Journals / Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi / 2015 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 3

Angiographic evaluation of branching pattern and anatomy of the aortic arch

Arkus aorta anatomisinin ve dallanma paternindeki varyasyonların anjiyografik olarak değerlendirilmesi

Pages
219–226
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Knowledge of the variations and anatomy of the aortic arch is essential during interventional procedures and neck-thorax surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The study aimed to investigate anatomical variations in branching pattern and anatomy of the aortic arch, and the prevalence of each type.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Between September 2011 and November 2013, angiographic studies of 270 patients (144 male, 126 female) were analyzed retrospectively for variations in branching pattern and anatomy of the aortic arch.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Knowledge of the variations and anatomy of the aortic arch is essential during interventional procedures and neck-thorax surgery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to investigate anatomical variations in branching pattern and anatomy of the aortic arch, and the prevalence of each type. Methods: Between September 2011 and November 2013, angiographic studies of 270 patients (144 male, 126 female) were analyzed retrospectively for variations in branching pattern and anatomy of the aortic arch. Patient mean age was 59.8 years (range, 13-88). Branching variations were found and divided into subtypes. Patients were also classified according to arch anatomy. Incidence of variations and types of aortic arch were statistically analysed. Results: Analysis of the 270 patients revealed six types of branching pattern. Type I, classical pattern arch with three branches (TB, LCC, LS), was observed in 198 cases (73.3%). Type II (bovine arch), the most commonly observed variation, in which LCC originates from TB, was observed in 58 cases (21.5%). Type III, in which the left vertebral artery arises from the arch, was seen in seven cases (2.6%). Type IV, a combination of types II and III, was observed in three cases (1.1%). Type V, common origin of common carotids, LS and aberrant RS, was found in three cases (1.1%). Type VI (avian type), arch with only two branches, was observed in one case (0.4%). When patients were classified according to aortic arch anatomy, Type 1, Type 2 and Type 3 were observed in 195, 40 and 35 patients respectively. Conclusion: Knowledge of the variations and anatomy of the aortic arch is essential during interventional procedures and neck-thorax surgery.

Özet

Amaç: Bu yazıda, arkus aorta anatomisini ve dallanma paternindeki varyasyonları araştırmayı ve her bir tipin görülme sıklığını ortaya çıkarmayı amaçladık.Yöntemler: Eylül 2011-Kasım 2013 tarihleri arasında anjiyografi yapılan 270 hasta (144 erkek, 126 kadın) arkus aorta anatomisi ve dallanma paternindeki varyasyonlar açısından geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi. Hastaların ortalama yaşı 59.8 idi (dağılım: 13-88). Sık ve nadir görülen dallanma varyasyonları bulunarak tiplere ayrıldı. Ayrıca hastalar arkus aorta anatomisine göre sınıflandırıldı. Varyasyonların görülme sıklığı ve arkus aorta tipleri istatistiksel olarak değerlendirildi.Bulgular: Toplam 270 hastanın değerlendirilmesiyle altı tip dallanma türü bulundu. Hastaların 198inde (%73.3) arkus aortadan üç dalın çıktığı (TB, LCC, LS) klasik tip (tip 1), 58inde (%21.5) LCCnin TBden köken aldığı en sık görülen değişiklik olan tip 2 (bovine arkusu tipi), yedisinde (%2.6) sol vertebral arterin arkus aortadan köken aldığı tip 3 görüldü. Tip 2 ve 3ün birleşimi olan tip 4, üç hastada (%1.1) görülürken, sırasıyla ana karotis arterlerin ortak kökü, LS ve aberran RS dizilimi olan tip 5 üç hastada (%1.1) saptandı. Arkus aortadan çıkan iki dalın olduğu (ana karotis ve subklavyan arterlerinin ortak kökleri) avian form olarak bilinen tip 6 ise bir hastada (%0.4) görüldü. Hastaları arkus aorta anatomisine göre sınıflandırdığımızda ise tip 1, tip 2 ve tip 3 sırasıyla 195, 40 ve 35 hastada görüldü.Sonuç: Arkus aorta anatomisi ve varyasyonlarını bilmek damar içi işlemler ve göğüs-boyun cerrahisi esnasında büyük öneme sahiptir.

🔖

Cite This Article

HEKİMOĞLU, B., AKÇALAR, S., KURT, A., GÜNEŞ, İ. T., ERGUN, O., DURMAZ, H. A., BİRGİ, E. (2022). Angiographic evaluation of branching pattern and anatomy of the aortic arch. Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 3, 219–226. https://ajindex.com/articles/632719

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Adachi B. Das arteriensystem der Japaner. Vol
  2. Kenkyusha, Kyoto; 1928. pp. 29-41
  3. Ergun E, Şimşek B, Koşar PN, Yılmaz BK, Turgut AT. Anatomical variations in branching pattern of arcus aorta: 64-slice CTA appearance. Surg Radiol Anat 2013;35:503-9
  4. Natsis KI, Tsitouridis IA, Didagelos MV, Fillipidis AA, Vlasis KG, Tsikaras PD. Anatomical variations in the branches of the human aortic arch in 633 angiographies: clinical significance and literature review. Surg Radiol Anat 2009;31:319-23
  5. Backer CL, Ilbawi MN, Idriss FS, DeLeon SY. Vascular anomalies causing tracheoesophageal compression. Review of experience in children. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989;97:725-31
  6. Patil ST, Meshram MM, Kamdi NY, Kasote AP, Parchand MP. Study on branching pattern of aortic arch in Indian. Anat Cell Biol 2012;45:203-6
  7. Satti SR, Cerniglia CA, Koenigsberg RA. Cervical vertebral artery variations: an anatomic study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:976-80
  8. Paraskevas G, Agios P, Stavrakas M, Stoltidou A, Tzaveas A. Left common carotid artery arising from the brachiocephalic trunk: a case report. Cases J 2008;1:83
  9. Madhwal S, Rajagopal V, Bhatt DL, Bajzer CT, Whitlow P, Kapadia SR. Predictors of difficult carotid stenting as determined by aortic arch angiography. J Invasive Cardiol 2008;20:200-4
  10. Celikyay ZR, Koner AE, Celikyay F, Denız C, Acu B, Firat MM. Frequency and imaging findings of variations in human aortic arch anatomy based on multidetector computed tomography data. Clin Imaging 2013;37:1011-9
  11. Müller M, Schmitz BL, Pauls S, Schick M, Röhrer S, Kapapa T, et al. Variations of the aortic arch - a study on the most common branching patterns. Acta Radiol 2011;52:738-42
  12. Karacan A, Türkvatan A, Karacan K. Anatomical variations of aortic arch branching: evaluation with computed tomographic angiography. Cardiol Young 2014;24:485-93
  13. Williams GD, Edmonds HW. Variations in the arrangement of the branches arising from the aortic arch in American whites and Negroes. Anat Rec 1935;62:139-46
  14. Nelson ML, Sparks CD. Unusual aortic arch variation: distal origin of common carotid arteries. Clin Anat 2001;14:62-5
  15. Layton KF, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ, Lindell EP, Cox VS. Bovine aortic arch variant in humans: clarification of a common misnomer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1541-2
  16. Berko NS, Jain VR, Godelman A, Stein EG, Ghosh S, Haramati LB. Variants and anomalies of thoracic vasculature on computed tomographic angiography in adults. J Comput