Journals / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of the changes in anterior segment morphology after laser peripheral ıridotomy through one-year follow-up

Laser periferik iridotomi sonrası bir yıllık takip sürecinde ön segment morfolojisindeki değişikliklerin değerlendirilmesi

Pages
6–10
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

AACA, CACD, and ACV measurements showed significant difference between baseline and months 1.3, 6, and 12 in all groups (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: To evaluate the long-term changes in anterior segment morphology after laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) in eyes with primary angle-closure suspect (PACS), primary angle closure (PAC), and primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) using Scheimpflug camera (SC).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Fifty-six eyes of 30 patients diagnosed as PACS, PAC, and PACG were included prospectively in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:AACA, CACD, and ACV measurements showed significant difference between baseline and months 1.3, 6, and 12 in all groups (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the long-term changes in anterior segment morphology after laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) in eyes with primary angle-closure suspect (PACS), primary angle closure (PAC), and primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) using Scheimpflug camera (SC). Materials and Methods: Fifty-six eyes of 30 patients diagnosed as PACS, PAC, and PACG were included prospectively in this study. In addition to full ophthalmic examination and intraocular pressure (IOP) assessment, anterior-posterior length (AxL) values of the eyes were recorded. With use of SC, average anterior chamber angle (AACA), central anterior chamber depth (CACD), and anterior chamber volume (ACV) were documented preoperatively and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after LPI. The results have been evaluated statistically. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of mean age, gender, and AxL (p>0.05). AACA, CACD, and ACV measurements showed significant difference between baseline and months 1.3, 6, and 12 in all groups (p

Özet

Özet Amaç: Primer açı kapanması şüphesi (PAKŞ), primer açı kapanması (PAK) ve primer açı kapanması glokomu (PAKG) tanısıyla laser periferik iridotomi (LPİ) yapılan gözlerde ön segment morfolojisinde meydana gelen uzun süreli değişikliklerin Scheimpflug kamera (SK) ile değerlendirilmesi. Gereç ve Yöntem: PAKŞ, PAK ve PAKG tanısı alan 30 hastanın 50 gözü prospektif olarak çalışmaya alındı. Tüm olguların tam oftalmik muayene ve göz içi basıncı (GİB) ölçümüne ek olarak gözlerin ön-arka uzunluğu (AU) kaydedildi. LPİ öncesi ve LPİ sonrası 1. ay, 3. ay, 6. ay, 12. ay kontrollerinde SK ile ortalama ön kamara açısı (OÖKA), santral ön kamara derinliği (SÖKD) ve ön kamara hacmi (ÖKH) ölçüldü. Sonuçlar istatistiksel olarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Gruplar arasında yaş ortalamaları, cinsiyet ve (AU) bakımından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark saptanmadı (p>0,05). OÖKA, SÖKD ve ÖKH ölçümleri tüm gruplarda başlangıç ile 1., 3., 6., 12. aylar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı azalma gösterdi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ACER, Y., ONUR, U., AĞAÇHAN, A., YİĞİT, U. (2022). Evaluation of the changes in anterior segment morphology after laser peripheral ıridotomy through one-year follow-up. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 1, 6–10. https://ajindex.com/articles/638041

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Quigley HA, Broman A. The number of people with glaucoma world-wide i2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:262-7.
  2. Fea AM, Bertaina L, Consolandi G, Damato D, Lorenzi U, Grignolo FMAngle Closure Glaucoma: Pathogenesis and Evaluation. A Review. J CliniExperiment Ophthalmol. 2012;S4:1-17.
  3. Suzuki Y, Yamamoto T, Araie M, et al. Tajimi Study Review. Nihon GankGakkai Zasshi 2008;112:1039-58.
  4. Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition anclassification of glaucoma in prevalance surveys. Br J Ophthalmo2002;86:238-42.
  5. He M, Friedman DS, Ge J, et al. Laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angel- closure suspects: Biometric and gonioscopic outcomes: The Liwan Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:494-500.
  6. Bekir N, Güngör K. Primer Açı Kapanması Glokomu. Tamçelik N,ed. Glokom. Türk Oftalmoloji Derneği Eğitim Yayınları no: 9 (1. Baskı). İstanbul; Epsilon Yayıncılık, 2009:355-67.
  7. Khor WB, Sakata ML, Friedman DS, et al. Evaluation of Scanning Protocols For Imaging The Anterior Chamber Angle With Anterior Segment- Optical Coherence Tomography. J Glaucoma. 2010;19:365-68.
  8. Milla M, Pinero DP, Amparo F, Alio JL. Pachymetric measurements with a new Scheimpflug photography-based system. Intraobserver repeatability and agreement with optical coherence tomography pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:310-6.
  9. Jorge J, Rosado JL, Diaz-Rey, Gonzalez-Meijome JM. Central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth measurement by Sirius Scheimpflug tomography and ultrasound. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:417-22. López-Caballero C, Puerto-Hernández B, Muñoz-Negrete FJ, et al. Quantitative evaluation of anterior chamber changes after iridotomy using Pentacam anterior segment analyzer. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2010;20:327-32.
  10. Yao BQ, Wu LL, Zhang C, Wang X. Ultrasound Biomicroscopic Features Associated With Angle Closure in Fellow Eyes of Acute Primary Angle Closure After Laser Iridotomy. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:444-8.
  11. Tamçelik N, Atalay E, Özkök A, Cicik E. Primer Açı Kapanması Glokomunun Medikal ve Cerrahi Tedavisi. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2012;42 Özel Sayı:1-7.
  12. Dinç UA, Görgün E, Oncel B, Yenerel MN, Alimgil L. Assessment of anterior chamber depth using Visante optical coherence tomography, slitlamp optical coherence tomography, IOL Master, Pentacam and Orbscan llz. Ophthalmologica. 2010;224:341-6.
  13. Pakravan M, Sharifipour F, Yazdani S, Koohestani N, Yaseri M. Scheimpflug imaging criteria for identifying eyes at high risk of acute angle closure. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2012;7:111-7.