SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3

Does Cataract Surgery Simulation Correlate with Real-life Experience?

Bengü EKİNCİ KÖKTEKİR
Süleyman OKUDAN
Ayşe Bozkurt OFLAZ
Pages
122–126
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The increase inperformance upon repeated practice indicates that the simulator supports surgical training.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: To evaluate the correlation of cataract surgical simulator and real-life surgical experience and its contribution to surgicaltraining.Materials and Methods: Sixteen doctors in our department were divided into three groups based on their surgical experience.After being familiarized with the device, the participants were evaluated while performing the navigation, forceps, bimanual practice,anti-tremor and capsulorhexis stages.
📊
Key Findings & Data:P values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant.Results: There was correlation between the participants’ surgical experience and their scores in the capsulorhexis module.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The increase inperformance upon repeated practice indicates that the simulator supports surgical training.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the correlation of cataract surgical simulator and real-life surgical experience and its contribution to surgicaltraining.Materials and Methods: Sixteen doctors in our department were divided into three groups based on their surgical experience.After being familiarized with the device, the participants were evaluated while performing the navigation, forceps, bimanual practice,anti-tremor and capsulorhexis stages. The capsulorhexis stage was repeated five times. Participants were also assessed while performingcapsulorhexis again with their non-dominant hand. The influence of repetition and surgical experience on the recorded points wasevaluated. P values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant.Results: There was correlation between the participants’ surgical experience and their scores in the capsulorhexis module. Theirdominant hand was more successful than the non-dominant hand in capsulorhexis (p=0.004). Capsulorhexis scores increased withrepetition (p=0.001).Conclusion: Results achieved with the cataract surgery simulation device correlate with surgical experience. The increase inperformance upon repeated practice indicates that the simulator supports surgical training.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖKTEKİR, B. E., OKUDAN, S., OFLAZ, A. B. (2022). Does Cataract Surgery Simulation Correlate with Real-life Experience?. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3, 122–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/637807

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Pointdujour R, Ahmad H, Liu M, Smith E, Lazzaro D. b-blockade affects simulator scores. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:1893. Park J, Williams O, Waqar S, Modi N, Kersey T, Sleep T. Safety of nondominanthand ophthalmic surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:2112-2116.
  2. Park J, Waqar S, Kersey T, Modi N, Ong C, Sleep T. Effect of distraction on simulated anterior segment surgical performance. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:1517-1522.
  3. Waqar S, Williams O, Park J, Modi N, Kersey T, Sleep T. Can virtual reality simulation help to determine the importance of stereopsis in intraocular surgery? Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:742-746.
  4. Waqar S, Park J, Kersey TL, Modi N, Ong C, Sleep TJ. Assessment of fatigue in intraocular surgery: analysis using a virtual reality simulator. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;249:77-81.
  5. Sachdeva R, Traboulsi EI. Performance of patients with deficient stereoacuity on the EYESi microsurgical simulator. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151:427- 433. Saleh GM, Lamparter J, Sullivan PM, O’Sullivan F, Hussain B, Athanasiadis I, Litwin AS, Gillan SN. The international forum of ophthalmic simulation: developing a virtual reality training curriculum for ophthalmology. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97:789-792.
  6. Pokroy R, Du E, Alzaga A, Khodadadeh S, Steen D, Bachynski B, Edwards P. Impact of simulator training on resident cataract surgery. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251:777-781.
  7. Belyea DA, Brown, SE, Rajjoub LZ. Influence of surgery simulator training on ophthalmology resident phacoemulsification performance. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;1756-1761.
  8. Dooley IJ, O’Brien PD. Subjective difficulty of each stage of phacoemulsification cataract surgery performed by basic surgical trainees. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:604-608.
  9. Bergqvist J, Person A, Vestergaard A, Grauslund J. Establishment of a validated training programme on the Eyesi cataract simulator. A prospective randomized study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92:629-634.
  10. Feudner EM, Engel C, Neuhann IM, Petermeier K, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Szurman P. Virtual reality training improves wet-lab performance of capsulorhexis: results of a randomized, controlled study. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;247:955-963.
  11. Thomsen AS, Kiilgaard JF, Kjærbo H, la Cour M, Konge L. Simulation-based certification for cataract surgery. Acta ophthalmol. 2015;93:416-421.
  12. Privett B, Greenlee E, Rogers G, Oetting TA. Construct validity of a surgical simulator as a valid model for capsulorhexis training. J Cataract Refract Surg