SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 1

Ocular biometryandcornea biomechanics in hypermetropic anisometropia

Hipermetropikanizometropide oküler biyomekaniği ve kornea biyometri

Ebru AYGIT DEMET
Zeynep ALKAN
Ahmet DEMİROK
Birsen GÖKYİĞİT
Hülya GÜNGEL
Pages
23–26
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Mean spherical equivalent was +5.42±1.8 D and +1.9±1.28 D in group 1 and group 2, respectively (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: To evaluate ocular biometric parameters including anterior chamber depth (ACD), corneal curvature (CC), central corneal thickness (CCT), horizontal corneal diameter, and corneal biomechanical properties using ocular response analyzer (ORA) in eyes with hypermetropic anisometropia and to compare the results with those obtained for the healthy eyes of the patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Sixty-four eyes of 32 patients followed with the diagnosis of hypermetropic anisometropia-related ambliyopia were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Mean spherical equivalent was +5.42±1.8 D and +1.9±1.28 D in group 1 and group 2, respectively (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate ocular biometric parameters including anterior chamber depth (ACD), corneal curvature (CC), central corneal thickness (CCT), horizontal corneal diameter, and corneal biomechanical properties using ocular response analyzer (ORA) in eyes with hypermetropic anisometropia and to compare the results with those obtained for the healthy eyes of the patients. Materials and Methods: Sixty-four eyes of 32 patients followed with the diagnosis of hypermetropic anisometropia-related ambliyopia were included in the study. Group 1 (n=32) consisted of eyes with hypermetropic anisometropia, and group 2 (n=32) consisted of healthy eyes of the same patients. Cycloplegic refraction, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal topography, axial length (AL) measurement, biomicroscopy, and fundus examinations were performed. Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), and Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg) measurements were recorded. Results: Mean age of the patients was 9.5±2.4; 13 were male and 19 were female. Mean spherical equivalent was +5.42±1.8 D and +1.9±1.28 D in group 1 and group 2, respectively (p

Özet

Amaç: Hipermetropik anizometropik gözlerde, ön kamara derinliği (ÖKD), kornea eğriliği (KE), merkezi kornea kalınlığı (MKK), horizontal kornea çapını içeren oküler biyometrik parametreleri ve Oküler Cevap Analizöru (OCA) ile ölçülen korneanın biyomekanik özelliklerini değerlendirmek ve aynı hastaların sağlam gözleri ile karşılaştırmak. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya hipermetropik anizometropiye bağli ambliyopi tanısı ile takip edilen 32 olgunun 64 gözü dahil edildi. Hipermetropik anizometropisi olan gözler grup 1 (n=32), aynı hastaların sağlam gözleri ise grup 2yi (n=32) oluşturdu. Sikloplejili refraksiyon değerleri, düzeltilmiş en iyi görme keskinliği (DEGK), kornea topografisi, aksiyel uzunluk (AU) ölçümü, biyomikroskopi ve fundus muayeneleri yapıldı. Kornea histerezisi (KH), kornea direnç faktörü (KDF) ve kornea düzeltmeli göz içi basıncı (GİBg) değerleri kaydedildi. Bulgular: Hastaların yaş ortalaması 9,5±2,4 yıl ve 13ü erkek, 19u kız idi. Ortalama sferik ekivalan grup 1 ve grup 2de sırasıyla +5,42±1,8 D ve +1,9±1,28 D idi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMET, E. A., ALKAN, Z., DEMİROK, A., GÖKYİĞİT, B., GÜNGEL, H. (2022). Ocular biometryandcornea biomechanics in hypermetropic anisometropia. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 1, 23–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/638032

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Chalam KV, Ambati BK, Beaver HA, et al. Part VIII. Chapter 1. External Disease and Cornea. In: Skuta GL, Cantor LB, Weiss JS, eds. American Academy of Ophthalmology. San Francisco, CA, American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2010:3-9. Gloster J. Tonometry and tomography. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1965;5:911- 1133. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:146-55.
  2. Lim L, Gazzard G, Chan YH et al. Cornea biomechanical characteristics and their correlates with refractive error in Singaporean children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:3852-7.
  3. Huang Y, Huang C, Li L, et al. Corneal biomechanics, refractive error, and axial length in Chinese primary school children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:4923-8.
  4. Cass K, Tromans C. A biometric investigation of ocular components in amblyopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008;28:429-40.
  5. Loudot C, Zanin E, Fogliarini C, Boulze M, Souchon L, Denis D. [Ocular biometry in children with hypermetropia: utility of the Lenstar LS 900 optical biometer (Haag-Streit(®))]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2011;34:369-75.
  6. Touzeau O, Allouch C, Borderie V, Kopito R, Laroche L. [Correlation between refraction and ocular biometry.] J Fr Ophtalmol. 2003;26:355-63.
  7. Kutschke PJ, Scott WE, Keech RV. Anisometropic amblyopia Ophthalmology. 1991;98:258-63. Zaka-Ur-Rab S. Evaluation of relationship of ocular parameters and depth of anisometropic amblyopia with the degree of anisometropia. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2006;54:99-103.
  8. Kirwan C, O’Keefe M, Lanigan B. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocular response analyzer. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:990-2.
  9. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Mantry S, Cunliffe I Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:3026-31.
  10. Radhakrisman H, Miranda MA, O’Donnell C. Corneal biomechanical properties and their correlates with refractive error. Clin Exp Optom. 2012;95:12-8.
  11. Plakitsi A, O’Donnell C, Miranda MA, Charman WN, Radhakrishnan H. Corneal biomechanical properties measured with the Ocular Response Analyser in a myopic population. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011;31:404-12.