Journals / Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

The effectiveness of 50 gram oral glucose challenge test in gestational diabetes screening

Gestasyonel diabet taramasında 50 gr oral glukoz testinin etkinliği

Pages
258–262
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There is a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Our objective is to investigate whether 50 gr GCT is enough and effective when performed for pregnant women only carrying the risk factors for GDM.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and methods: A total of 426 pregnant women having 24-28 weeks of pregnancy were enrolled to this prospective study between November 2005 and November 2006 in Gynecology and Obstetrics Departments of Ondokuz Mayıs University.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There is a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Our objective is to investigate whether 50 gr GCT is enough and effective when performed for pregnant women only carrying the risk factors for GDM. Material and methods: A total of 426 pregnant women having 24-28 weeks of pregnancy were enrolled to this prospective study between November 2005 and November 2006 in Gynecology and Obstetrics Departments of Ondokuz Mayıs University. Pregnant women were divided into two groups according to the presence of risk factors for GDM. 50 gr GCT was applied to both groups. 100 gr oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was applied to the cases with positive 50 gr GCT. Positive predictive value (PPV) of 50 gr GCT was calculated for both groups. Results: Of 426 evaluated pregnant women, 222 pregnant women had no risk factor for GDM and the rest 204 pregnant women had at least one risk factor. 4 out of 18 pregnant women who do not carry risk factors, and who had 100 gr OGTT had the diagnosis of GDM, in prevalance of 1,8%. 18 out of 44 pregnant women who carry risk factors, and who had 100 gr OGTT had the diagnosis of GDM, in prevalance of 8,8%. Of 426 pregnant women, 22 had diagnosis of GDM and prevalance of GDM was found to be as 5,2%. While PPV of 50 gr GCT is 40,9% in the pregnant women who carry risk factors, it is 22,2% in the pregnant women only carrying the risk factors. There is a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı 50 gr glukoz tarama testinin sadece gestasyonel diabetes mellitus için risk faktörü taşıyan gebelere uygulanmasının yeterli ve etkili olup olmadığını saptamaktır. Gereç ve yöntem: Bu çalışma Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniğine Kasım 2005 - Kasım 2006 tarihleri arasında gebelik takibi nedeniyle başvuran 24-28. gebelik haftalarındaki 426 gebede, prospektif olarak yapıldı. Gebeler, GDM için risk faktörüne sahip olup olmamalarına göre iki gruba ayrıldı. Her iki gruba da 50 gr GTT uygulanıp, 50 gr GTT sonucu yüksek çıkan gebelere 100 gr oral glukoz tolerans testi (100 gr OGTT) yapıldı. Her iki grup için 50 gr GTT’nin pozitif prediktif değeri (PPD) hesaplandı. Bulgular: Çalışmaya dahil edilen 426 gebeden, 222 gebe risk faktörü taşımazken, 204 gebe en az bir risk faktörüne sahipti. Risk faktörü taşımayan ve 100 gr OGTT uygulanan 18 gebenin 4’üne GDM tanısı konuldu. Prevalans %1,8 olarak hesaplandı. Risk faktörü taşıyan ve 100 gr OGTT uygulanan 44 gebenin 18’ine GDM tanısı konuldu. Prevalans %8,8 olarak hesaplandı. Çalışmaya alınan 426 gebenin toplam 22 tanesinde GDM saptanmış olup, GDM’nin prevelansı %5,2 olarak hesaplandı. Risk faktörleri taşıyan gebelerde 50 gr GTT’nin pozitif prediktif değeri %40,9 iken risk faktörleri taşımayanlarda %22,2 olup aralarında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulundu. (p

🔖

Cite This Article

TOSUN, M., MALATYALIOĞLU, E., ÇETİNKAYA, M. B., SAGÜN, M., KÖKÇÜ, A., ALPER, T. (2022). The effectiveness of 50 gram oral glucose challenge test in gestational diabetes screening. Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 258–262. https://ajindex.com/articles/631704

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. American Diabetes Association. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 1998; 21 Suppl:5-19
  2. American Diabetes Association. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1998; 21 Suppl 1:60-1
  3. World Health Organization. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Geneva: WHO 1999 (WHO/NCD/NCS/99,2)
  4. Landon MB, Gabbe SG. Diabetes Mellitus and Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin of North Am 1992; 19(4): 633- 54
  5. Kühl C, Homnes PJ, Andersen O. Etiology and pathophysiology of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 1985; 34(2): 66- 70
  6. O’Sullivan JB. Body weight and subsequent diabetes mellitus. JAMA 1982; 248: 949
  7. Jovanovic-Peterson L, Peterson CM. Rationale for prevention and treatment of glucose- mediated macrosomia: a protocol for gestational diabetes. Endocrinol Pract 1996;2:118- 29
  8. Pan XR, Li GW, Hu YH, Wang JX, Yang WY, An ZX, et al. Effects of diet and exercise in preventing NIDDM in people with impaired glucose tolerance. The Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 1997;20:537- 44
  9. Carpenter MW, Coustan DR. Criteria of screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 144: 768- 73
  10. Sepe SJ, Connel FA, Geiss LS, et al. Gestational Diabetes: İncidence, maternal characteristics, and perinatal outcome. Diabetes 1985; 34(2): 13
  11. Kühl C, Homnes PJ, Andersen O. Etiology and pathophysiology of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 1985; 34(2): 66- 70
  12. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician- gynecologists. Gestational diabetes. ACOG Practice Bulletin 30. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 525- 38
  13. American Diabetes Association. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2004; 27(1): 88- 90
  14. Coustan DR, Nelson C, Carpenter MW, et al. Maternal age and screening for gestational diabetes: a population based study. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 557- 61
  15. Carpenter MW, Coustan DR. Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 144: 768- 73
  16. Bonomo M, Gandini ML, Mastropasqua A, et al. Which cut- off level should be used in screening for glucose intolerance in pregnancy? Definition of Screening Methods for Gestational Diabetes Study Group of the Lombardy Section of the Italian Society of Diabetology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 179-85
  17. Sancı M,