Journals / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 4

Short- and Long-term Results of Glaucoma Valve Implantation for Aniridiarelated Glaucoma: A Case Series and Literature Review

Aniridi Nedenli Glokomda Glokom Drenaj Valv İmplantasyonunun Kısa ve Uzun Dönem Sonuçları: Olgu Serisi ve Literatür Derlemesi

Pages
183–187
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, it should be considered as an initial surgical treatment for aniridic glaucoma; the clinician should be alert for concomitant ocular disorders

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: To report the results obtained from glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation in patients with aniridia-related glaucoma and to review the literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 6 patients who underwent GDD implantation for glaucoma secondary to congenital aniridia between April 2001 and February 2015.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, it should be considered as an initial surgical treatment for aniridic glaucoma; the clinician should be alert for concomitant ocular disorders
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: To report the results obtained from glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation in patients with aniridia-related glaucoma and to review the literature. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 6 patients who underwent GDD implantation for glaucoma secondary to congenital aniridia between April 2001 and February 2015. Data on age at surgery, gender, laterality, surgeries before GDD implantation, GDD model, concomitant ocular disorders, visual acuity, and intraocular pressure (IOP) values before and at 1 and 12 months after GDD implantation, medications, follow-up period, findings during last visit, complications, and course of disease were collected. Results: Mean age at surgery was 16.00±12.31 years (range 5-37 years). Mean IOP was 33.00±12.11 (range 22-50) mmHg just before the GDD implantation with a mean of 3.5±1.2 medications. Mean IOP 1 month after implantation was 16.33±4.22 (range 12-24) mmHg with a mean of 1.5±0.8 medications; at 12 months, mean IOP was 19.50±4.76 (range 15-26) mmHg with 3.0±0.8 medications. At the last follow-up visit, IOP was 21.16±4.07 (range 16-26) mmHg with a mean of 3.33±0.51 medications. Mean follow-up was 19.16±8.8 (range 12-36) months. Surgical success rates were 83.3%, 66.6%, and 50.0% at 1 month, 12 months, and the last visit, respectively. Conclusion: GDD implantation was effective in controlling aniridic glaucoma with a success rate of 83.3% at 1-month follow-up and 66.6% at 1-year follow-up. Therefore, it should be considered as an initial surgical treatment for aniridic glaucoma; the clinician should be alert for concomitant ocular disorders

Özet

Amaç: Glokom drenaj implantı (GDİ) takılan aniridik glokomlu hastaların sonuçlarını ve literatür derlemesini sunmaktır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Nisan 2001 ve Şubat 2015 tarihleri arasında konjenital aniridiye bağlı glokom nedenli GDİ yapılan 6 hastaretrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Cerrahi sırasındaki yaş, cinsiyet, lateralite, GDİ implantasyonu öncesi geçirilen cerrahiler, GDİmodeli, eşlik eden oküler hastalıklar, görme keskinliği, implantasyon öncesi, sonrası 1. ay ve 12. ay göz içi basıncı (GİB) değerleri,glokom ilaçları, takip süresi, son vizitteki klinik bulgular, komplikasyonlar ve hastalığın seyri veri olarak kaydedildi.Bulgular: Cerrahi sırasındaki ortalama yaş 16,00±12,31 yıl (5-37) idi. GDİ implantasyonu öncesi ortalama GİB 3,5±1,2 ilaçla,33,00±12,11 (22-50) mmHg idi. İmplantasyon sonrası 1. ve 12. ayda ortalama GİB’leri sırasıyla 1,5±0,8 ilaçla 16,33±4,22 (12-24)mmHg ve 3,0±0,8 ilaçla 19,50±4,76 (15-26) mmHg idi. Son vizitte GİB ortalama 3,33±0,51 ilaçla 21,16±4,07 (16-26) mmHg olarakbulundu. Cerrahi başarı oranı 1. ay, 12. ay ve son vizitte sırasıyla %83,3; %66,6 ve %50,0 olarak tespit edildi.Sonuç: GDİ implantasyonu postoperatif 1. ayda %83,3, ilk yıl sonunda %66,6 başarı ile aniridik glokomlu hastalarda GİB kontrolüiçin etkili bir yöntemdir ve aniridik glokomda ilk cerrahi yöntem olarak düşünülmelidir. Bunun yanında klinisyen aniridiye eşlik edendiğer oküler hastalıklar ve cerrahi sonrası gelişebilecek komplikasyonlar açısından dikkatli olmalıdır

🔖

Cite This Article

EKŞİOĞLU, Ü., ÖRNEK, F., YAKIN, M., KADERLİ, S. T., KADERLİ, A., DEMİROK, G. S. (2022). Short- and Long-term Results of Glaucoma Valve Implantation for Aniridiarelated Glaucoma: A Case Series and Literature Review. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 4, 183–187. https://ajindex.com/articles/637737

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Churchill A, Booth A. Genetics of aniridia and anterior segment dysgenesis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80:669-673
  2. Lauderdale JD, Wilensky JS, Oliver ER, Walton DS, Glaser T. 3’ deletions cause aniridia by preventing PAX6 gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:13755-13759
  3. Lee H, Khan R, O’Keefe M. Aniridia: current pathology and management. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008;86:708-715
  4. Lee H, Meyers K, Lanigan B, O’Keefe M. Complications and visual prognosis in children with aniridia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2010;47:205- 210
  5. Kokotas H, Petersen MB. Clinical and molecular aspects of aniridia. Clin Genet. 2010;77:409-420
  6. Nelson LB, Spaeth GL, Nowinski, Margo CE, Jackson L. Aniridia. A review. Surv Ophthalmol. 1984;28:621-642
  7. Wiggins RE Jr, Tomey KF. The results of glaucoma surgery in aniridia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:503-505
  8. Berlin HS, Ritch R. The treatment of glaucoma secondary to aniridia. Mt Sinai J Med. 1981;48:111-115
  9. Okada K, Mishima HK, Masumoto M, Tsumamoto Y, Tsukamoto H, Takamatsu M. Results of filtering surgery young patients with aniridia. Hiroshima J Med Sci. 2000;49:135-138 10. Chen TC, Walton DS. Goniosurgery for prevention of aniridic glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1144-1148
  10. Arroyave CP, Scott IU, Gedde SJ, Parrish RK 2nd, Feuer WJ. Use of glaucoma drainage devices in the management of glaucoma associated with aniridia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:155-159
  11. Eden U, Iggman D, Ruse R, Tornqvist K. Epidemiology of aniridia in Sweden and Norway. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008;86:727-729
  12. Grant WM, Walton DS. Progressive changes in the angle in congenital aniridia, with development of glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1974;72:207-228
  13. Wallace ER, Plager DA, Snyder SK, Raiesdana A, Helveston EM, Ellis FD. Surgical results of secondary glaucomas in childhood. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:101-111
  14. Wagle NS, Freedman SF, Buckley EG, Davis JS, Biglan AW. Long-term outcome of cyclocryotherapy for refractory pediatric glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1998;105: 1921-1926
  15. Kirwan JF, Shah P, Khaw PT. Diode laser cyclophotocoagulation:role in the management of refractory pediatric glaucomas. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:316-323
  16. Adachi M, Dickens CJ, Hetherington J Jr, Hoskins HD, Iwach AG, Wong PC, Nguyen N, Ma AS. Clinical experience of trabeculectomy for the surgical treatment of aniridic glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:2121-2125
  17. Almousa R, Lake DB. Intraocular pressure control with Ahmed glaucoma drainag