Journals / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2

Orbital dermis-fat graft transplantation: Results in primary and secondary ımplantation

Orbitaldermis yağ greft implantasyonu: Primer ve sekonder implant sonuçları

Pages
65–70
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In secondary cases, correct patient selection is important to achieve good outcome. (Turk J Ophthalmol 2015; 45: 65-70)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Autologous dermis fat graft (DFG) is being used in both primary and secondary socket surgeries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ma­te­ri­als and Met­hods: In this retrospective study, the results of 17 patients who were operated between October 2008 and October 2012 were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In secondary cases, correct patient selection is important to achieve good outcome. (Turk J Ophthalmol 2015; 45: 65-70)
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Autologous dermis fat graft (DFG) is being used in both primary and secondary socket surgeries. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate patients satisfaction and possible intra- and postoperative complications in patients who had DFG transplantation. Ma­te­ri­als and Met­hods: In this retrospective study, the results of 17 patients who were operated between October 2008 and October 2012 were evaluated. Of these cases, 7 had primary and 10 had secondary DFG. Patient satisfaction was evaluated by asking the patients to fill out a questionnaire graded from 1 (not satisfied) to 4 (very satisfied). Additionally, the incidence of complications and requirement for another operation was noted. Re­sults: The average patient age was 30.5±17.9 years. Patients with primary grafts were 100% satisfied with the outcome and could wear their prosthesis without any discomfort. In this group, one patient had delay in epithelialisation of the graft and ptosis, which was treated with frontal sling surgery and artificial tears. In patients with secondary grafts, 6 patients (60%) were satisfied with the outcome. Four patients were not satisfied from the result. One had inferior lid laxity; however, after lateral tarsal strip surgery, she could wear her prosthesis. Another patient developed inferior forniceal adhesion. He was treated with mucous membrane grafting and artificial tears and could wear his prosthesis. One patient had infection and contraction of the socket due to inappropriate postoperative medication use. Following repeated DFG transplantation, he was able to wear his prosthesis. Another patient had fat atrophy prior to secondary DFG transplantation and developed atrophy of the graft following surgery. Her family refused additional surgery. This patient could not wear any prosthesis. Conclusion: According to our results, we believe that DFG transplantation is successful in primary implantation. In secondary cases, correct patient selection is important to achieve good outcome. (Turk J Ophthalmol 2015; 45: 65-70)

Özet

Amaç: Otolog dermis-yağ grefti (DYG) primer ve sekonder soket cerrahilerinde kullanılmaktadır. Biz bu çalışmamızda DYG implantasyonu geçirmiş olguları, hasta memnuniyeti ve cerrahi sırası ve sonrasındaki komplikasyonlar açısından değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Ge­reç ve Yön­tem: Retrospektif planlanan çalışmamızda Ekim 2008 ile Ekim 2012 arasında opere olan 17 olgu incelendi. Bunlardan 7 olguya primer, 10 olguya sekonder DYG implante edilmişti. Hastaların memnuniyeti bir sorgulama formunda derecesi 1 (memnuniyetsiz) ile 4 (çok memnun) arasında bir değeri seçmesi istenerek değerlendirildi. Ayrıca komplikasyonlar, sıklıkları ve farklı bir cerrahi ihtiyaçları not edildi. Bulgular: Olguların yaş ortalaması 30,5±17,9 yıl idi. Primer DYG implante edilmiş olguların memnuniyeti %100 düzeyindeydi ve protezlerini bir rahatsızlık olmadan kullanıyorlardı. Bu grupta sadece bir hastada epitelizasyonda gecikme ve pitozis gelişmişti ve tedavisinde için frontal askılı pitoz cerrahisi uygulanmış ve beraberinde suni gözyaşları kullanılmıştı. Sekonder DYG uygulanmış olgularda 6 hasta (%60) sonuçtan memnundu. Memnun olmayan 4 olgudan birinde alt kapak laksisitesi gelişmişti, lateral tarsal şerit cerrahisi ile olgu protezini rahat kullanabilmişti. Bir diğer hastada alt fornikste yapışıklık gelişmişti. Hastaya müköz membran grafti ve suni göz yaşı tedavisi uygulanması sonrasında protezini kullanabildi. Bir olguda cerrahi sonrasında ilaçların uygun olmayan şekilde kullanımı sebebi ile enfeksiyon ve sokette kontraksiyon gelişti. Tekrar DYG sonrası hasta protezini takabildi. Bir diğer hastada sekonder DYG implantasyonu öncesinde orbitada yağ atrofisi vardı ve cerrahiden sonra da greft atrofisi gelişti. Hastanın ailesi başka bir müdahaleyi kabul etmedi. Bu hasta protez kullanamadı. Sonuç: Çalışmamızın sonuçlarına göre DYG transplantasyonunun primer olgularda başarıyla uygulanabildiği düşüncesindeyiz. Sekonder olgularda, başarılı sonuçlar elde etmek için hasta seçiminin iyi yapılması önem taşımaktadır. (Turk J Ophthalmol 2015; 45:

