Journals / Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi / 2019 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 4

Age should be considered in cut-off values for increased carotid intima-media thickness

Artmış karotis intima-media kalınlığı için sınır değerleri belirlemede yaş göz önünde bulundurulmalıdır

Pages
301–311
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CC-IMT measurementsshould be included in USG reports.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:mm to define abnormally increased carotid intima-mediathickness (C-IMT), regardless of age or gender.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This studywas conducted to examine the effects of age and gender onC-IMT and cut-off values for C-IMT in different age groups.Methods: A total of 644 patients with a recorded C-IMT measurement,at least 1 cardiovascular risk factor, and aged between20 and 90 years were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CC-IMT measurementsshould be included in USG reports.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

mm to define abnormally increased carotid intima-mediathickness (C-IMT), regardless of age or gender. This studywas conducted to examine the effects of age and gender onC-IMT and cut-off values for C-IMT in different age groups.Methods: A total of 644 patients with a recorded C-IMT measurement,at least 1 cardiovascular risk factor, and aged between20 and 90 years were included in the study. Commonand internal C-IMT (CC-IMT and IC-IMT) measurementswere obtained using carotid ultrasonography (USG). Thepatients were divided into 5 groups based on age: GroupI (20–40 years), Group II (41–50 years), Group III (51–60years), Group IV (61–70 years), and Group V (>70 years).Results: The CC-IMT and IC-IMT values were significantlygreater as the age of the group increased. Group I to GroupV had a median CC-IMT value of 0.70 mm, 0.70 mm, 0.75mm, 0.75 mm, and 0.85 mm, respectively. The median ICIMTvalue for each group was 0.60 mm, 0.65 mm, 0.70 mm,0.70 mm, and 0.80 mm, respectively. The median CC-IMTvalue was 50 μm greater than the median IC-IMT value inall groups. Only the CC-IMT value was significantly differentin males (0.80±0.20 mm vs. 0.76±0.19 mm; p=0.020).Age, hypertension (HT), smoking, hyperlipidemia, systolicdiastolicblood pressure, and body mass index measureswere associated with increased C-IMT. Regression analysisrevealed that increased C-IMT was independently associatedwith age and HT presence. Each decade of life and thepresence of HT revealed an incidence of increased C-IMTby 44% and 53%, respectively.Conclusion: C-IMT significantly increased with age. New,age-appropriate cut-off values are needed for C-IMT assessment.In addition, it was observed that the CC-IMTvalue was approximately 50 μm greater than the IC-IMTmeasurement in all age groups. CC-IMT measurementsshould be included in USG reports.

Özet

Amaç: Yaş ve cinsiyetten bağımsız olarak kılavuzlarda artmış karotis intima-media kalınlığı (C-IMT) için sınır değer olarak >0.9 mm kabul edilmektedir. Çalışmamızda, yaş ve cinsiyetin C-IMT üzerine olan etkisini ve değişik yaş gruplarında C-IMT sınır değerlerini araştırmayı planladık. Yöntemler: Bu geriye dönük çalışmaya 20–90 yaş aralığında en az bir kardiyovasküler risk faktörü olan C-IMT ölçümü yapılmış 644 hasta alındı. Karotid ultrasonografisinde (USG) ana ve internal C-IMT (CC-IMT ve IC-IMT) ölçümleri elde edildi. Hastaların klinik ve demografik parametreleri belirlendi. Çalışmaya dahil edilen hastalar; Grup I (20–40), Grup II (41–50), Grup III (51–60), Grup IV (61–70) ve Grup V (>70) olarak beş gruba ayrıldı. Bulgular: CC-IMT ve IC-IMT değerleri Grup I’den Grup V’e anlamlı olarak artmaktaydı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜMBÜL, H. E., KOÇ, A. S. (2022). Age should be considered in cut-off values for increased carotid intima-media thickness. Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 4, 301–311. https://ajindex.com/articles/632061

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/ ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J 2018;39:3021–104
  2. Authors/Task Force Members, Rydén L, Grant PJ, Anker SD, Berne C, Cosentino F, Danchin N, et al. ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD: the Task Force on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and developed in collaboration with the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Eur Heart J 2013;34:3035–87
  3. Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano AL, et al. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J 2016;37:2315–81
  4. Catapano AL, Graham I, De Backer G, Wiklund O, Chapman MJ, Drexel H, Hoes AW, et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias. Eur Heart J 2016;37:2999–3058
  5. Nezu T, Hosomi N, Aoki S, Matsumoto M. Carotid Intima- Media Thickness for Atherosclerosis. J Atheroscler Thromb 2016;23:18–31
  6. Brohall G, Odén A, Fagerberg B. Carotid artery intima-media thickness in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance: a systematic review. Diabet Med 2006;23:609–16
  7. Al-Shali K, House AA, Hanley AJ, Khan HM, Harris SB, Mamakeesick M, et al. Differences between carotid wall morphological phenotypes measured by ultrasound in one, two and three dimensions. Atherosclerosis 2005;178:319–25
  8. Raitakari OT, Juonala M, Kähönen M, Taittonen L, Laitinen T, Mäki-Torkko N, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors in childhood and carotid artery intima-media thickness in adulthood: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. JAMA 2003;290:2277–83
  9. Su TC, Chien KL, Jeng JS, Chen MF, Hsu HC, Torng PL, et al. Age- and gender-associated determinants of carotid intima- media thickness: a community-based study. J Atheroscler Thromb 2012;19:872–80
  10. Sinning C, Wild PS, Echevarria FM, Wilde S, Schnabel R, Lubos E, et al.Sex differences in