1975;53:652-9. 20. Shah S, Chatterjee A, Mathai M, et al. Relationship between corneal thickness and measured intraocular pressure in a general ophthalmology clinic. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:2