🔖

Cite This Article

CANAN, H., ÇOBAN, M. K., ALTAN, R. Y. (2022). Orbital dermis-fat graft transplantation: Results in primary and secondary ımplantation. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2, 65–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/637993

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Soll DB. Management of the anophthalmic socket and techniques of enucleation, evisceration and exentration:surgical procedures and management of complications. In Duane TD (ed): Duane’s Clinical Ophthalmology, Vol 5 Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 1992, pp. 407-423
  2. Soll DB. The anophthalmic socket. Ophthalmology. 1982;85:205-208
  3. McCord CD. The extruding implant. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1976;81:587-590
  4. Dryden R, Leibson J. Postenucleation orbital implant extrusion. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978;96:2064-2065
  5. Quaranta-Leoni FM, Moretti C, Sposato S, Nardoni S, Lambiase A, Bonini S. Management of porous orbital implants requiring explantation: a clinical and histopathological study. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;30:132-136
  6. McElnea EM, Ryan A, Fulcher T. Porous orbital implant exposure: the influence of surgical technique. Orbit. 2014;33:104-108
  7. Custer PL, Trinkaus KM. Porous implant exposure: Incidence, management, and morbidity. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;23:1-7
  8. Hintschich CR, Beyer-Machule CK. Dermis fatty tissue transplant as primary and secondary orbital implant. Complications and results. Ophthalmologe. 1996;93:617-622
  9. Smith B, Bosniak SL, Lisman RD. An autogenous kinetic dermis-fat orbital implant:An updated technique. Ophthalmology. 1982;89:1067-1071
  10. Shore JW, Burks R, Leone CR Jr, McCord CD Jr. Dermis-fat graft for orbital reconstruction after subtotal exentration. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;102:228- 236
  11. Guberina C, Hornblass A, Meltzer MA, Soarez V, Smith B. Autogenous dermis-fat orbital implantation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;101:1586-1590
  12. Bosniak SL. Reconstruction of the anophthalmic socket:state of the art. Adv Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;7:313-348
  13. Nentwich MM, Schebitz-Walter K, Hirneiss C, Hintschich C. Dermis Fat Grafts as Primary and Secondary Orbital Implants. Orbit. 2014;33:33-38
  14. Smith B, Bosniak S, Nesi F, Lisman R. Dermis-fat orbital implantation:118 cases. Ophthalmic Surg. 1983;14:941-943
  15. Shore JW, McCord CD Jr, Bergin DJ, Dittmar SJ, Maiorca JP, Burks WR. Management of complications following dermis-fat grafting for anophthalmic socket reconstruction. Ophthalmology. 1985;92:1342-1350
  16. Aguilar GL, Shannon GM, Flanagan JC. Experience with dermis-fat grafting:an analysis of early postoperative complications and methods of prevention. Ophthalmic Surg. 1982;13:204-209
  17. Amornvit P, Rokaya D, Shrestha B, Srithavaj T. Prosthetic rehabilitation o