Journals / Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi / 2013 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 8

Süperior vena kava tıkanıklığı olan bir olgu sunumu

A case report of superior vena cava obstruction

Pages
724–727
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Special attention should be given to patients with benign or malignant SVC syndrome before permanent pacemaker implantation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We report herein an 83-year-old gentleman with lung cancer who presented with nausea, complete atrioventricular (AV) block and presyncope.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Despite a pres- ent temporary pacemaker, which had been inserted through the femoral vein 5 days previously, the patient had asystole attacks that resolved with atropine administration.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Special attention should be given to patients with benign or malignant SVC syndrome before permanent pacemaker implantation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

We report herein an 83-year-old gentleman with lung cancer who presented with nausea, complete atrioventricular (AV) block and presyncope. Despite a pres- ent temporary pacemaker, which had been inserted through the femoral vein 5 days previously, the patient had asystole attacks that resolved with atropine administration. Coronary angiography demonstrated no critical stenosis. Sick sinus syndrome was diagnosed, and permanent pacemaker im- plantation was decided. However, the guidewire could not be advanced into the superior vena cava (SVC). Right jug- ular venogram showed complete obstruction of the SVC. Subsequent computerized tomography also revealed its ob- struction by a large lung tumor. Special attention should be given to patients with benign or malignant SVC syndrome before permanent pacemaker implantation.

Özet

Akciğer kanseri oldugu bilinen 83 yaşında erkek hasta bulantı, presenkop ve tam atriyoventriküler (AV) blok ile acil servise getirildi. Beş gün önce sağ femoral venden yerleştirilmiş geçici pacemaker (PM) olmasına rağmen atropine cevap veren asistoli atakları oldu. Koroner anjiyografide koroner arterlerde kritik darlık görülmedi. Hasta sinus sendromu düşünülerek kalıcı PM konmasına karar verildi. İşlem sırasında subklaviya veni girişinde rehber tel brakiyosefalik venden superiyor vena kavaya (SVC) ilerletilemedi. Eş zamanlı sağ juguler venogram SVC tam tıkanıklığını gösterdi. Bilgisayarlı tomografi sağ akciğer üst lobunda SVCye baskı yapan büyük tümörü ortaya koydu. Benign ya da malign SVC sendromu olan olgularda PM yerleştirilmesinden önce özel önem ve dikkat gerektiğini anımsatmak istedik.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUCA, Y., TİMURKAYMAK, T., TEPE, S. (2022). Süperior vena kava tıkanıklığı olan bir olgu sunumu. Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 8, 724–727. https://ajindex.com/articles/632952

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Wilson LD, Detterbeck FC, Yahalom J. Clinical practice. Superior vena cava syndrome with malignant causes. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1862-9. CrossRef 2. Nickloes T, Mack L. Superior vena cava syndrome. Available at: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/460865-overview. Accessed November 25, 2013. 3. Taçoy G, Ozdemir M, Cengel A. Extensive venous obstruction caused by a permanent pacemaker lead: a case report. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2004;4:89-91. 4. Eren S, Karaman A, Okur A. The superior vena cava syndrome caused by malignant disease. Imaging with multi-detector row CT. Eur J Radiol 2006;59:93-103. CrossRef 5. Dağdelen S. Superior vena cava syndrome arising from subclavian vein port catheter implantation and paraneoplastic syndrome. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2009;37:125-7. 6. Hebbar P, Deshmukh A, Pant S, Paydak H. Two is company, three is a crowd. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2012;13:271-3. CrossRef 7. Dib C, Hennebry TA. Successful treatment of SVC syndrome using isolated pharmacomechanical thrombolysis. J Invasive Cardiol 2012;24:E50-3. 8. Kapur S, Paik E, Rezaei A, Vu DN. Where there is blood, there is a way: unusual collateral vessels in superior and inferior vena cava obstruction. Radiographics 2010;30:67-78. 9. Gwon DI, Paik SH. Successful treatment of malignant superior vena cava syndrome using a stent-graft. Korean J Radiol 2012;13:227-31. CrossRef 10. Barakat K, Hill J, Kelly P. Permanent transfemoral pacemaker implantation is the technique of choice for patients in whom the superior vena cava is inaccessible. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000;23:446-9. CrossRef 11. Mathur G, Stables RH, Heaven D, Ingram A, Sutton R. Permanent pacemaker implantation via the femoral vein: an alternative in cases with contraindications to the pectoral approach. Europace 2001;3:56-9. CrossRef