Journals / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1

The ınvolutional change of the anterior segment morphology, ıntraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude and the effect of glaucoma on this change

Ön segment morfolojisinin, göz içi basıncı ve oküler nabız basıncının involusyonel değişimi ve glokomun bu değişimdeki etkisi

Pages
27–31
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Discussion: Anterior segment morphology, IOP and OPA change with age, while POAG does not affect the involutional changes in

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To assess the involutional change of the anterior segment morphology, intraocular pressure, ocular pulse amplitude and the effect of glaucoma on these parameters.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: Fifty-five old patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) (group 1), 51 old (group 2) and 84 young individuals (group 3) without glaucoma were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Discussion: Anterior segment morphology, IOP and OPA change with age, while POAG does not affect the involutional changes in
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the involutional change of the anterior segment morphology, intraocular pressure, ocular pulse amplitude and the effect of glaucoma on these parameters. Material and Method: Fifty-five old patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) (group 1), 51 old (group 2) and 84 young individuals (group 3) without glaucoma were included in the study. We measured anterior chamber depth (ACD), anterior chamber volume (ACV), and central corneal thickness (CCT) by Scheimpflug anterior segment analyzer. Intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) were measured by dynamic contour tonometer. Intergroup comparisons were performed for each parameter. Results: ACD in groups 1, 2, and 3 was 2.77, 2.95, and 3.37, respectively, and was different between young and old individuals demonstrating a decrease with increasing age (p: 0). ACV in groups 1,2, and 3 was 85.05, 89.6, and 127.2 mm3, respectively, being different between young and old individuals and decreased with increasing age (p: 0). CCT in groups 1, 2, and 3 was 539.2, 539.5, and 556.7 μm, respectively, and was different between young and old individuals showing a decrease with increasing age. IOP (16.4, 15.4, and 14,8 mmHg in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively) was insignificantly higher in old patients without glaucoma than in young individuals. OPA (2.5±0.8 mmHg, 2.3±0.7 mmHg, and 1.9±0.8 mmHg in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively) increased with age, and the difference was significant between young and old individuals. The diagnosis of POAG did not result in a significant difference between old patients for all parameters. Discussion: Anterior segment morphology, IOP and OPA change with age, while POAG does not affect the involutional changes in

Özet

Amaç: Ön segment morfolojisi, göz içi basıncı ve oküler nabız basıncının involüsyonel değişimi ve glokomun bu parametreler üzerindeketkisinin değerlendirilmesi. Gereç ve Yöntem: PAAG tanısı olan 55 yaşlı hasta (1. Grup) ve glokom tanısı olmayan 51 yaşlı (2. Grup), 84 genç hasta (3. Grupçalışmaya dâhil edildi. Hastaların ön kamara derinliği (ÖKD), ön kamara volümü (ÖKV), santral kornea kalınlık (SKK) değerlerScheimpflug ön segment analizörüyle, göz içi basıncı (GİB) ve oküler nabız basıncı (ONB) değerleri dinamik kontür tonometresi ildeğerlendirildi. Sonuçlar: ÖKD (gruplar için sırası ile 2,77, 2.,5, 3,37 mm) genç ve yaşlı grup arasında farklıydı ve yaşla birlikte azalmaktaydı (p: 0ÖKV (gruplar için sırasıyla 85,05, 89,6, 127,2 mm3) genç ve yaşlı grup arasında farklıydı ve yaşla birlikte azalmaktaydı (p: 0). SKK (gruplar için sırasıyla 539,2, 539,5, 556,7 mikrometre) genç ve yaşlı grup arasında farklıydı ve yaşla birlikte azalmaktaydı. GİB ı ( gruplaiçin sırasıyla 16,4, 15,4, 14,8 mmHg) sağlıklı yaşlı bireylerde gençlere göre anlamsız derecede yüksekti. ONB (gruplar için sırasıyl2,5±0,8 mmHg, 2,3±0,7 mmHg, 1,9±0,8 mmHg) yaşla birlikte artmaktaydı, değişim genç ve yaşlı grup arasında anlamlıydı. Glokom tanısının yaşlı hastalar arasında herhangi bir parametre için anlamlı bir fark yaratmadığı tespit edildi. Tart flma: Ön segment morfolojisi, göz içi basıncı ve oküler nabız basıncı yaşla birlikte değişir ve primer açık açılı glokom tanısının b

🔖

Cite This Article

BEDEN, Ü., SÖNMEZ, B., ÖZARSLAN, M., YETER, V., KURUOĞLU, S., CÖMERT, E., ÖGE, İ. (2022). The ınvolutional change of the anterior segment morphology, ıntraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude and the effect of glaucoma on this change. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1, 27–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/638142

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Ferrer-Blasco T, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Montes-Mico R. Age-related chan- ge in the human visual system and prevalence of refractive conditions in patients attending an eye clinic. J Catarct Refract Surg. 2008;34:424–32. Maden A: Aponörotik ptosis. Oküloplastik cerrahi. 1995: 199-200. Collin JRO: A manual of systematic eyelid surgery. Churchill Livingstone, 1989: 8-44. Maden A: İnvolüsyonel ektropion Oküloplastik cerrahi. 1995: 163-4. Maden A: Aponörotik ptosis. Oküloplastik cerrahi. 1995: 199-200. Zilelioğlu O: Entropion, Ektropion. Hasanreisoğlu B, Kural G. Duman S (Ed). Lakrimal sistem hastalıkları ve oküloplastik cerrahi.1991:113-9. Van Haeringen NJ: Aging and the lacrimal system. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81:824-6. American Academy of Ophfhalmology. Basic and clinical science coursExternal discase and cornea. I999-2000:337-8.
  2. Toris CB, Yablonski ME, Wang YL. Camras CB. Aqueous HumoDynamics in the Aging Human Eye. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127:407-12
  3. Hoffmann EM, Grus FH, Pfeiffer N. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulsamplitude using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometryBMC Ophthalmol. 2004; 4:4. Langham ME, To’Mey KF. A clinical procedure for the measurements of thocular pulse pressure relationship and ophthalmic arterial pressure. Exp EyRes. 1978;27:17-25.
  4. Silver DM, Farrell RA. Validity of pulsatile ocular blood flow measurements. Surv Ophthalmol. 1994;38:72-80.
  5. Franklin SS, Gustin W, Wong ND, et al. Hemodynamic patterns of agerelated changes in blood pressure. The Framingham Heart StudyCirculation 1997;96:308- 15. Ravalico G, Toffoli G, Pastori G, Crocè M, Calderini S. Age-related oculablood flow changes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:2645- 9. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Robert YC, Thiel MA. Ocular pulse amplitude in healthy subjects as measured by dynamic contour tonometry. ArcOphthalmol. 2006;124: l104-8. Lachkar Y. I have tested for you. The contour tonometer. IOP analysiusing. Dynamic Contour Tonometry. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2006;29:32-5.
  6. Langham ME, Grebe R, Hopkins M, Marcus S, Sebag M. Choroidal blood flow in diabetic retinopathy. Exp Eye Res. 1991;52:167-73.
  7. Karl-Georg Schmidt, Andrea von Rückmann, Bettina Kemkes-MatthesHans-Peter Hammes. Ocular pulse amplitude in diabetes mellitus. Br Ophthalmol. 2000;84:1282–4. Gayer O, Neudorfer M, Snir T, et al. Pulsatile ocular blood flow in diabetiretinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999;77:522-5.
  8. Remzi Karadağ, Mehmet Kanbay. The Effect of Controlled SystemiHypertension with Treatment on Intraocular