Journals / Türk Kolon ve Rektum Hastalıkları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

An Old Method Turnbull Cutait; Using for Middle and Distal Rectal Cancer Surgery without Ileostomy. Oncological and Fuctional Late Outcomes

Eski Bir Yöntem Turnbull Cutait; İleostomi Olmadan Orta ve Distal Rektal Kanser Cerrahisinde Kullanılması. Onkolojik ve Fonksiyonel Geç Sonuçlar

Pages
104–111
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Demographics, oncologic characteristics, postoperative complications, fuctional outcomes and overall survival (OS) time were evaluated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Anastomotic leak after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer may be a disaster scenario.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, Turnbull Cutait Abdominoperineal Pull-Through Procedure (T-C) with low anastomotic leakage rates is an old method that is applied without diverting ileostomy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Demographics, oncologic characteristics, postoperative complications, fuctional outcomes and overall survival (OS) time were evaluated.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Anastomotic leak after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer may be a disaster scenario. To reduce the severity of anastomotic leakage a prophylactic diverting ileostomy is usually used for mid or distal rectal cancer patients. However, Turnbull Cutait Abdominoperineal Pull-Through Procedure (T-C) with low anastomotic leakage rates is an old method that is applied without diverting ileostomy. We aimed to evaluate the long-term functional and oncological results of the T-C procedure performed in patients with rectum cancer refusing diverting ileostomy. Method: Patients with middle or low rectal cancer who underwent T-C from March 2006 to December 2012 retrospectively reviewed for late results. Demographics, oncologic characteristics, postoperative complications, fuctional outcomes and overall survival (OS) time were evaluated. For functional results, Wexner Continence Grading scale scores, bladder functions, sexual functions, and SF-12 questionnaires were performed in all patients. In addition, anal manometry and defecography were performed in 7 patients. Results: Thirteen patients (6 men) median age 55 (range 44-82) years with rectal tumors at a median distance of 4 cm (range 1.5-7) from the anal verge underwent T-C. Mean follow-up was 101.2 (standard deviation 42.7) mounts. The 5-year OS rates was 85% . Postoperative morbidity rate is 23% (3 patients) . However, pelvic sepsis, anastomotic leak and perianal fistula were not seen. Functional results were good in 90% of patients at the end of the second year. Due to ongoing fragmentation and evacuation problems, 2 patients underwent permanent stoma. Conclusion: T-C with reasonable oncologic and functional results can be safely used sphincter-preserving procedure to treat patients with middle and distal rectal cancer without creation of diverting ileostomy

Özet

Amaç: Rektum kanserinde sfinkter koruyucu cerrahi sonrası anastomoz kaçağı gelişmesi felaket senaryosuna neden olabilir. Bu komplikasyonun şiddetini azaltmak için orta ve distal yerleşimli rektum tümörü olgularında genellikle koruyucu ileostomi açılmaktadır. Turnbull-Cutait abdominoperineal pull-through prosedürü (T-C) ileostomi açılmadan uygulanabilen düşük anastomoz kaçak oranlarına sahip eski bir yöntemdir. İleostomi açılmasını kabul etmeyen rektum kanseri olgularında uyguladığımız T-C prosedürünün uzun dönem onkolojik ve fonksiyonel sonuçlarını incelemeyi amaçladık. Yöntem: Kliniğimizde Mart 2006-Aralık 2012 tarihleri arasında orta veya distal yerleşimli rektum kanseri nedeni ile T-C prosedürü uygulanan olgular geriye dönük olarak incelendi. Demografik ve onkolojik özellikler, postoperatif komplikasyonlar, fonksiyonel sonuçlar ve genel sağkalım süreleri değerlendirildi. Fonksiyonel sonuçlar; Wexner Continence Grading skala skoru, mesane, cinsel fonksiyonlar ve hayat kalitesi (SF-12) anketleri ile değerlendirildi. Ayrıca 7 hastaya anal manometri ve defakografi uygulandı. Bulgular: Toplam on üç hastaya ( 6 erkek ) T-C uygulandı. Olguların ortalama yaşı median 55 (44-82) yıl, tümörün anal vergeden uzaklığı ortalama 4 (1,5-7) cm idi. Olgular ortalama 101,2±42,7 ay takip edildi. Beş yıllık genel sağkalım oranı %85 olarak saptandı. Postoperatif morbidite oranı %23’tür (3 hasta). Pelvik sepsis, anastomoz kaçağı ve perianal fistül görülmedi. Postoperatif iki yıl sonunda hastaların %90’ında fonksiyonel sonuçların iyi olduğu saptandı. Devam eden fragmantasyon ve boşaltım problemleri nedeniyle 2 hastaya kalıcı stoma uygulandı. Sonuç: T-C prosedürü, orta ve distal yerleşimli rektum tümörlerinin sfinkter koruyucu cerrahi tedavisinde koruyucu ileostomi açılmadan uygulanabilen, kabul edilebilir onkolojik ve fonksiyonel sonuçları ile güvenle kullanılabilen bir tekniktir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜMAY, L. V., ZORLUOĞLU, A., GÜNER, O. S., GÜLCÜ, B. (2022). An Old Method Turnbull Cutait; Using for Middle and Distal Rectal Cancer Surgery without Ileostomy. Oncological and Fuctional Late Outcomes. Türk Kolon ve Rektum Hastalıkları Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 104–111. https://ajindex.com/articles/634541

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Cutait DE, Figliolini FJ. A new method of colorectal anastomosis in abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1961;4:335-342.
  2. Turnbull RJ, Cuthbertson F. Abdominorectal pull-through resection for rectal cancer and for Hirschsprung’s disease. Delayed posterior colorectal anastomosis. Cleve Clin Q 196;28:109-115.
  3. Remzi FH, El Gazzaz G, Kiran RP, Kirat HT, Fazio VW. Outcomes following Turnbull-Cutait abdominoperineal pull-through compared with coloanal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 2009;96:424-429.
  4. Jarry J, Faucheron L, Moreno W, CA Bellara, Evrard S. Delayed colo-anal anastomosis is an alternative to prophylactic diverting stoma after total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal carcinomas. Eur Surg Oncol 2011;37:127-133.
  5. Bianco F, Belli A, De Franciscis S, Falato A, Romano GM. “Scarless” and no-stoma surgery for low rectal cancer: the laparoscopic pull-through delayed “high” colo-anal anastomosis. Updates Surg 2016;68:99-104.
  6. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996;34:220-233.
  7. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:77-97.
  8. Paun BC, Cassie S, MacLean AR, Dixon E, Buie WD. Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2010;251:807- 818. Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Norstein J, Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group. Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients. Colorectal Dis 2005;7:51-57.
  9. Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, Jeyarajah S, Zacharakis E, Purkayastha S. The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009;24:711-723. Sier MF, van Gelder L, Ubbink DT, Bemelman WA, Oostenbroek RJ. Factors affecting timing of closure and non-reversal of temporary ileostomies. Int J Colorectal Dis 2015;30:1185-1192.
  10. Hallet J, Milot H, Drolet S, Desrosiers E, Grégoire RC, Bouchard A. The clinical results of the Turnbull-Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 2014;18:579-590.
  11. Branagan G, Finnis D. Wessex Colorectal Cancer Audit Working Group. Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1021-1026.
  12. Bell SW, Walker KG, Rickard MJ, Sinclair G, Dent OF, Chapuis PH, et al. Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of loca