Journals / Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of emergent periparum hysterectomy cases: A six year experience

Acil peripartum histerektomi olgularının değerlendirilmesi: Altı yıllık deneyim

Pages
218–223
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

EPH is a procedure with high mortality and morbidity but is life-saving when performed at suitable time.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate the incidence, indications, risk factors of emergent peripartum hysterectomy (EPH) and its effect on maternal mortality and morbidity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Design: Retrospective study Setting: Selcuk University, Meram Medical Faculty, Gynecology and Obstetric Department, Konya Patients: Thirty-seven EPH cases performed due to some obstetric complicatios were investigated retrospectively between January 2003 and April 2009.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:EPH is a procedure with high mortality and morbidity but is life-saving when performed at suitable time.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate the incidence, indications, risk factors of emergent peripartum hysterectomy (EPH) and its effect on maternal mortality and morbidity. Design: Retrospective study Setting: Selcuk University, Meram Medical Faculty, Gynecology and Obstetric Department, Konya Patients: Thirty-seven EPH cases performed due to some obstetric complicatios were investigated retrospectively between January 2003 and April 2009. Interventions: Patient’s data, hospital records and other knowledges about patients were obtained from hospital archieves. Patient’s ages, parity, gravidy, gestational weeks and mode of deliveries were researched as demographic features. Operative records were also investigated. Main Outcome Measures: Incidence, indications and risk factors for peripartum hysterectomy. Results: A total of 37 cases were included in this study and the incidence of EPH was recorded as 0,223%. Total and subtotal hysterectomies were performed in 59,5% and 40,5% of the patients, respectively. Indications for hysterectomy were 43,2% atonia, 37,8% placenta previa, acreata and increata, 13,5% uterine rupture. Hysterectomies were performed in 54% of cases after caserean section, in 46% of cases after vaginal births. Oophorectomy and bilateral hipogastric arter ligation were performed in 8,1% and 51,3% of the patients, respectively. Three patients died, one due to multiple organ insufficiency and DIC. Conclusion: Uterin atonia is still the most common cause of postpartum hemorrhagia and EPH. EPH is a procedure with high mortality and morbidity but is life-saving when performed at suitable time.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada amacımız hastanemizde gerçekleştirilen acil peripartum histerektomilerin (APH) insidansını, endikasyonlarını, risk faktörlerini, maternal morbidite ve mortalite üzerine etkilerini araştırmak. Planlama: Retrospektif bir çalışma Ortam: Selçuk Üniversitesi, Meram Tıp Fakültesi, Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum AD, Konya Hastalar: Çalışmaya Ocak 2003 ile Nisan 2009 tarihleri arasında çeşitli obstetrik nedenlerle yapılan 37 acil peripartum histerektomi vakası dahil edildi. Girişim: Hasta bilgileri, hastane kayıtları ve diğer hastayla ilişkili bilgiler hasta dosyalarından elde edildi. Hastaların demografik özellikleri olarak yaş, parite, gravida, gebelik haftası, ve doğum şekilleri belirlendi. Operasyonla ilişkili bilgiler kaydedildi. Değerlendirme parametreleri: Peripartum histerektominin insidansı, endikasyonları ve risk faktörleri Bulgular: Bu sürede toplam 37 vaka kaydedildi ve APH insidansı % 0,223 olarak belirlendi. Olguların 22 (%59,5)‘sine total, 15 (% 40,5)‘ine subtotal histerektomi uygulandı. Histerektomi endikasyonları %43,2 atoni, %37,8 plasenta previa, acreata ve increata, %13,5 uterin rüptür olarak kaydedildi. Histerektomilerin 20 (%54) ‘si sezaryenlerde, 17 (%46) ‘si vajinal doğum sonrası uygulandı. 3 (%8,1) hastaya ooferektomi, 19 (% 51,3) hastaya bilateral hipogastrik arter ligasyonu yapıldı. DIC ve multi-organ yetmezliği nedeniyle 1 olmak üzere 3 (%8,1) hastada exitus gerçekleşti. Yorum: Uterin atoni postpartum hemoraji ve acil peripartum histerektomi için halen en sık endikasyonu oluşturmaktadır. APH, yüksek maternal morbidite ve mortalite ile seyreden, ancak zamanlaması doğru yapıldığında hayat kurtarıcı bir prosedürdür.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖRKEMLİ, H., TAZEGÜL, A., GEZGİNÇ, K., BALCI, O., ÖZDEMİR, S., YAZICI, F. (2022). Evaluation of emergent periparum hysterectomy cases: A six year experience. Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 218–223. https://ajindex.com/articles/631651

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Henrich W, Surbek D, Kainer F, Grottke O, Hopp H, Kiesewetter H, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of peripartum bleeding. J Perinat Med 2008; 36: 467- 78
  2. Kayabasoglu F, Guzin K, Aydogdu S, Sezginsoy S, Turkgeldi L, Gunduz G. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary Istanbul hospital. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2008; 278: 251- 6
  3. Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GH, Bruinse HW. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: A prospective study in The Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006; 124: 187- 92
  4. Yucel O, Ozdemir I, Yucel N, Somunkiran A. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a 9-year review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2006; 274: 84- 7
  5. Jou HJ, Hung HW, Ling PY, Chen SM, Wu SC. Peripartum hysterectomy in Taiwan. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2008; 101: 269-72
  6. Zeteroglu S, Ustun Y, Engin-Ustun Y, Sahin G, Kamaci M. Peripartum hysterectomy in a teaching hospital in the eastern region of Turkey. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005; 120: 57- 62
  7. Kastner ES, Figueroa R, Garry D, Maulik D. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: experience at a community teaching hospital. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 971- 5
  8. Ozden S, Yildirim G, Basaran T, Gurbuz B, Dayicioglu V. Analysis of 59 cases of emergent peripartum hysterectomies during a 13-year period. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2005; 271: 363-7
  9. Maral i, Sözen U, Balık E. Peripartum hysterectomy: analysis of 64 cases Anatolian J Gynecol Obst 1993; 3: 43- 7
  10. Habek D, Becareviç R. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary obstetric center: 8 year evaluation. Fetal Diagn Ther 2006; 22: 139- 42
  11. Bai SW, Lee HJ, Cho JS, Park YW, Kim SK, Park KH. Peripartum hysterectomy and associated factors. J Reprod Med 2003; 48: 148- 52
  12. Akar ME, Yilmaz ES, Yuksel B, Yilmaz Z. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 113: 178- 81
  13. Williams MA, Mittendorf R. ‹ncreasing maternal age as a determinant of plasenta previa. More important than increasing parity? J Reprod Med 1993; 38: 425- 8
  14. Clark SL, Yeh SY, Phelan Jp, Bruce S, Paul RH. Emergency hysterectomy for obstetric hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 64: 376- 80
  15. Selo-Ojeme DO, Bhattacharjee P, Izuwa-Njoku NF, Kadir RA. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary London hospital. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2005; 271: 154- 9
  16. Zelop CM, Harlow BL, Frigoletto FD Jr, Safon LE, Saltzman DH. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 1443- 8
  17. Hershkowitz R, Fraser D, Mazor M, Leiberman JR. One or multiple prev