Journals / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1

Direct Treatment Costs of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration and Comparison of Gained and/or Preserved Vision with Expenditure

Pages
27–32
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The cost of one line of VA gain was 11,911 TL in the first year.Conclusion: This study showed that treatment increased or stabilized vision in a reasonable proportion of patients, that cost ofmanagement decreases in the second year, and that drug expenses are the leading item in reimbursement.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim was to quantify the direct medical cost of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) versus gained orpreserved vision.Materials and Methods: Data of patients treated for neovascular AMD between January 2009 to January 2014 were reviewed.Patients with complete follow-up for two years, treated with only intravitreal ranibizumab injections and with no intraocular surgerywere included.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Total cost was calculated for the first and second years, and the cost of improving or preservinginitial vision level was determined with subgroup analysis.Results: Two-hundred eyes of 175 patients (86 male and 89 female) with a mean age of 72.3±7.8 years were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The cost of one line of VA gain was 11,911 TL in the first year.Conclusion: This study showed that treatment increased or stabilized vision in a reasonable proportion of patients, that cost ofmanagement decreases in the second year, and that drug expenses are the leading item in reimbursement.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim was to quantify the direct medical cost of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) versus gained orpreserved vision.Materials and Methods: Data of patients treated for neovascular AMD between January 2009 to January 2014 were reviewed.Patients with complete follow-up for two years, treated with only intravitreal ranibizumab injections and with no intraocular surgerywere included. Demographics, diagnostic investigations, the number of visits and injections, changes in visual acuity (VA) at one yearand two years from baseline were noted. Total cost was calculated for the first and second years, and the cost of improving or preservinginitial vision level was determined with subgroup analysis.Results: Two-hundred eyes of 175 patients (86 male and 89 female) with a mean age of 72.3±7.8 years were included. Mean VA was0.67 logMAR at baseline, 0.60 logMAR at the end of the first year, and 0.67 logMAR at the end of the second year. At the end of the 2years, VA increased in 82 eyes (41%), remained the same in 42 eyes (21%), and decreased in 76 eyes (38%). The mean number of visitsin the first and second years were 6.56 (3-12) and 5.74 (3-10), respectively. An average of 4.42 (1-8) injections were performed in thefirst year and 2.25 (0-7) in the second. The total direct medical cost for AMD was 9,628 TL (Turkish Lira) per patient for 2 years, whichconsisted of 529 TL in visit costs, 115 TL in fluorescein and indocyanine angiography costs, 611 TL in injection procedure costs, and8,371 TL in drug costs. The cost of one line of VA gain was 11,911 TL in the first year.Conclusion: This study showed that treatment increased or stabilized vision in a reasonable proportion of patients, that cost ofmanagement decreases in the second year, and that drug expenses are the leading item in reimbursement.

🔖

Cite This Article

AFRASHİ, F., AKKIN, C., MENTEŞ, J., NALÇACI, S., ÖZTAŞ, Z., YILDIRIM, Ş. (2022). Direct Treatment Costs of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration and Comparison of Gained and/or Preserved Vision with Expenditure. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1, 27–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/637769

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Schmier JK, Halpern MT, Covert D, Delgado J, Sharma S. Impact of visual impairment on use of caregiving by individuals with age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2006;26:1056-1062.
  2. Schwartz SD, Hubschman JP, Heilwell G, Franco-Cardenas V, Pan CK, Ostrick RM, Mickunas E, Gay R, Klimanskaya I, Lanza R. Embryonic stem cell trials for macular degeneration: a preliminary report. Lancet. 2012;379:713-720.
  3. Zhang K, Hopkins JJ, Heier JS, Birch DG, Halperin LS, Albini TA, Brown DM, Jaffe GJ, Tao W, Williams GA. Ciliary neurotrophic factor delivered by encapsulated cell intraocular implants for treatment of geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:6241- 6245. Kubota R, Boman NL, David R, Mallikaarjun S, Patil S, Birch D. Safety and effect on rod function of ACU-4429, a novel small-molecule visual cycle modulator. Retina. 2012;32:183-188.
  4. Tarallo V, Hirano Y, Gelfand BD, Dridi S, Kerur N, Kim Y, Cho WG, Kaneko H, Fowler BJ, Bogdanovich S, Albuquerque RJ, Hauswirth WW, Chiodo VA, Kugel JF, Goodrich JA, Ponicsan SL, Chaudhuri G, Murphy MP, Dunaief JL, Ambati BK, Ogura Y, Yoo JW, Lee DK, Provost P, Hinton DR, Núñez G, Baffi JZ, Kleinman ME, Ambati J. DICER1 loss and Alu RNA induce agerelated macular degeneration via the NLRP3 inflammasome and MyD88. Cell. 2012;149:847-859. Regillo CD. Lampalizumab (anti-factor D) in patients with geography atrophy: The mahalo phase 2 results; Proceedings of the 2013 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology 2013. New Orleans; LA, USA; 2013:16-19.
  5. Ying GS, Maguire MG, Daniel E, Ferris FL, Jaffe GJ, Grunwald JE, Toth CA, Huang J, Martin DF; Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT) Research Group. Association of Baseline Characteristics and Early Vision Response with 2-Year Vision Outcomes in the Comparison of AMD Treatments Trials (CATT). Ophthalmology. 2015;122:2523-2531.
  6. Holz FG, Bandello F, Gillies M, Mitchell P, Osborne A, Sheidow T, Souied E, Figueroa MS; LUMINOUS Steering Committee. Safety of ranibizumab in routine clinical practice: 1-year retrospective pooled analysis of four European neovascular AMD registries within the LUMINOUS programme. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97:1161-1167.
  7. Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, Boyer DS, Kaiser PK, Chung CY, Kim RY; MARINA Study Group. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1419-1431.
  8. Brown DM, Kaiser PK, Michels M, Soubrane G, Heier JS, Kim RY, Sy JP, Sch