Journals / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4

Evaluationofposteriorvitreous detachment after microcoaxial cataract surgery

Mikrokoaksiyel katarakt cerrahisinde arka vitreus dekolmanının değerlendirilmesi

Pages
288–292
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The presence of PVD in the phakic fellow eye should be considered for the occurrence of PVD due to surgery. (Turk J Ophthalmol 2014; 44: 288-92)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: To evaluate the posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) after microcoaxial cataract surgery by considering presence or absence of PVD in the phakic fellow eye.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, we evaluated 40 eyes without PVD of 40 patients aged between 59 and 70 years who were bilateral phakic and were scheduled for surgery.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The presence of PVD in the phakic fellow eye should be considered for the occurrence of PVD due to surgery. (Turk J Ophthalmol 2014; 44: 288-92)
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) after microcoaxial cataract surgery by considering presence or absence of PVD in the phakic fellow eye. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, we evaluated 40 eyes without PVD of 40 patients aged between 59 and 70 years who were bilateral phakic and were scheduled for surgery. The patients were assigned to 1 of 2 groups according to presence or absence of PVD in the phakic fellow eye. Group 1 consisted of 14 patients with spontaneous PVD in the phakic fellow-eye; group 2 consisted of 26 patients without spontaneous PVD in the phakic fellow eye. The groups were compared in terms of occurrence of PVD after cataract surgery. The PVD was evaluated before cataract surgery and at first and third months after surgery. Results: There was no statistical difference in age, sex, manifest refraction, axial length, mean phaco time, and mean effective phaco time between the groups (p>0.05). While new-onset PVD was detected in 8 eyes at first month and in 2 eyes at third month in group 1, it was in 6 eyes at first month and in 2 eyes at third month in group 2. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p=0.043 for first month; p=0.028 for third month). Conclusion: Even though size of incision has been reduced in cataract surgery, the occurrence of PVD is a potential complication. The presence of PVD in the phakic fellow eye should be considered for the occurrence of PVD due to surgery. (Turk J Ophthalmol 2014; 44: 288-92)

Özet

Amaç: Mikrokoaksiyel katarakt cerrahisi sonrası gelişen arka vitreus dekolmanının (AVD) diğer gözdeki AVD mevcudiyeti dikkate alınarak değerlendirilmesi. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu prospektif çalışmada yaşları 59 ile 70 arasında değişen, bilateral fakik olan ve cerrahi planlanan gözünde AVD olmayan 40 hastanın 40 gözü değerlendirildi. Olgular diğer fakik gözde spontan AVD mevcudiyetine göre gruplandırıldı. Grup 1, diğer fakik gözde spontan AVDsi olan 14 olgudan; grup 2 diğer fakik gözde AVDsi olmayan 26 olgudan oluştu. Gruplar cerrahi yapılan gözde AVD gelişimi açısından karşılaştırıldı. AVD mevcudiyeti katarakt cerrahisi öncesinde ve sonrası 1. ve 3. aylarda değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Gruplar arasında yaş, cinsiyet, refraksiyon derecesi, aksiyel uzunluk, ortalama fako zamanı ve ortalama etkili fako zamanı açısından fark bulunmadı (p>0,05). Grup 1de cerrahi sonrası 1. ayda 8 gözde; 3. ayda 2 gözde yeni AVD tespit edilirken, grup 2de 1. ayda 6; 3. ayda 2 gözde yeni AVD tespit edildi. Gruplar arasındaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu (1. ay p=0,043; 3. ay p=0.028). Sonuç: Katarakt cerrahisinde küçük kesiye rağmen AVD gelişimi kaçınılmaz olabilir. Diğer fakik gözde spontan gelişen AVD cerrahiye bağlı AVD gelişiminde dikkate alınmalıdır. (Turk J Ophthalmol 2014; 44: 288-92)

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZYOL, P., ÖZYOL, E., DOĞANAY, B. E. (2022). Evaluationofposteriorvitreous detachment after microcoaxial cataract surgery. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4, 288–292. https://ajindex.com/articles/638053

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Tuft SJ, Minassian D, Sullivan P. Risk factors for retinal detachment after cataract surgery:a case-control study. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:650-6.
  2. Lois N, Wong D. Pseudophakic retinal detachment. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003;48:467-87.
  3. Sheu SJ, Ger LP, Chen JF. Male sex as a risk factor for pseudophakic retinal detachment after cataract extraction in Taiwanese adults. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1898-903.
  4. Bhagwandien AC, Cheng YY, Wolfs RC, van Meurs JC, Luyten GP. Relationship between retinal detachment and biometry in 4262 cataractous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:643-9.
  5. Erie JC, Raecker ME, Baratz KH, Schleck CD, Robertson DM. Risk of retinal detachment after cataract extraction, 1980-2004: a population-based study. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2006;104:167-75.
  6. Russell M, Gaskin B, Russell D, Polkinghorne PJ. Pseudophakic retinal detachment after phacoemulsification cataract surgery: Ten-year retrospective review. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:442-5.
  7. Ripandelli G, Coppe AM, Parisi V, et al. Posterior vitreous detachment and retinal detachment after cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:692-7.
  8. Hayreh SS, Jonas JB. Posterior vitreous detachment: clinical correlations. Ophthalmologica. 2004;218:333-43.
  9. Hilford D, Hilford M, Mathew A, Polkinghorne PJ. Posterior vitreous detachment following cataract surgery. Eye(Lond). 2009;23:1388-92.
  10. Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. The lens opacities classification system III. The longitudinal study of cataract group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:831-6. Günalp İ. Retina Dekolmanı ve tedavisi. MN Oftalmoloji. 1994;2:109-31.
  11. Satıcı A, Güzey M. Miyoplarda arka vitreus dekolmanı prevalansı ve yaş ile ilişkisi. Ret-Vit. 1997;5:121-4. Johnson MW. Posterior vitreous detachment:Evolution and complications of its early stages. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;14:371-82. Kadayıfçılar S. Yaşlanan vitreus. Ret-Vit. 2011;19:221-24.
  12. Bardak Y, Sönmez K, Özertürk Y. Posterior vitreus dekolman tipleri ve oküler patolojiler ile ilişkileri. T. Oft. Gaz. 2001;31:104-9. Özertürk Y. Ön segment cerrahisinde retinal komplikasyonlar ve tedavisi. Ret-Vit. 2000;8:115-21.
  13. Atmaca-Sönmez P, Atmaca LS, Özyol E. Ön segment cerrahisi sonrası kistoid makula ödemi. Ret-Vit. 2007;15:71-5.
  14. Bardak Y, Özkaya D, Çekiç O, Tığ UŞ. Fakoemülsifikasyon sırasında kapsül bütünlüğü bozulan olgularda sulkus ve kapsül içi yerleşimli göz içi lens uygulamalarının karşılaştırılması. Glo-Kat. 2006;1:39-42.
  15. Mirshahi A, Hoehn F, Lorenz K, Hattenbach LO. Incidence of posterior vitreous de